This is the second part of a two-part series. Part I outlines the expansion announcement.
In an August 14 announcement, Bolivian Vice President, Alvaro Garcia Linera, laid out an ambitious plan to increase the country’s cropland by 250 percent, and triple its agricultural output. The proposal is touted as way to increase both food and economic security for the inland South American country, but what will it mean for its forests?
Global Forest Watch, a subsidiary of World Resources Institute, reports that forestry forms 2.2 percent of the Bolivian GDP ($431 million). In the last 13 years, about three mha of land has been deforested in Bolivia. The new proposal demands land. Is there land available then that is already disturbed and can be reclaimed for agriculture? In other words, can the expansion of the agricultural frontier by 7.78 mha be achieved without further deforestation?
Forest loss trajectories per year according to data from the Global Forest Watch.
Tree cover extent (left) and deforestation between 2000-2012 (right) in Bolivia. Most deforestation can be observed within the Department of Santa Cruz, which is Bolivia’s largest food producer. Data from Global Forest Watch. Click to enlarge.
“No land without forest is available anymore,“ Dr. Robert Müller, a biologist from the Institute of Geography in Georg-August-Universität, in Göttingen, Germany, who has been working in Bolivia since 2000, told mongabay.com. “Clearing 1 million hectares per year would increase the deforestation rate – which is among the highest in the world already – by a factor of 4 or 5.”
Most of this proposed deforestation would most likely occur in the north and east of the department of Santa Cruz, according to Müller. Additional land could be recovered from the south of the department of Beni, as well as the Andean foothills in the department of La Paz.
Projected deforestation (in yellow) assuming an expansion of 5 million hectares as of 2040. Figure adapted from Müller et al, 2014.
“The announcement is in strong contradiction to environmental policies in Bolivia, such as the Law of Mother Earth,” Müller said. “The required land would only be available in forested areas where conversion to non-forest uses is forbidden or highly restricted by law.”
According to Müller, mechanized and small-scale agriculture were responsible for 29.7 percent and 18.4 percent of deforestation, respectively, over the last ten years. But he also pointed out that the main driver of deforestation in Bolivia is cattle ranching, which contributed to over half of all deforestation between 2000 and 2010.
Agriculture within the department of Santa Cruz is already highly mechanized, focused on the extremely fertile soil in the Rio Grande floodplain. However, in order to expand, agriculture will need to move into areas with poorer soil, necessitating the use of fertilizers, according to Müller.
An ecological map of Bolivia (left) in comparison to the various players and their land use rights (right). The Santa Cruz Department has the most variable habitat types and is also occupied by the highest area used for mechanized farming. Maps adapted from the CIFOR report on deforestation in Bolivia. Click to enlarge.
The direct causes of deforestation in Bolivia in the 1990s and 2000s, indicating reliance on mechanized agriculture and cattle farming concentrated in the Santa Cruz Department. Map adapted from the CIFOR report on Bolivian deforestation. Click to enlarge.
Proposal outcomes demand extensive change
On the one hand, this proposal could bring economic stability to Bolivia, with less dependence on imports, and a healthy population fed on home-grown products. The proposal is slated to provide 1,000,000 new jobs and will require an investment of 13 million dollars. In addition to consolidating Bolivian food sovereignty, it will generate huge surpluses and thus large amounts of currency through exports.
However, the goals of the proposal cannot be achieved without other significant changes to Bolivia’s agricultural practices and economy.
First, increases in food production will require more than just land acquisition – it will also require increased technical know-how and better food production strategies. According to Álvarez, Bolivia remains noncompetitive in cotton, maiz and soy production; these low yields can only be increased if the government lifts the ban on using transgenic seeds and biotechnology to improve growth.
Bolivia’s forests are home to giant otters (Pteronura brasiliensis), which are listed by the IUCN as Endangered. Individuals otters identify each other by the unique patterns of white splotches on the necks. Photo by Rio Cicica.
Aggressive mechanization, investigations into using new species, and a massive transportation overhaul are some of Álvarez’s other requirements.
The Bolivian road network will need to be expanded, and complementary transportation systems (including air, water and train) will need to be fortified. Álvarez even proposes the creation of a Bolivian Merchant Navy to manage the expected massive food production that is the nation’s ultimate target.
“The challenge for 2025 is a big challenge,” said Vice President Linera in a speech during the unveiling of the new proposal, “and [it] can [be] achieved together, because we are talking of a challenge for Bolivians to be solved by Bolivians.”
After all, concludes Vice President Linera, “producing food is producing gold in the world market.”
According to Linera, Bolivia is ready to meet this new challenge.
Citations:
- IBCE. 2014. Encuentro Agroindustrial Productivo. 22:14.
- Killeen, T. J., A. Guerra, M. Calzada, L. Correa, V. Calderon, L. Soria, B. Quezada, and M. K. Steininger. 2008. Total historical land-use change in eastern Bolivia: Who, where, when, and how much? Ecology and Society 13(1): 36.
- Müller, R.; Pacheco, P.; Montero, J.C. 2014. The context of deforestation and forest degradation in Bolivia: Drivers, agents and institutions. CIFOR Occasional Paper no. 108 Bogor, Indonesia.
- Robert Müller R., Larrea-Alcázar D, Cuéllar S, Espinoza S 2014. Causas directas de la deforestación reciente (2000-2010) y modelado de dos escenarios futuros en las tierras bajas de Bolivia. Ecología en Bolivia 49(1): 20-34.
- Müller, Robert, et al. 2011. Spatiotemporal modeling of the expansion of mechanized agriculture in the Bolivian lowland forests. Applied Geography 31.2: 631-640.
- Pacheco, Pablo. 2006. Agricultural expansion and deforestation in lowland Bolivia: the import substitution versus the structural adjustment model. Land Use Policy 23.3: 205-225.
Related articles
Illegal tropical deforestation driven globally by “agro-conversion”
(09/11/2014) Nearly 50 percent of tropical deforestation to make room for commercial agriculture between 2000 and 2012 was done so illegally. That’s a key finding of a report published by the U.S.-based nonprofit organization Forest Trends looking at the global tide of tropical forest “agro-conversion.”
Bolivian vice president proposes unprecedented agricultural expansion (PART 1)
(09/10/2014) On August 14, the Bolivian Vice President, Alvaro Garcia Linera, made a startling announcement: by 2025, Bolivia was going to make two striking developments – first, it would expand all cultivated land to 2.5 times its present area, and second, it would triple food production from 15 to 45 million tons.
Scientists uncover five new species of ‘toupee’ monkeys in the Amazon
(09/02/2014) While saki monkeys may be characterized by floppy mops of hair that resemble the worst of human toupees, these acrobatic, tree-dwelling primates are essential for dispersing seeds. After long being neglected by both scientists and conservationists, a massive research effort by one intrepid researcher has revealed the full-scale of saki monkey diversity, uncovering five new species.
How do we save the world’s vanishing old-growth forests?
(08/26/2014) There’s nothing in the world like a primary forest, which has never been industrially logged or cleared by humans. They are often described as cathedral-like, due to pillar-like trees and carpet-like undergrowth. Yet, the world’s primary forests—also known as old-growth forests—are falling every year, and policy-makers are not doing enough to stop it.
NASA: Forest loss leaps in Bolivia, Mekong region
(08/08/2014) New satellite data from NASA suggests that deforestation is sharply increasing in Bolivia and Mekong countries during the second quarter of 2014.
(07/09/2014) The Amazon is the largest tropical forest on the planet, covering about 6.5 million square kilometers, although much has been lost in recent decades.Yet new research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) finds that quite recently—just 500 years ago—a significant portion of the southern Amazon was not the tall-canopied forest it is today, but savannah.
Size matters: small animals abundant in fragmented forests, large animals not
(06/25/2014) Habitat fragmentation and hunting are both distinct critical issues facing forests today that require their own countermeasures. Yet, much research has chosen to conflate the two, potentially leading to ineffective ecosystem management. According to a new study, the interaction of both factors can contradict the effects of hunting and fragmentation alone, revealing a research and management gap that urgently needs to be filled.
NASA detects surge in deforestation in Malaysia, Bolivia during first quarter of 2014
(04/21/2014) Forest disturbance in Malaysia, Bolivia, Panama, and Ecuador surged during the first quarter of 2014, according to NASA data.
Ants plant rainforests, one seed at a time
(04/14/2014) Deforestation is destroying forests around the world, but its effects are especially obvious in the Amazon Basin. Due to cattle ranching, soybean farming, logging, and slash-and-burn agriculture, the rainforest is disappearing at a rapid pace. But a recent study published in the Journal of Ecology offers a unique solution to replanting the deforested landscapes: ants.
- Killeen, T. J., A. Guerra, M. Calzada, L. Correa, V. Calderon, L. Soria, B. Quezada, and M. K. Steininger. 2008. Total historical land-use change in eastern Bolivia: Who, where, when, and how much? Ecology and Society 13(1): 36.