News sections
  • Rainforests
  • Oceans
  • Animals
  • Environment
  • Business
  • Solutions
  • For Kids
  • DONATE
  • Impact
  • More
    Language
  • 中文 (Chinese)
  • Deutsch (German)
  • English
  • Español (Spanish)
  • Français (French)
  • Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
  • Italiano (Italian)
  • 日本語 (Japanese)
  • Brasil (Portuguese)
  • India (हिंदी)
  • Philippines

Freight train project that railroads Indigenous rights still on track

The “Grainway” freight train project cutting through the Brazilian Amazon is expected to receive its first environmental license next month. by Jennifer Ann Thomas on 16 March 2021 | Translated by Maya Johnson

Mongabay Series: Amazon Infrastructure

  • A controversial project to build a rail line for transporting soybeans and other commodities through Indigenous lands in the Brazilian Amazon may get its environmental license as soon as April.
  • Prosecutors in the state of Pará, where the line will terminate at the Miritituba river port, have filed a court request for a suspension of the project until prior consultation with the affected Indigenous communities have been carried out.
  • The request seeks to challenge the project on its economic viability, with prosecutors arguing that without detailed data on costs and compensation measures, there is no way of knowing how the project will impact on public coffers.
  • This is the first time that prosecutors have highlighted a project’s viability to seek its suspension.

A controversial freight railway line that would cut through Indigenous lands in the Brazilian Amazon looks set to be approved for construction by the federal government as soon as April, despite a lawsuit pending against it by local prosecutors.

The EF-170 railroad, known as the Ferrogrão, or “Grainway,” is a priority project of the federal government and will run 933 kilometers (580 miles) from the municipality of Sinop, in Mato Grosso state, to Miritituba in Pará state. The call for a tender is expected to be released within the first quarter of 2021, and the project is expected to be granted its environmental license in April.

All the freight traffic between the two cities currently flows through the BR-163 highway, bringing produce from Mato Grosso north to the river terminal in Pará. At present, though, more than 70% of Mato Grosso’s harvest is trucked southeast to the Atlantic ports of Santos and Paranaguá for export. With the railroad, the government aims to avoid this arduous step of the journey, instead sending commodities like soybean and corn to the transshipment terminal in Miritituba and onto ships sailing out to the Atlantic via the Tapajós, Tocantins and Amazon rivers. Aside from grains, the government also plans to transport soybean oil, fertilizers, sugar, ethanol, and petroleum products.

While the railroad is considered vital for grain shipping, the way the federal government is pushing ahead with the project has raised concerns. In particular, the Federal Prosecutor’s Office (MPF) in Pará has challenged the government’s failure to seek the free, prior and informed consent of the Indigenous peoples through whose lands the railway would pass. In October, the MPF and five civil society organizations filed a request with the Federal Court of Accounts, the government accountability office, for the precautionary suspension of the privatization process and for the call for tender to be stopped.

Public prosecutor Felipe Moura Palha said the fact that the federal government has violated the Indigenous communities’ right to participate in discussions about the project risks imposing significant economic losses in the future. “This is the first time that the MPF has called on the Court of Accounts to analyze a large project in the Amazon with an eye on economics,” he said.

The MPF says the lack of data on the real environmental impacts of the project means the cost of compensation could be greater than imagined and possibly lead to losses from the public coffers. “We maintain that prior consultation, analysis and the effect on Indigenous communities in the economic viability analysis for the project is essential,” Palha said.

A public hearing held with Indigenous people in Brasília in 2018 to debate the lack of consultation mechanisms with the populations affected by construction of the Grainway. Image by Roque de Sá/Agência Senado.

In response to the request filed by the MPF, the court notified the National Land Transportation Agency (ANTT), the federal regulator for railway and highway infrastructure, and Funai, the federal agency for Indigenous affairs, to carry out consultations with Indigenous peoples along the route of the planned rail line. But even then, the federal government has played foul, according to the MPF: prosecutors allege that the government’s Special Secretariat of the Partnerships and Investments Program (SE-PPI) tried to improperly entice an Indigenous Munduruku leader to act on behalf of the tribe.

The Munduruku people, with a population of about 13,700 occupying territories along the Tapajós River, have their own political organizations. According to the MPF, the government sought out a single person to be “the speaker granted representation to articulate the interests of his people.” On Dec. 14, the MPF recommended that the prior consultation process also include the project’s impacts on the Indigenous peoples in the state of Mato Grosso who would be directly or indirectly affected by the Grainway. The recommendation was aimed at Funai and IBAMA, the federal environmental protection agency.

Indigenous people ignored

Melillo Dinis is a lawyer with the Instituto Kabu, representing 12 communities of the Mẽbêngôkre-Kayapó people, including some 12,000 Kayapós. He said the Indigenous people have yet to form an opinion about the Grainway because the project has not yet even been presented to them. Dinis said there are currenty three issues under debate: the right to prior consultation and fulfillment of Indigenous protocol, neither of which were acknowledged by the government of President Jair Bolsonaro; the need for thorough social and environmental evaluation of the degradation, deforestation and growing tensions over territory in the region; and the fact that representatives of governmental agencies affirmed that Indigenous rights would be respected but did not carry out their promises.

“The context that has been presented to us until now is completely disrespectful of Indigenous peoples,” he said. “They have been living here for around 10,000 years. We will fight until the end.”

Dinis noted that the project has been dragged out over previous administrations; the Grainway was proposed in 2016, under the watch of then-president Dilma Rousseff, who was later that year impeached and replaced by Michel Temer. Temer was succeeded by Bolsonaro.

“Before, they would listen to us but wouldn’t pay any attention,” Dinis said of the Rousseff and Temer administrations. “This administration won’t even listen to us. So the outcome is the same.”

The Grainway will run 933 kilometers from Sinop in Mato Gross state to Miritutuba in Pará state, avoiding the arduous overland route to southeastern ports and instead shipping produce, particulary soybeans, down the Amazon’s various rivers. Image by Walbron Siqueira via Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0).

Prosecutor Palha said there’s no way to stipulate a ceiling on spending on the project without knowing how much to allocate for environmental compensation. “We are not opposed to development projects,” he said. “Our request is: carry out the prior consultation before claiming that the project is viable so it can be discussed.”

He cited the case of the Belo Monte dam in the state of Pará as an example. A significant decline in the flow rate of the Xingu River now threatens the viability of the dam, raising the prospect of new power plants, likely fired by fossil fuels, needing to be built.

“We want to avoid this situation with the Grainway, having a project already installed that hasn’t been properly planned,” Palha said. “This is why the Court of Accounts is carrying out an unprecedented economics analysis.”

Controversy over the Grainway began in 2016 when it was announced that studies would be carried out to make the project viable. In 2018, Mongabay reported that the Kayapó people had expressed their concern over the potential threats posed by the railway and had written a letter to the ANTT. In it, tribal chief Anhe Kayapó said: “The Grainway cannot be built without reinforcing controls, protection and vigilance in the Conservation Units and Indigenous Lands [along its route].”

 
Banner image: The environmental license for the Grainway project could come as soon as this April. Image courtesy of the Brazilian National Land Transporation Agency (ANTT).

This story was first reported by Mongabay’s Brazil team and published here on our Brazil site on Feb. 26, 2021.

Article published by Maria Salazar
Agriculture, Environment, Environmental Law, Environmental Policy, Indigenous Peoples, Infrastructure, International Trade, Social Justice, Soy, Threats To Rainforests, Threats To The Amazon, Traditional People

Print button
PRINT

Special series

Forest Trackers

  • Mennonite colonies linked to deforestation of Indigenous territories and protected areas in Paraguay
  • Deforestation on the rise in Quintana Roo, Mexico, as Mennonite communities move in
  • Logged and loaded: Cambodian prison official suspected in massive legalized logging operation
  • Bolivian national park hit hard by forest fires in 2022, satellite data show
Forest Trackers
More articles

Oceans

  • ‘Manta grid’ provides a ray of hope against industrial bycatch threat
  • As oceans warm, temperate reef species edge closer to extinction, study shows
  • Can we control marine invaders by eating them?
  • Sea level rise looms, even for the best-prepared country on Earth
Oceans
More articles

Amazon Conservation

  • RSPO suspension of Brazil palm oil exporter tied to Mongabay land-grabbing report
  • Tropical forest regeneration offsets 26% of carbon emissions from deforestation
  • Plan to mine ‘clean energy’ metals in Colombian Amazon splits communities
  • Peru congress debates stripping isolated Indigenous people of land and protections
Amazon Conservation
More articles

Land rights and extractives

  • Will clean-energy minerals provoke a shift in how mining is done in Africa?
  • Plan to mine ‘clean energy’ metals in Colombian Amazon splits communities
  • Peru congress debates stripping isolated Indigenous people of land and protections
  • Brazil tackles illegal miners, but finds their mercury legacy harder to erase
Land rights and extractives
More articles

Endangered Environmentalists

  • ‘You don’t kill people to protect forests’: New Thai parks chief raises alarm
  • Vietnam’s environmental NGOs face uncertain status, shrinking civic space
  • ‘We lost the biggest ally’: Nelly Marubo on her friend Bruno Pereira’s legacy
  • Murders of 2 Pataxó leaders prompt Ministry of Indigenous Peoples to launch crisis office
Endangered Environmentalists
More articles

Indonesia's Forest Guardians

  • Pioneer agroforester Ermi, 73, rolls back the years in Indonesia’s Gorontalo
  • After 20 years and thousands of trees planted, Kalimantan’s veteran forester persists
  • Aziil Anwar, Indonesian coral-based mangrove grower, dies at 64
  • A utopia of clean air and wet peat amid Sumatra’s forest fire ‘hell’
Indonesia's Forest Guardians
More articles

Conservation Effectiveness

  • For key Bangladesh wetland, bid for Ramsar status is no guarantee of protection
  • Biodiversity, human rights safeguards crucial to nature-based solutions: Critics
  • Protecting canids from planet-wide threats offers ecological opportunities
  • Mangrove forest loss is slowing toward a halt, new report shows
Conservation Effectiveness
More articles

Southeast Asian infrastructure

  • Robust river governance key to restoring Mekong River vitality in face of dams
  • As hydropower dams quell the Mekong’s life force, what are the costs?
  • As Indonesia’s new capital takes shape, risks to wider Borneo come into focus
  • Tunnel collapse at dam project in orangutan habitat claims yet another life
Southeast Asian infrastructure
More articles

About Mongabay

Mongabay is a U.S.-based non-profit conservation and environmental science news platform. Our EIN or tax ID is 45-3714703.

Information

  • Mongabay.org
  • Tropical Forest Network
  • Wild Madagascar
  • Selva Tropicales
  • Mongabay Indonesia
  • Mongabay India

Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Information

  • About Mongabay
  • Submissions
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright & Terms of Use

© 2023 Copyright Conservation news

you're currently offline