- According to a new study, published in the journal Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment last week, Burmese pythons in Florida are just one example of the hundreds of non-native and invasive species that are harming native species and ecosystems around the world thanks to the multibillion-dollar exotic pet trade.
- “The volume of vertebrate animals that are traded worldwide is shocking, even to relatively seasoned invasion biologists,” the study’s lead author, Julie L. Lockwood, a professor at Rutgers University–New Brunswick in the United States, said in a statement. “The market in exotic pets has grown considerably since the 1970s, and so I don’t think most of us fully grasped how expansive the trade has become.”
- Lockwood and colleagues note in the study that research has shown that, of the 140 non‐native reptiles and amphibians known to have been introduced in Florida so far, close to 85 percent arrived via the pet trade.
Last April, a male Burmese python led researchers at the Big Cypress National Preserve in the Florida Everglades straight to a 17-foot female that was carrying 73 developing eggs.
The researchers had outfitted the male python with a radio transmitter, then let nature take its course. The male, of course, was on the hunt for breeding female pythons — and so were the researchers. Burmese pythons, as their name suggests, are native to South Asia and are an invasive species in Florida. The constricting snakes can cause serious harm to the local ecosystem and have a devastating impact on biodiversity. The 17-foot female found in April was euthanized and its eggs destroyed.
That may sound like harsh treatment, but a 2012 study found that the Burmese python population in Florida has exploded since 2000 and occupied an ever-growing geographic range. That has had serious impacts for local biodiversity: “Before 2000, mammals were encountered frequently during nocturnal road surveys within [Everglades National Park]. In contrast, road surveys totaling 56,971 [kilometers] from 2003–2011 documented a 99.3% decrease in the frequency of raccoon observations, decreases of 98.9% and 87.5% for opossum and bobcat observations, respectively, and failed to detect rabbits.” The authors of the study add that the results of the road surveys also showed mammal species are more abundant in areas that Burmese pythons have not yet reached.
The snakes were originally brought to the US via the pet trade, then released into the wild — probably once the owners realized that their new pet could grow to as much as 23 feet long. According to a new study, published in the journal Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment last week, Burmese pythons in Florida are just one example of the hundreds of non-native and invasive species that are harming native species and ecosystems around the world thanks to the multibillion-dollar exotic pet trade. And the researchers behind that study say the number of invasive species will most likely continue to rise.
“The volume of vertebrate animals that are traded worldwide is shocking, even to relatively seasoned invasion biologists,” the study’s lead author, Julie L. Lockwood, a professor at Rutgers University–New Brunswick in the United States, said in a statement. “The market in exotic pets has grown considerably since the 1970s, and so I don’t think most of us fully grasped how expansive the trade has become. It is very clear that the species imported into the U.S. at the highest volume (number of individuals), for example, are most likely to have non-native or invasive populations here.”
Non-native species can be accidentally introduced to new geographic regions when animals hop a ride on ships and airplanes transporting commodities and people. But Lockwood and team found that tens of millions of animals comprising thousands of different vertebrate species are intentionally shipped internationally and domestically every year to meet the growing demand for exotic pets (those without a long history of domestication, unlike dogs, cats, and horses). That has “led to the establishment of several hundred non‐native and invasive vertebrate animal species globally,” the researchers write.
Lockwood and colleagues note in the study that research has shown that, of the 140 non‐native reptiles and amphibians known to have been introduced in Florida so far, close to 85 percent arrived via the pet trade. Meanwhile, 70 percent of invasive mammal species introduced in Brazil over the past three decades were also the result of the pet trade, and escaped exotic pets have been found to be the primary source of new non‐native species of amphibians, reptiles, mammals, and birds established in the EU.
In order to develop effective policies that will stop pets from invading and harming ecosystems to which they are not native, the researchers say there are gaps in our understanding of the exotic pet trade that must be filled. “The challenge is complex, given that a thorough understanding will necessarily include social perceptions, market forces, and ecology,” Lockwood and her co-authors write. “Due to the industry’s socioenvironmental scope, concerted interdisciplinary efforts are required to understand these aspects of the exotic pet trade in order to devise and implement strategies that mitigate its potential harmful impacts.”
In particular, a better understanding of the socioeconomic forces driving the massive growth in the exotic pet trade is crucial, as is learning more about what causes owners to release their pets into the wild, which vary based on whether the pets were purchased legally or illegally and the cultural pet-keeping traditions of specific regions, per the study.
“Consumers should be very careful what species they choose to keep as a pet, making sure that they choose one they can care for throughout the pet’s life,” Lockwood said. “They should buy from a reputable seller who sustainably sources their animals and follows industry best practices for the care of their animals. If an owner can no longer care for a pet, they should talk to a local pet shop owner, their veterinarian or even state wildlife biologists and ask for options for how to relinquish ownership in a responsible manner.”
CITATIONS
• Dorcas, M. E., Willson, J. D., Reed, R. N., Snow, R. W., Rochford, M. R., Miller, M. A., … & Hart, K. M. (2012). Severe mammal declines coincide with proliferation of invasive Burmese pythons in Everglades National Park. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(7), 2418-2422. doi:10.1073/pnas.1115226109
• Lockwood, J. L., Welbourne, D. J., Romagosa, C. M., Cassey, P., Mandrak, N. E., Strecker, A., … & Tlusty, M. F. (2019). When pets become pests: the role of the exotic pet trade in producing invasive vertebrate animals. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. doi:10.1002/fee.2059
FEEDBACK: Use this form to send a message to the author of this post. If you want to post a public comment, you can do that at the bottom of the page.
