<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" >

	<channel>
		<title>Conservation news</title>
		<atom:link href="https://news.mongabay.com/feed/?feedtype=bulletpoints&#038;post_type=post&#038;topic=carbon-tax" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>https://news.mongabay.com/list/carbon-tax/</link>
		<description>Environmental science and conservation news</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:54:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>

 
				<item>
					<title>Oil surge sharpens calls for Indonesia to shift away from fossil fuels</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/04/oil-surge-sharpens-calls-for-indonesia-to-shift-away-from-fossil-fuels/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/04/oil-surge-sharpens-calls-for-indonesia-to-shift-away-from-fossil-fuels/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>01 Apr 2026 03:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Hans Nicholas Jong]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Hans Nicholas Jong]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2026/04/01031350/5A269589-C332-4BC2-B240-4088D4141843-768x512.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=316691</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Asia, Indonesia, and Southeast Asia]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Biofuels, Carbon Tax, Clean Energy, Climate Change, Coal, Conflict, El Nino, Energy, Fossil Fuels, Just Transition, Oil, Palm Oil, Politics, and Renewable Energy]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Indonesia faces rising fiscal and economic pressure as global oil prices surge amid the U.S.-Israel war on Iran, exposing its heavy reliance on imported fossil fuels.<br />- Analysts say the crisis underscores the need to accelerate renewable energy development, which could reduce exposure to volatile global markets and improve long-term economic stability.<br />- Despite this, the government is also boosting coal output and exploring expanded biofuel use — moves that critics warn could undermine climate goals and create new environmental risks.<br />- Civil society groups are calling for windfall taxes on fossil fuel companies to fund a just energy transition, arguing current policies risk deepening inequality and dependence on extractive industries.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[JAKARTA — As the U.S.-Israel war on Iran drives oil prices above $100 a barrel and disrupts global supply routes, Indonesia is once again confronting the costs of its dependence on fossil fuels — with growing calls not only to accelerate its renewable energy adoption, but also to make oil and gas companies help pay for the transition. The crisis is already testing the country’s energy system. Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint for global oil flows, have constrained supply, sending prices sharply higher from around $70 a barrel before the war began at the end of February. For Indonesia, the impact has been immediate. The country of 280 million people has been a net oil importer since 2003, and its economy remains heavily dependent on fossil fuels to power transport, industry and electricity. That dependence is now translating into rising fiscal pressure, currency risks and broader economic vulnerability. Yet the same shock is also sharpening calls to speed up the transition to renewable energy, even as policymakers move to secure more fossil fuel supplies and ramp up coal output at home. The ongoing global energy crisis, which the International Energy Agency (IEA) describes as the worst in recorded history, has laid bare the risks of Indonesia’s energy mix. The country consumes around 1.5 million barrels of oil per day but produces less than 700,000 barrels, leaving it highly reliant on imports. That exposure carries a direct cost. An analysis by the Institute for Development of Economics and&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2026/04/oil-surge-sharpens-calls-for-indonesia-to-shift-away-from-fossil-fuels/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/04/oil-surge-sharpens-calls-for-indonesia-to-shift-away-from-fossil-fuels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-316691</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Brazil passes law to cap emissions and regulate carbon market</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2024/12/brazil-passes-law-to-cap-emissions-and-regulate-carbon-market/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2024/12/brazil-passes-law-to-cap-emissions-and-regulate-carbon-market/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>16 Dec 2024 22:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Shanna Hanbury]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Shreya Dasgupta]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/12/16222104/de93b2df-0320-4f2e-bf98-1b69cc541ff0-768x512-1.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?post_type=short-article&#038;p=291757</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Brazil, Latin America, and South America]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Air Pollution, Carbon Emissions, Carbon Market, Carbon Tax, Climate Change, Environment, Environmental Law, Indigenous Rights, Politics, and Pollution]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Brazil has passed a law to cap greenhouse gas emissions from companies and set up a nationwide system to trade carbon credits. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva signed the landmark bill Dec. 12. “The main goal of the law is to position Brazil as a leader in protecting the climate system for the benefit [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Brazil has passed a law to cap greenhouse gas emissions from companies and set up a nationwide system to trade carbon credits. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva signed the landmark bill Dec. 12. “The main goal of the law is to position Brazil as a leader in protecting the climate system for the benefit of our population,” said senator Leila Barros, who led the bill in the Senate. With the law now sanctioned, Brazil will join the short list of countries, which includes China, Mexico and Kazakhstan and most EU member states, with a nationwide regulated carbon emissions system. The Brazilian government and the law’s proponents in the industrial sector say a regulated market will encourage companies to adopt low-carbon technologies and innovate toward greener production methods. The market will also generate an estimated $7 billion a year, Brazil’s Green Party said. Each carbon credit is worth 1 metric ton of emissions, and any company that emits more than 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide, or the equivalent in other gases, will need to report their emissions to the newly formed Brazilian Emissions Trading System, which has six years to be set up. If companies exceed their emissions quota, they will need to buy carbon credits from companies that are below their allocated limit and submit a plan to reduce emissions. Fines for not complying will be largely rerouted toward Brazil’s national climate change fund and administrative costs, with 5% of the fines destined to compensate Indigenous communities for&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2024/12/brazil-passes-law-to-cap-emissions-and-regulate-carbon-market/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2024/12/brazil-passes-law-to-cap-emissions-and-regulate-carbon-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-291757</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Not so fast, experts warn as Dhaka tries to clear the air with car tax and bus ban</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2023/06/not-so-fast-experts-warn-as-dhaka-tries-to-clear-the-air-with-car-tax-and-bus-ban/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2023/06/not-so-fast-experts-warn-as-dhaka-tries-to-clear-the-air-with-car-tax-and-bus-ban/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>16 Jun 2023 09:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Kamran Reza Chowdhury]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Abu Siddique]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2023/06/16081143/dhaka-traffic-1-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=269891</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Asia, Bangladesh, and South Asia]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Air Pollution, Carbon Tax, Cities, Environment, Environmental Law, Governance, Health, Industry, Law, Pollution, and Public Health]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- With one motor vehicle for every one of its more than 20 million inhabitants, Dhaka has grown into one of the most polluted and congested cities in the world.<br />- Policymakers want to change this with a pair of proposals: Slapping a carbon tax on multiple car ownership, and removing aging buses and trucks from the city’s roads.<br />- However, experts and studies point out that the biggest contributor to the city’s dire air quality isn’t vehicle emissions, but the burning of straw for brick kilns.<br />- They also warn that abruptly slashing the city’s bus fleet would severely impact residents, for whom the bus network is the main mode of transportation.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[DHAKA — Authorities in Bangladesh have rolled out two schemes to combat air pollution in the capital Dhaka, one of the world’s fastest growing mega cities and one of the most polluted. On June 1, Finance Minister A.H.M. Mustafa Kamal proposed in his budget proposal to parliament a new tax on multiple car ownership. This would serve as a disincentive for people to own more than one car, and thus help reduce both the exhaust emissions and traffic congestion that have long plagued Dhaka. Owning more than one car is widely viewed in Bangladesh as a matter of prestige and social status. But the consequences of having so many cars on the roads include notoriously bad air pollution and thousands of deaths due to road accidents every year. That proposal follows on the announcement in late May by the Bangladesh Road Transport Authority (BRTA) that buses older than 20 years and trucks older than 25 years will be taken off the roads to improve air quality. Sitangshu Shekhar Biswas, the BRTA director of engineering, told Mongabay this would affect some 60,000 buses and trucks. The consequences of having too many cars on the roads include notoriously bad air pollution and thousands of deaths due to road accidents every year. Image by Muhammad Mostafigur Rahman. Proposed carbon tax The finance minister’s proposal has received widespread support in parliament and from environmentalists, civil society organizations and regular Dhaka residents, who say they capital’s streets are clogged with an unnecessarily high number of&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2023/06/not-so-fast-experts-warn-as-dhaka-tries-to-clear-the-air-with-car-tax-and-bus-ban/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2023/06/not-so-fast-experts-warn-as-dhaka-tries-to-clear-the-air-with-car-tax-and-bus-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-269891</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Economists, conservationists, political leaders urge adoption of carbon tax to halt tropical deforestation</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2020/02/economists-conservationists-political-leaders-urge-adoption-of-carbon-tax-to-halt-tropical-deforestation/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2020/02/economists-conservationists-political-leaders-urge-adoption-of-carbon-tax-to-halt-tropical-deforestation/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>13 Feb 2020 17:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Mongabay.com]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Mike Gaworecki]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2020/02/13172636/resplendent-quetzal-in-costa-rica_1210px-768x451.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=227135</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Global]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Agroforestry, Biodiversity, Biodiversity Hotspots, Carbon Emissions, Carbon Sequestration, Carbon Tax, Climate Change, Conservation, Conservation Finance, Deforestation, Emission Reduction, Environment, Forest Carbon, Forests, Global Warming, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use Change, Mitigation, Rainforests, Tropical Deforestation, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- A comment piece published in Nature yesterday urges tropical countries to adopt a tax on carbon emissions in order to halt global warming, species loss, and deforestation.<br />- The authors of the piece include Edward B. Barbier, a distinguished professor of economics at Colorado State University in the US; Ricardo Lozano, Colombia’s Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development; Carlos Manuel Rodríguez, Costa Rica’s Minister of Environment and Energy; and Sebastian Troëng, executive vice-president of US-based NGO Conservation International.<br />- “Tropical deforestation and land-use change must be halted to safeguard the climate and global biodiversity,” the authors write in Nature. “The widespread adoption of a tropical carbon tax is a practical way forward.”<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[A comment piece published in Nature yesterday urges tropical countries to adopt a tax on carbon emissions in order to halt global warming, species loss, and deforestation. The authors of the piece include Edward B. Barbier, a distinguished professor of economics at Colorado State University in the US; Ricardo Lozano, Colombia’s Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development; Carlos Manuel Rodríguez, Costa Rica’s Minister of Environment and Energy; and Sebastian Troëng, executive vice-president of US-based NGO Conservation International. “Tropical deforestation and land-use change must be halted to safeguard the climate and global biodiversity,” the authors write in Nature. “The widespread adoption of a tropical carbon tax is a practical way forward.” Some 70% of the world’s biodiversity is found in 17 “megadiverse” countries, the authors note. Thirteen of those megadiverse countries also contain tropical forests, but they collectively lost nearly 7.3 million hectares (more than 18 million acres) of forest in 2018, “an area roughly the size of Panama.” The authors add: “According to our estimates, that represented nearly 30% of global deforestation and may have released about 7% of worldwide carbon emissions.” Research has shown that so-called “natural climate solutions” — conservation, restoration, and improved land management activities that boost carbon storage or avoid greenhouse gas emissions from forests, wetlands, grasslands, and agricultural lands — can provide 37% of the global warming mitigation needed between now and 2030 to keep temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius. But in many tropical countries, funds for these natural climate solutions is lacking. That’s where&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2020/02/economists-conservationists-political-leaders-urge-adoption-of-carbon-tax-to-halt-tropical-deforestation/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2020/02/economists-conservationists-political-leaders-urge-adoption-of-carbon-tax-to-halt-tropical-deforestation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-227135</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Facing resource crisis, Indonesia charts a ‘green development’ course</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2018/06/facing-resource-crisis-indonesia-charts-a-green-development-course/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2018/06/facing-resource-crisis-indonesia-charts-a-green-development-course/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>19 Jun 2018 11:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Hans Nicholas Jong]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Hans Nicholas Jong]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2018/03/09040759/mongabay-sampah-pantai-kuta-3-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=207349</guid>

											<reporting-project>
							<![CDATA[Jokowi Commitments]]>
						</reporting-project>
					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Asia, Indonesia, and Southeast Asia]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Agriculture, carbon, Carbon Emissions, Carbon Market, Carbon Tax, Climate Change, Environment, Environmental Policy, Governance, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Plantations, Politics, Pollution, Pulp And Paper, and Sustainable Development]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
											<grant>
							<![CDATA[DFFF2019]]>
						</grant>
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Faced with housing, water and food shortages and massive natural destruction, Indonesia is developing a five-year development plan that will become the country&#8217;s first low-carbon development initiative.<br />- Under the new plan, the government hopes to keep future development projects within the limits of the country&#8217;s ecological “carrying capacity” of fast-depleting natural resources.<br />- The green development plan also aims to attract green investment, which is crucial if the country wants to meet its stated target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 29 percent by 2030 from the business-as-usual scenario.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[SINGAPORE — Indonesia’s development model over the decades has been to exploit its abundant natural resources to feed a population that’s now ballooned to 260 million and fuel an economy that’s among the world’s top 20. So while it boasts some of the last great swaths of tropical rainforest anywhere in the world, it has also been razing them at rates exceeding the deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Similarly, Indonesia has some of the richest marine fishing areas of any country, yet trails only China in the amount of plastic waste that it dumps into the ocean. And though it spans an area a fifth of the United States, much of its economic activity and more than half its population is concentrated in a single island the size of North Carolina. Cognizant that its natural resources can’t sustain the current pace of its development trajectory, the government is now ushering in a new development blueprint that tries to keep within this ecological “carrying capacity.” “We realize that the degradation of environmental quality has [reached a] critical level,” Bambang Brodjonegoro, Indonesia’s minister for national development planning, said in his opening speech at the Sustainable Resources Dialogue in Singapore last month. “We need to develop a proper policy and strategy starting from now. It’s time for us from now on to consider the carrying capacity [of our resources].” The consequences of the current rate of development and destruction of the environment have been severe. Indonesia faces housing, water and food shortages. For&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2018/06/facing-resource-crisis-indonesia-charts-a-green-development-course/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2018/06/facing-resource-crisis-indonesia-charts-a-green-development-course/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-207349</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Big surprise in the greenhouse: study finds economic costs of climate change hugely underestimated</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2015/03/big-surprise-in-the-greenhouse-study-finds-economic-costs-of-climate-change-hugely-underestimated/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2015/03/big-surprise-in-the-greenhouse-study-finds-economic-costs-of-climate-change-hugely-underestimated/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>30 Mar 2015 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Glenn Scherer]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Morgan Erickson-Davis]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2015/03/big-surprise-in-the-greenhouse-study-finds-economic-costs-of-climate-change-hugely-underestimated/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Africa]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Tax, Climate Change, Economics, Ecosystem Services, Environment, Global Warming, Green, Lakes, and Mitigation]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Aerial view of Egypt&#8217;s drylands. Research has linked a changing climate with the downfall of Egypt&#8217;s Old Kingdom 4,200 years ago. Photo by Rhett A. Butler. Look at most climate change projection graphs and you will see a smoothly rising red line of increasing temperature, melting ice and other impacts. But climate does not work [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Aerial view of Egypt&#8217;s drylands. Research has linked a changing climate with the downfall of Egypt&#8217;s Old Kingdom 4,200 years ago. Photo by Rhett A. Butler. Look at most climate change projection graphs and you will see a smoothly rising red line of increasing temperature, melting ice and other impacts. But climate does not work that way. Studies of the paleoclimate record indicate that when heat energy is rapidly added to the atmosphere &#8212; as humans are doing today &#8212; the climate can experience “tipping points,” with abrupt shifts and potentially disastrous results. Researchers who have studied economic climate change impacts have until recently based their cost-benefit analyses on that smoothly rising line &#8212; resulting in relatively small estimated economic losses. Now a group of researchers has taken climate change tipping points into account in their analyses published today in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, finding that such abrupt events could be highly disruptive and destructive to the global economy. The international research team found that previous cost-benefit assessments of global climate policy may be significantly underestimating the economic need for controlling climate change. “Most current cost-benefit analyses of climate change suggest [that] global climate policy should be relatively weak,” write the researchers. “However, relatively few studies account for the market or nonmarket impacts of passing environmental tipping points that cause abrupt and irreversible damages.” Climate tipping points are acknowledged and expected by scientists. There will, they note, likely be moments in the decades ahead when climate forcings&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2015/03/big-surprise-in-the-greenhouse-study-finds-economic-costs-of-climate-change-hugely-underestimated/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2015/03/big-surprise-in-the-greenhouse-study-finds-economic-costs-of-climate-change-hugely-underestimated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-23924</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>The best of the worst: fossil-fuel extractors pave the way for the low-carbon revolution</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2014/03/the-best-of-the-worst-fossil-fuel-extractors-pave-the-way-for-the-low-carbon-revolution/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2014/03/the-best-of-the-worst-fossil-fuel-extractors-pave-the-way-for-the-low-carbon-revolution/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>26 Mar 2014 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Owen Reynolds]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Jeremy Hance]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2014/03/the-best-of-the-worst-fossil-fuel-extractors-pave-the-way-for-the-low-carbon-revolution/</guid>

					
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Emissions, Carbon Market, Carbon Tax, Climate Change, Corporate Environmental Transgressors, Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporations, Economics, Energy, Environment, Fossil Fuels, Global Warming, Green, Happy-upbeat Environmental, and Mitigation]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[At the end of last year, the world got some good news on the green business front concerning a very unlikely set of participants. A recent market review revealed that Exxon Mobil, Chevron, BP, ConocoPhillips, Royal Dutch Shell, Duke Energy, PG&#038;E Corporation, American Electric Power Company, ConAgra Foods and Walmart, among others, are including shadow [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[At the end of last year, the world got some good news on the green business front concerning a very unlikely set of participants. A recent market review revealed that Exxon Mobil, Chevron, BP, ConocoPhillips, Royal Dutch Shell, Duke Energy, PG&#038;E Corporation, American Electric Power Company, ConAgra Foods and Walmart, among others, are including shadow carbon prices in their forecasts. This indicates that these hugely-profitable multinational corporations expect that carbon emissions will have a price put on its head soon. Carbon dioxide is the most common greenhouse gas, and consequently, has the largest effect on global warming. And the higher carbon is priced, the more likely companies will be to control and reduce their emissions. So, the more companies find financial reasons to curb their carbon emissions, the lower their global warming impact will be. But does the grouping above sound familiar? It should. These companies represent some of the most controversial industries in American history. Dominating the oil, gas, electric generation, agriculture and retail industries, each of these behemoths wield unfathomable influence over markets and politics. So, by being financially prepared to fork over large sums of money in order to emit carbon, their influence may have positive consequences. Wind farm in the Dominican Republic. Photo by: Tiffany Roufs. Carbon can be priced through cap-and-trade credits or carbon taxes. Carbon credits represent one ton of carbon dioxide emissions and are traded in a commodities market similar to grains, cotton or metals. If the limit or cap on carbon emissions&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2014/03/the-best-of-the-worst-fossil-fuel-extractors-pave-the-way-for-the-low-carbon-revolution/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2014/03/the-best-of-the-worst-fossil-fuel-extractors-pave-the-way-for-the-low-carbon-revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-25483</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Top scientists propose ambitious plans to safeguard world from devastating climate change</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/12/top-scientists-propose-ambitious-plans-to-safeguard-world-from-devastating-climate-change/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/12/top-scientists-propose-ambitious-plans-to-safeguard-world-from-devastating-climate-change/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>05 Dec 2013 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Jeremy Hance]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Jeremy Hance]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2013/12/top-scientists-propose-ambitious-plans-to-safeguard-world-from-devastating-climate-change/</guid>

					
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Emissions, Carbon Tax, Climate Change, Climate Science, Coal, Energy, Energy Efficiency, Environment, Fossil Fuels, Global Environmental Crisis, Global Warming, Governance, Green, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Happy-upbeat Environmental, Mitigation, Natural Gas, Nuclear Power, Oil, Politics, Renewable Energy, Sea Levels, and Sustainability]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[World must aim for one degrees Celsius warming, instead of two say leading scientists. Two degrees is too much: that&#8217;s the conclusion of a landmark new paper by top economists and climatologists, including James Hansen formerly of NASA. The paper, appearing in the open-access journal PLoS ONE, argues that global society must aim for only [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[World must aim for one degrees Celsius warming, instead of two say leading scientists. Two degrees is too much: that&#8217;s the conclusion of a landmark new paper by top economists and climatologists, including James Hansen formerly of NASA. The paper, appearing in the open-access journal PLoS ONE, argues that global society must aim for only one degree Celsius of warming above pre-industrial levels to avoid the worst impact of climate change, and not the two degrees Celsius agreed on by the world&#8217;s governments. But given that the world&#8217;s governments are not yet on track to even achieve the two degree target, how could we lock in just one? A combination of renewable energy, nuclear power, and, most importantly, a rising price on carbon emissions, according to the eighteen scientists. &#8220;Rapid emissions reduction is required to restore Earth’s energy balance and avoid ocean heat uptake that would practically guarantee irreversible effects,&#8221; the scientists write. &#8220;Continuation of high fossil fuel emissions, given current knowledge of the consequences, would be an act of extraordinary witting intergenerational injustice.&#8221; Global temperatures have already risen approximately 0.8 degrees Celsius. Graph courtesy of Hansen et al. The scientists argue that allowing the climate to warm two degrees Celsius would lead to massive and devastating impacts, including rising sea levels that could hit six meters above current levels within a few hundred years, essentially swamping the world&#8217;s coastal populations. Evidence for this lies in the Eemian period, when global temperatures were around 2 degrees Celsius warmer than today.&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2013/12/top-scientists-propose-ambitious-plans-to-safeguard-world-from-devastating-climate-change/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/12/top-scientists-propose-ambitious-plans-to-safeguard-world-from-devastating-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-25968</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>60,000 protest in Australia to keep carbon price</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/11/60000-protest-in-australia-to-keep-carbon-price/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/11/60000-protest-in-australia-to-keep-carbon-price/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>18 Nov 2013 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Jeremy Hance]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Jeremy Hance]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2013/11/60000-protest-in-australia-to-keep-carbon-price/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Australia]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Activism, Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Emissions, Carbon Tax, Climate Change, Environment, Global Environmental Crisis, Global Warming, Green, Mitigation, Politics, and Protests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Around 60,000 Australians marched yesterday across the country calling on their government not to go backwards on climate action, according to organizers. Australia has taken a sudden U-turn on climate policy with the election of Prime Minister Tony Abbott in September, including legislation to end its carbon pricing, cutting funding to renewable energies, and obstructing [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Around 60,000 Australians marched yesterday across the country calling on their government not to go backwards on climate action, according to organizers. Australia has taken a sudden U-turn on climate policy with the election of Prime Minister Tony Abbott in September, including legislation to end its carbon pricing, cutting funding to renewable energies, and obstructing progress at the ongoing UN Climate Summit in Warsaw. Abbott, who has expressed skepticism of anthropogenic climate change in the past, ran in part on ending Australia&#8217;s carbon price which only into effect in 2012. Last week he introduced new legislation to that effect, saying, &#8220;No one should be in any doubt—the government is repealing the carbon tax in full.&#8221; The fledgling program sets a price on carbon for the nation&#8217;s top 300 emitters. &#8220;The simple truth is this: that we cannot leave a matter as important as climate change to the fickleness and whim of Australia&#8217;s politicians,&#8221; Tim Flannery with the Climate Council told an estimated 30,000 people in Melbourne. &#8220;We must stand up and be counted [and take] every effort to speed the uptake of renewable energy.&#8221; Open pit coal mine in Australia. The nation is the fourth largest producer of coal and the biggest exporter. Photo by: Rhett A. Butler. Previously known as the Climate Commission, the council was a government program with a mandate to provide independent and expert advice on climate change. However, the Abbott administration quickly shuttered the Climate Commission, leading the group to resurrect itself as a non-profit&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2013/11/60000-protest-in-australia-to-keep-carbon-price/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/11/60000-protest-in-australia-to-keep-carbon-price/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-26060</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Is Australia becoming the new Canada in terms of climate inaction?</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/11/is-australia-becoming-the-new-canada-in-terms-of-climate-inaction/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/11/is-australia-becoming-the-new-canada-in-terms-of-climate-inaction/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>14 Nov 2013 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Jeremy Hance]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Jeremy Hance]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2013/11/is-australia-becoming-the-new-canada-in-terms-of-climate-inaction/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Australia, Canada, and North America]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Emissions, Carbon Tax, Climate Change, Climate Change Denial, climate finance, Environment, Global Environmental Crisis, Global Warming, Green, Mitigation, and Politics]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[For many concerned about climate change, Australia has suddenly become the new Canada. With the election of Tony Abbott as Prime Minister in September, the land down under has taken a sudden U-turn on climate policy, including pushing to end its fledgling carbon emissions program which was only implemented in 2012 and cutting funding for [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[For many concerned about climate change, Australia has suddenly become the new Canada. With the election of Tony Abbott as Prime Minister in September, the land down under has taken a sudden U-turn on climate policy, including pushing to end its fledgling carbon emissions program which was only implemented in 2012 and cutting funding for renewable energy. These move come at a time when Australia has just undergone its warmest 12 months on record and suffered from record bushfires. Abbott, who has expressed skepticism of climate change in the past, put forward legislation this week to end Australia&#8217;s landmark carbon pricing. Abbott, who was the head of Australia&#8217;s Liberal Party, ran in part on dismantling the carbon pricing program, which sets a price on carbon emissions for the nation&#8217;s 300 largest emitters, instead replacing it with what has been dubbed a &#8220;direct action plan.&#8221; &#8220;No one should be in any doubt&#8212;the government is repealing the carbon tax in full,&#8221; Abbott said as he introduced the new legislation. &#8220;We are doing what we were elected to do. We have said what we mean and we will do what we say&#8212;the carbon tax goes. It goes.&#8221; Instead of pricing carbon, the new administration proposes to spend $3.2 billion on lowering its carbon emissions by 5 percent from 2000 levels by 2020. However, several organization have said this would be nowhere near enough funding to hit even that target, including Australia&#8217;s own Climate Change Authority. Notably, the Abbott administration has said it intends&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2013/11/is-australia-becoming-the-new-canada-in-terms-of-climate-inaction/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/11/is-australia-becoming-the-new-canada-in-terms-of-climate-inaction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-26076</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Tools against climate change: carbon tax and cap-and-trade</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/09/tools-against-climate-change-carbon-tax-and-cap-and-trade/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/09/tools-against-climate-change-carbon-tax-and-cap-and-trade/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>04 Sep 2013 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Owen Reynolds]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Jeremy Hance]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2013/09/tools-against-climate-change-carbon-tax-and-cap-and-trade/</guid>

					
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Emissions, Carbon Market, Carbon Tax, Climate Change, Commentary, Economics, Energy, Environment, Environmental Law, Finance, Forests, Fossil Fuels, Global Environmental Crisis, Global Warming, Governance, Green, Mitigation, and Politics]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Climate-conscious folk agree that atmospheric carbon dioxide is a key greenhouse gas and a large factor in global climate change. However, there are discrepancies in the methods chosen to address the problem. Some say that carbon emissions should be banned. Some say fossil fuels should be priced. Others say that there are nuances within each. [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Climate-conscious folk agree that atmospheric carbon dioxide is a key greenhouse gas and a large factor in global climate change. However, there are discrepancies in the methods chosen to address the problem. Some say that carbon emissions should be banned. Some say fossil fuels should be priced. Others say that there are nuances within each. Which tools can we realistically use to mitigate climate change and the drastic effects it will have on our world? I should start by saying that I write this from a pragmatic point of view—void of most dogma and limited by reality. Because of the massive economic slow-down that would likely occur from banning fossil fuels, we can safety scratch that plan. Despite the fact that I think they would be effectively banned if prices were high enough, out-right banning carbon emissions today would be disastrous. That leaves us with the option of pricing carbon, which means directly attaching a monetary consequence for using fossil fuels to the activities that require it. This disincentives the use of fossil fuels&#8212;much as cigarette taxes have widely curbed smoking. Additional costs on a product spur individuals and firms to look for alternative inputs, or at the very least, get more out of every barrel of input, i.e. energy efficiency. Attaching the true costs of oil to its uses is a phenomenon economists call &#8220;internalizing externalities.&#8221; Externalities are positive or negative consequences of an activity incorporated into the activity&#8217;s cost structure. The negative externality of burning fossil fuels is&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2013/09/tools-against-climate-change-carbon-tax-and-cap-and-trade/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/09/tools-against-climate-change-carbon-tax-and-cap-and-trade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-26431</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>China delays carbon tax</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/03/china-delays-carbon-tax/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/03/china-delays-carbon-tax/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>07 Mar 2013 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Mongabay.com]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Rhett Butler]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2013/03/china-delays-carbon-tax/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Asia and China]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Air Pollution, Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Emissions, Carbon Tax, Environment, Green, and Mitigation]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Comparison of carbon emissions from six leading countries. Click image to enlarge. China will not introduce a carbon tax in 2013, reports Bloomberg. A carbon tax proposed under the country&#8217;s most recent five-year plan was expected to go into effect in 2011, but Jia Kang, the head of research at China&#8217;s Ministry of Finance, said [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Comparison of carbon emissions from six leading countries. Click image to enlarge. China will not introduce a carbon tax in 2013, reports Bloomberg. A carbon tax proposed under the country&#8217;s most recent five-year plan was expected to go into effect in 2011, but Jia Kang, the head of research at China&#8217;s Ministry of Finance, said the tax will not be introduced this year. The carbon tax is intended to reduce China&#8217;s greenhouse gas emissions, which are the highest in the world and have been outpacing the country&#8217;s breakneck speed of economic growth. Public awareness of emissions has grown in recent years due to choking local air pollution from power plants, industry, and burgeoning car ownership. While it is delaying the carbon tax, a carbon trading system for seven cities is moving forward. The cap-and-trade program would regular up to a billion tons of emissions by 2015, according to Bloomberg. Related articlesThis article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2013/03/china-delays-carbon-tax/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/03/china-delays-carbon-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-29434</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>China to tax carbon emissions</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/02/china-to-tax-carbon-emissions/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/02/china-to-tax-carbon-emissions/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>20 Feb 2013 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Mongabay.com]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Rhett Butler]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2013/02/china-to-tax-carbon-emissions/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[China]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Emissions, Carbon Tax, Environment, Green, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Mitigation]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Comparison of carbon emissions from six leading countries. Click image to enlarge. China will introduce a carbon tax, reports official state media. The government will levy a tax on carbon dioxide emissions according to a statement on the Ministry of Finance&#8217;s web site. The tax will be collected by local the local taxation authority. The [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Comparison of carbon emissions from six leading countries. Click image to enlarge. China will introduce a carbon tax, reports official state media. The government will levy a tax on carbon dioxide emissions according to a statement on the Ministry of Finance&#8217;s web site. The tax will be collected by local the local taxation authority. The Ministry of Finance did not lay out a timeline for the tax but in 2010 suggested a 10 yuan per metric ton of carbon dioxide in 2012, rising to 50 yuan per ton by 2020. China is currently the world&#8217;s largest CO2 emitter. It surpassed the U.S. in 2008. There are only a handful of countries and sub-national entities that presently tax carbon. Finland and Sweden were the first countries to adopt a carbon tax in the early 1990s. Since then, Great Britain, Ireland, and Canada&#8217;s British Columbia have rolled out carbon taxes. The United States does not have a carbon tax nor any cap on carbon dioxide emissions. Related articlesThis article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2013/02/china-to-tax-carbon-emissions/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2013/02/china-to-tax-carbon-emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-29546</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Norway to double carbon tax on oil industry for climate change programs</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2012/10/norway-to-double-carbon-tax-on-oil-industry-for-climate-change-programs/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2012/10/norway-to-double-carbon-tax-on-oil-industry-for-climate-change-programs/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>15 Oct 2012 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Jeremy Hance]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Jeremy Hance]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2012/10/norway-to-double-carbon-tax-on-oil-industry-for-climate-change-programs/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Asia, Brazil, Europe, Indonesia, Latin America, Norway, and South America]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Emissions, Carbon Tax, Climate Change, climate finance, Energy, Environment, Fossil Fuels, Governance, Green, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Happy-upbeat Environmental, and Oil]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Beginning next year, Norway will nearly double the carbon tax on its domestic oil industry to help set up a $1 billion climate change fund for programs in developing nations among other green projects. The Scandinavian nation is the world&#8217;s 13 largest oil producer and third biggest oil exporter, yet has been one of the [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Beginning next year, Norway will nearly double the carbon tax on its domestic oil industry to help set up a $1 billion climate change fund for programs in developing nations among other green projects. The Scandinavian nation is the world&#8217;s 13 largest oil producer and third biggest oil exporter, yet has been one of the most active champions of funding climate change projects. Norway&#8217;s carbon tax on its North Sea oil industry will rise from around $37 (210 krone) to $71 (410 krone) next year with an additional $8 (50 krone) tax on the fishing industry for every tonne of CO2 consumed. Norway has also announced it will spend around $70 million on programs to combat deforestation globally next year. It has already pledged up to $1 billion each to forest protection in Indonesia and Brazil. The country also expects to spend $110 million on carbon credits in 2013 to offset a portion of its emissions. Related articles Campaign cuts Norway&#8217;s palm oil consumption 64% (07/25/2012) A campaign run by environmental activists has helped lead to a 87 percent reduction in palm oil use by eight major food companies in Norway, reports Rainforest Foundation Norway, which led the effort. Norway: Indonesia&#8217;s forest moratorium isn&#8217;t enough to meet emissions reduction target (05/23/2012) Indonesia&#8217;s moratorium on new forest concessions will not be enough to meet its 2020 emissions reduction target says the largest backer of the country&#8217;s forest and climate action plan. As Norway funds rainforest conservation, its pension fund invests in&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2012/10/norway-to-double-carbon-tax-on-oil-industry-for-climate-change-programs/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2012/10/norway-to-double-carbon-tax-on-oil-industry-for-climate-change-programs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-30171</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Republican stalwart calls global warming &#8216;a matter of fact&#8217;, pushes for carbon tax</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2012/07/republican-stalwart-calls-global-warming-a-matter-of-fact-pushes-for-carbon-tax/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2012/07/republican-stalwart-calls-global-warming-a-matter-of-fact-pushes-for-carbon-tax/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>13 Jul 2012 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Mongabay.com]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Rhett Butler]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2012/07/republican-stalwart-calls-global-warming-a-matter-of-fact-pushes-for-carbon-tax/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[United States]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Emissions, Carbon Tax, Climate Change, Energy, Energy Efficiency, Environment, Green, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Politics]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[NASA GISS Surface Temperature Analysis for June 2012 compared with a 1951-1980 baseline. Former Secretary of State George Shultz is calling for a carbon tax to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and oil consumption, according to an interview released today by Stanford University. Shultz, who served as secretary of state under President Ronald Reagan as [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[NASA GISS Surface Temperature Analysis for June 2012 compared with a 1951-1980 baseline. Former Secretary of State George Shultz is calling for a carbon tax to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and oil consumption, according to an interview released today by Stanford University. Shultz, who served as secretary of state under President Ronald Reagan as well as a number of other roles under previous Republican administrations, is heading up the Hoover Institution&#8217;s Task Force on Energy Policy will calls for boosting energy efficiency, reducing dependence on oil exports to improve national security, and putting a price on carbon. While the last of those objectives has been an anathema to many Republicans of late, Shultz said his party could eventually support a carbon tax. &#8220;We have to have a system where all forms of energy bear their full costs,&#8221; Shultz said. &#8220;For some, their costs are the costs of producing the energy, but many other forms of energy produce side effects, like pollution, that are a cost of society. The producers don&#8217;t bear that cost, society does. There has to be a way to level the playing field and cause those forms of energy to bear their true costs. That means putting a price on carbon.&#8221; &#8220;We&#8217;ve studied a variety of ways to do that, and to me the most appealing way is a revenue-neutral carbon tax. That is, you distribute all the revenue from the carbon tax in some fashion back to taxpayers, so there is no fiscal drag on&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2012/07/republican-stalwart-calls-global-warming-a-matter-of-fact-pushes-for-carbon-tax/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2012/07/republican-stalwart-calls-global-warming-a-matter-of-fact-pushes-for-carbon-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-30606</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Australia&#8217;s carbon tax moves closer to reality</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2011/10/australias-carbon-tax-moves-closer-to-reality/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2011/10/australias-carbon-tax-moves-closer-to-reality/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>12 Oct 2011 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Jeremy Hance]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Jeremy Hance]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2011/10/australias-carbon-tax-moves-closer-to-reality/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Australia]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Emissions, Carbon Tax, Climate Change, climate finance, Environment, Governance, Green, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Happy-upbeat Environmental, and Politics]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[By a margin of just two votes (74-72), Australia&#8217;s plan to put a price on carbon passed its toughest hurdle today. It is now expected that the Australian legislator will moved forward to put the carbon tax into law. The carbon tax, pushed aggressively by Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard, was just as ferociously opposed [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[By a margin of just two votes (74-72), Australia&#8217;s plan to put a price on carbon passed its toughest hurdle today. It is now expected that the Australian legislator will moved forward to put the carbon tax into law. The carbon tax, pushed aggressively by Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard, was just as ferociously opposed by business leaders and opposition party leader, Tony Abbott. The price on carbon will charge Australia&#8217;s top 500 emitters of greenhouse gases $23 per metric ton of carbon beginning in July 2012. This is a temporary measure: in 2015 Australia plans to move toward a cap-and-trade system. Furthermore, the legislation includes funds for investment in renewable energy as well as research and development, and has tax cuts to soften any economic blow to consumers. For his part, Abbott has pledged to repeal the tax, saying, &#8216;This is a pledge in blood. This tax will go.&#8217; Australia accounts for around 1.5 percent of global carbon emission, but the nation, almost wholly dependent on coal for energy, is world&#8217;s biggest carbon polluter per capita. Currently the EU and New Zealand both have placed a price on carbon. The legislation plans to cut Australia&#8217;s carbon emissions at least 5 percent by 2020 (from 2000 levels) and 80 percent by 2050. Related articles Australia launches limited carbon tax (07/11/2011) Australia&#8217;s 500 largest polluters will pay AU$23 ($24.60) per ton of carbon dioxide emitted beginning July 2012 under a plan announced by Australian prime minister Julia Gilliard. France announces carbon&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2011/10/australias-carbon-tax-moves-closer-to-reality/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2011/10/australias-carbon-tax-moves-closer-to-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-31878</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Australia launches limited carbon tax</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2011/07/australia-launches-limited-carbon-tax/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2011/07/australia-launches-limited-carbon-tax/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>11 Jul 2011 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Mongabay.com]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Rhett Butler]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2011/07/australia-launches-limited-carbon-tax/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Australia]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Emissions, Carbon Tax, Economics, Environment, Green, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Pollution]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Australia&#8217;s 500 largest polluters will pay AU$23 ($24.60) per ton of carbon dioxide emitted beginning July 2012 under a plan announced by Australian prime minister Julia Gilliard. The carbon tax is expected to curb emissions 5 percent relative to 2000 levels by 2020, a target well below goals set by European countries. However the Australian [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Australia&#8217;s 500 largest polluters will pay AU$23 ($24.60) per ton of carbon dioxide emitted beginning July 2012 under a plan announced by Australian prime minister Julia Gilliard. The carbon tax is expected to curb emissions 5 percent relative to 2000 levels by 2020, a target well below goals set by European countries. However the Australian government has pledged to reduce emissions 80 percent by 2050. Australia has some of the highest per capita greenhouse gas emissions in the world, ranking only behind the United States among major economies. Funds generated by the tax will go toward energy efficiency and renewable energy investments as well as pollution controls. The Gilliard government says the tax will have a limited impact on the cost of living for Australians due to redistribution of the funds generated by the tax. &#8220;Almost 6 million households will get tax cuts or increases in payments that cover the entire average price impact,&#8221; said the Gilliard government in a statement. &#8220;On average, the carbon price will cost households $9.90 per week but they get $10.10 per week in assistance.&#8221; The tax is expected to bring in AU$10 billion.This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2011/07/australia-launches-limited-carbon-tax/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2011/07/australia-launches-limited-carbon-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-32284</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>France announces carbon tax</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2009/09/france-announces-carbon-tax/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2009/09/france-announces-carbon-tax/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>10 Sep 2009 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Jeremy Hance]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Jeremy Hance]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2009/09/france-announces-carbon-tax/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Europe]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Emissions, Carbon Market, Carbon Tax, Climate Change, Coal, Economics, Energy, Environment, Environmental Law, Fossil Fuels, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Mitigation, Politics, and Pollution]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[The President of France, Nicolas Sarkozy, has announced that he will implement a carbon tax to help &#8220;save the human race&#8221; from global warming. The tax of 17 Euros (about 25 dollars) per ton of carbon will be placed on the consumption of oil, gas, and coal, but not electricity. Eighty percent of France&#8217;s electricity [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[The President of France, Nicolas Sarkozy, has announced that he will implement a carbon tax to help &#8220;save the human race&#8221; from global warming. The tax of 17 Euros (about 25 dollars) per ton of carbon will be placed on the consumption of oil, gas, and coal, but not electricity. Eighty percent of France&#8217;s electricity is delivered by nuclear power. &#8220;We want to change behavior toward fossil energies,&#8221; the French leader said in a speech in the city of Culoz in eastern France. &#8220;Changing behavior to help protect our environment is the aim of the carbon tax.&#8221; Many in France are critical of the plan, including the Socialist party which opposes Sarkozy who has stated the tax will hurt the poor. The proposition is also opposed by two thirds of French people according to recent polls. However some environment organizations, like Greenpeace France, say the tax is too low and should include electricity. Heavy industries and power companies are exempt from the tax, since they are apart of the EU&#8217;s carbon trading program. Sweden has the highest carbon tax in Europe, charging 100 Euros (145 dollars) per ton of consumption, nearly six times Sarkozy&#8217;s proposal. Related articles Lomborg calls for a carbon tax (06/17/2009) Bjorn Lomborg, a Danish business school professor and author who has riled environmentalists by arguing that addressing climate change should be a lesser priority than health and nutrition initiatives, is calling for a $7 per ton tax on carbon dioxide emissions, reports the Wall Street Journal.&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2009/09/france-announces-carbon-tax/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2009/09/france-announces-carbon-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-36328</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Lomborg calls for a carbon tax</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2009/06/lomborg-calls-for-a-carbon-tax/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2009/06/lomborg-calls-for-a-carbon-tax/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>17 Jun 2009 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Mongabay.com]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Rhett Butler]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2009/06/lomborg-calls-for-a-carbon-tax/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[United States]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Market, Carbon Tax, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Politics]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Bjorn Lomborg, a Danish business school professor and author who has riled environmentalists by arguing that addressing climate change should be a lesser priority than global health and nutrition initiatives, is calling for a $7 per ton tax on carbon dioxide emissions, reports the Wall Street Journal. According to the paper, Lomborg says a carbon [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Bjorn Lomborg, a Danish business school professor and author who has riled environmentalists by arguing that addressing climate change should be a lesser priority than global health and nutrition initiatives, is calling for a $7 per ton tax on carbon dioxide emissions, reports the Wall Street Journal. According to the paper, Lomborg says a carbon tax &#8220;could address what he calls a &#8216;market failure&#8217; in the development of solar-power systems and wind turbines effective enough and cheap enough to compete with fossil fuels.&#8221; Supporters of a carbon tax say it is a more efficient approach to regulating CO2 emissions than a cap-and-trade system, which they say will be complex and full of loopholes. Supporters of cap-and-trade argue the system offers greater flexibility (including more opportunities for carbon trading) while setting a fixed limit on emissions. They maintain that cap-and-trade is politically more feasible than a carbon tax, which enjoys little support in Washington.This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2009/06/lomborg-calls-for-a-carbon-tax/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2009/06/lomborg-calls-for-a-carbon-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-36648</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Excluding forest carbon from climate policy will spur massive deforestation</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2009/05/excluding-forest-carbon-from-climate-policy-will-spur-massive-deforestation/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2009/05/excluding-forest-carbon-from-climate-policy-will-spur-massive-deforestation/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>28 May 2009 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Mongabay.com]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Rhett Butler]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2009/05/excluding-forest-carbon-from-climate-policy-will-spur-massive-deforestation/</guid>

					
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, carbon, Carbon Emissions, Carbon Offsets, Carbon Sequestration, Carbon Tax, climate finance, Conservation, Deforestation, Energy, Environment, Forest Carbon, Forestry, Forests, Green, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Rainforests, and Redd]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Failure to develop policies that account for emissions from land use change will lead to widespread deforestation and higher costs for addressing climate change, warn researchers writing in the journal Science. Using a computer model that incorporates economics, energy, agriculture, land-use changes, emissions and concentrations of greenhouse gases, a team of researchers from the Department [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Failure to develop policies that account for emissions from land use change will lead to widespread deforestation and higher costs for addressing climate change, warn researchers writing in the journal Science. Using a computer model that incorporates economics, energy, agriculture, land-use changes, emissions and concentrations of greenhouse gases, a team of researchers from the Department of Energy&#8217;s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and the University of Maryland found that efforts to limit atmospheric carbon dioxide levels while ignoring emissions from terrestrial sources would lead to nearly a complete loss of unmanaged forests by 2100, resulting largely from increased expansion of bioenergy crops. Meanwhile placing a value (&#8220;tax&#8221;) on terrestrial carbon emissions equivalent to that on industrial and fossil fuel emissions would lead to an increase in forest cover. &#8220;When society tries to limit carbon dioxide concentrations, if terrestrial carbon emissions aren&#8217;t valued but fossil fuel and industrial emissions are, economic forces could create very strong pressures to deforest,&#8221; said study leader Marshall Wise of PNNL. Deforestation for palm oil production in Indonesia The results lend support to the current push to include terrestrial carbon sources &#8212; forests, peatlands, and other carbon-rich ecosystems &#8212; in a future climate framework. The initiative, known as REDD for &#8220;Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation&#8221;, is currently under debate ahead of December&#8217;s United Nations climate meeting (UNFCCC) in Copenhagen. While many of the details still need to be ironed out, supporters of REDD say the concept could help save global forests while protecting biodiversity, offering&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2009/05/excluding-forest-carbon-from-climate-policy-will-spur-massive-deforestation/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2009/05/excluding-forest-carbon-from-climate-policy-will-spur-massive-deforestation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-36714</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Cap or Tax Carbon Emissions?</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2009/02/cap-or-tax-carbon-emissions/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2009/02/cap-or-tax-carbon-emissions/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>04 Feb 2009 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Jonathan Lash]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Rhett Butler]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2009/02/cap-or-tax-carbon-emissions/</guid>

					
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Tax, Environment, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Politics]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Mongabay does not normally publish statements from environmental groups on climate policy matters, but this recent post from World Resources Institute preisdent Jonathan Lash is an exception.]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Mongabay does not normally publish statements from environmental groups on climate policy matters, but this recent post from World Resources Institute preisdent Jonathan Lash is an exception.This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2009/02/cap-or-tax-carbon-emissions/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2009/02/cap-or-tax-carbon-emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-37029</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>US government: $28 carbon price would raise gas prices by 25 cents</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2008/10/us-government-28-carbon-price-would-raise-gas-prices-by-25-cents/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2008/10/us-government-28-carbon-price-would-raise-gas-prices-by-25-cents/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>08 Oct 2008 14:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Mongabay.com]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Rhett Butler]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2008/12/us-government-28-carbon-price-would-raise-gas-prices-by-25-cents/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[United States]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Tax, Energy, Energy Efficiency, Environment, Fossil Fuels, Green, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Natural Gas, Oil, Pollution, and Transportation]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[US government: $28 carbon price would raise gas prices by 25 cents US government: $28 carbon price would raise gas prices by 25 cents mongabay.com October 9, 2008 Congressional Budget Office study finds $200/ton carbon tax would only raise gas prices $2 per gallon]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[US government: $28 carbon price would raise gas prices by 25 cents US government: $28 carbon price would raise gas prices by 25 cents mongabay.com October 9, 2008 Congressional Budget Office study finds $200/ton carbon tax would only raise gas prices $2 per gallonThis article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2008/10/us-government-28-carbon-price-would-raise-gas-prices-by-25-cents/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2008/10/us-government-28-carbon-price-would-raise-gas-prices-by-25-cents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-37836</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Carbon tax will ease transition to sensible climate policy</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2008/08/carbon-tax-will-ease-transition-to-sensible-climate-policy/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2008/08/carbon-tax-will-ease-transition-to-sensible-climate-policy/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>13 Aug 2008 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Richard B. Rood]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Rhett Butler]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2008/12/carbon-tax-will-ease-transition-to-sensible-climate-policy/</guid>

					
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Credits, Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Market, Carbon Tax, Economics, Environment, Environmental Policy, Green, Politics, Pollution, Redd, and Sustainability]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Carbon tax will ease transition to sensible climate policy Don&#8217;t &#8220;Sell Short&#8221; the Earth: Carbon tax will ease transition to sensible climate policy Richard B. Rood and Gabriel Thoumi August 13, 2008 The management of carbon dioxide and the climate represent both an economic development challenge and the ecological problem of the next hundred years. [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Carbon tax will ease transition to sensible climate policy Don&#8217;t &#8220;Sell Short&#8221; the Earth: Carbon tax will ease transition to sensible climate policy Richard B. Rood and Gabriel Thoumi August 13, 2008 The management of carbon dioxide and the climate represent both an economic development challenge and the ecological problem of the next hundred years. Energy use, economic success and carbon dioxide emissions are, currently, intertwined. A carbon market that represents the true cost of energy and the disposal of our waste products in the environment is a potential long-term policy mechanism for carbon dioxide management. However, the strong interconnection between carbon dioxide emissions and economic success distinguishes the carbon market from other environmental markets used to control pollution. Therefore evolution to that solution is not straightforward; there are a series of necessary steps needed to develop a market. A number of &#8220;carbon markets&#8221; have been started, for example the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS), and a number of new markets are proposed, for example the Western Climate Initiative in the United States. Point Carbon provides news and analysis of carbon markets. For these markets to achieve their ultimate goals of valuation of carbon dioxide emissions and reduction of carbon dioxide emissions, significant evolution and expansion of the markets must be realized. This article explores some of the hurdles that are necessary to cross in order to realize a successful CO2 market. The analysis converges to a set of conclusions. A stable evolution of policy to support the&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2008/08/carbon-tax-will-ease-transition-to-sensible-climate-policy/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2008/08/carbon-tax-will-ease-transition-to-sensible-climate-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-38049</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Despite loss in Congress, global warming lobby gains momentum say environmentalists</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2008/06/despite-loss-in-congress-global-warming-lobby-gains-momentum-say-environmentalists/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2008/06/despite-loss-in-congress-global-warming-lobby-gains-momentum-say-environmentalists/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>08 Jun 2008 14:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Mongabay.com]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Rhett Butler]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2008/12/despite-loss-in-congress-global-warming-lobby-gains-momentum-say-environmentalists/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[United States]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Activism, Carbon Emissions, Carbon Tax, Climate Change, Environment, Green, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Politics, and Pollution]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Despite loss in Congress, global warming lobby gains momentum say environmentalists Despite loss in Congress, global warming lobby gains momentum mongabay.com June 8, 2008 Friday&#8217;s defeat of the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (S. 3036) by the Senate is being painted by environmentalists as a step towards future legislative success. The cloture vote on the Lieberman-Warner [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Despite loss in Congress, global warming lobby gains momentum say environmentalists Despite loss in Congress, global warming lobby gains momentum mongabay.com June 8, 2008 Friday&#8217;s defeat of the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (S. 3036) by the Senate is being painted by environmentalists as a step towards future legislative success. The cloture vote on the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act officially fell 12 votes shy of the 60 needed to move the amendment process for the bill forward. Senators Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) &#8212; supporters of the legislation &#8212; said they are counting this as a 54-36 vote because six senators &#8212; Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.), Barack Obama (D-Ill.), John McCain (R-Ariz.), Norm Coleman (R-Minn.), Joe Biden (D-Del.), and Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) &#8212; said they would have voted for cloture had they been present. The 2007 rise in global carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations is tied with 2005 as the third highest since atmospheric measurements began in 1958. The red line shows the trend together with seasonal variations. The black line indicates the trend that emerges when the seasonal cycle has been removed. (Credit: NOAA) Environmentalists said despite the loss, the 54 votes cloture &#8220;demonstrates commitment to action on global warming.&#8221; &#8220;Today, a majority of the Senate sent a message to Americans and the rest of the world that they believe the time is now to confront climate change,&#8221; said World Resources Institute President Jonathan Lash. &#8220;Including statements of support from senators unable to cast their votes, 54 senators went on&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2008/06/despite-loss-in-congress-global-warming-lobby-gains-momentum-say-environmentalists/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2008/06/despite-loss-in-congress-global-warming-lobby-gains-momentum-say-environmentalists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-38203</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>Bloomberg calls for a carbon tax</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2007/12/bloomberg-calls-for-a-carbon-tax/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2007/12/bloomberg-calls-for-a-carbon-tax/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>13 Dec 2007 14:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Mongabay.com]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Rhett Butler]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2008/12/bloomberg-calls-for-a-carbon-tax/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[United States]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Market, Carbon Tax, Economics, Environment, Fossil Fuels, Green, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Bloomberg calls for a carbon tax Bloomberg calls for a carbon tax mongabay.com December 13, 2007 New York City mayor and potential U.S. presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg said that carbon cap-and-trade schemes are vulnerable to &#8220;special interests, corruption, inefficiencies,&#8221; and should be replaced by straight carbon taxes, reports the Associated Press. Speaking at the U.N. [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Bloomberg calls for a carbon tax Bloomberg calls for a carbon tax mongabay.com December 13, 2007 New York City mayor and potential U.S. presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg said that carbon cap-and-trade schemes are vulnerable to &#8220;special interests, corruption, inefficiencies,&#8221; and should be replaced by straight carbon taxes, reports the Associated Press. Speaking at the U.N. climate meeting in Bali, Indonesia Bloomberg said, &#8220;Most experts would agree that the way to solve the problem is with a carbon tax.&#8221; Bloomberg added that carbon trading is &#8220;a very inefficient way to accomplish the same thing that a carbon tax accomplishes. It leaves itself open to special interests, corruption, inefficiencies.&#8221; &#8220;You really want to tax the coal producers in a way that coal producers could reduce that tax by investing in technology and in ways to make coal a cleaner-burning, less polluting fuel,&#8221; he continued. As mayor of New York, Bloomberg has aggressively pushed energy efficiency and other &#8220;green&#8221; initiatives. Many economists say a carbon tax would be the most efficient way to curtail greenhouse gas emissions by industry.This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2007/12/bloomberg-calls-for-a-carbon-tax/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2007/12/bloomberg-calls-for-a-carbon-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-38749</doi>				</item>
						<item>
					<title>$400/ton carbon tax needed to curb aviation emissions</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2007/09/400ton-carbon-tax-needed-to-curb-aviation-emissions/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2007/09/400ton-carbon-tax-needed-to-curb-aviation-emissions/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>04 Sep 2007 14:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Mongabay.com]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Rhett Butler]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.mongabaydev.co.uk/2008/12/400ton-carbon-tax-needed-to-curb-aviation-emissions/</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Europe]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Tax, Environment, Green, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Mitigation]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[$400/ton carbon tax needed to curb aviation emissions $400/ton carbon tax needed to curb aviation emissions mongabay.com September 4, 2007 European Union proposals to reduce the climate impact of aviation will fail unless there is a substantial rise in carbon prices, concludes analysis by the Tyndall Centre, a UK-based climate research body. Friends of the [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[$400/ton carbon tax needed to curb aviation emissions $400/ton carbon tax needed to curb aviation emissions mongabay.com September 4, 2007 European Union proposals to reduce the climate impact of aviation will fail unless there is a substantial rise in carbon prices, concludes analysis by the Tyndall Centre, a UK-based climate research body. Friends of the Earth (FoE), an environmental lobby group, funded the study. The EU plans to add aviation to its Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) starting in 2011 for intra-EU flights and 2012 for all flights departing from or arriving in the EU. &#8220;We delude ourselves if we believe the proposed framing of the EU ETS is in keeping with the EU&#8217;s own and repeated commitment to limit climate change to a two degrees Celsius rise,&#8221; said Dr. Kevin Anderson, Director of the Tyndall Centre&#8217;s Energy Programme. &#8220;The current aviation ETS proposal must be significantly strengthened so as to both drive down emission growth rates and force the adoption of more efficient aircraft technologies and operation.&#8221; The study says the ETS plan begins too late and that the current price of carbon ($27 per metric ton) is too low to have any impact on flying. It warns that &#8220;even a much higher carbon price of 300 ($410) per tonne would only result in a moderate increase in ticket prices, and therefore only a moderate reduction in demand and emissions growth.&#8221; FoE says that the EU needs to strengthen the ETS proposal considerably to have an effect. The group recommends&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2007/09/400ton-carbon-tax-needed-to-curb-aviation-emissions/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2007/09/400ton-carbon-tax-needed-to-curb-aviation-emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
										<doi>https://doi.org/10.66709/news-38920</doi>				</item>
			</channel>
</rss>