|
|
Improving energy efficiency will require overcoming market distortions mongabay.com May 20, 2007
McKinsey says that global energy markets are "rife with market inefficiencies and distortions that explain why consumers and companies fail to capture savings from higher energy productivity." Chief among these is that consumers lack information they need to make smarter energy use decisions. Further, government policies, such as fuel subsidies and lack of metering, weaken price signals and incentives that would otherwise drive users to choose more energy efficient options. The study makes a number of recommendations, including ending fuel subsidies; tightening fuel-economy standards; reducing standby power consumption of applications; adopting compact fluorescent lighting in place of incandescent lighting; implementing green building codes like better insulation and HVAC (heating, ventilating, and air conditioning) systems; itemizing utility bills for consumers; and using realistic internal rate of return (IRR) hurdle rates for energy-saving investments to encourage financing of energy-conservation projects. All these recommendations have been previously advanced by Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute, an energy policy think tank.
Related articles 16 cities to get energy-saving retrofits (5/17/2007) Sixteen cities will get financing to make buildings "greener" through environmental renovations, former President Clinton announced Wednesday at the C40 Large Cities Climate Summit in New York, where mayors and local government officials are meeting to discuss strategies to flight global warming. The green building initiatives will cut carbon emissions and reduce waste. Cost of stabilizing climate 0.1% per year (5/4/2007) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released its long awaiting installment on climate change mitigation, arguing that the costs of offsetting global warming will be much lower than some claim. The IPCC estimates that emissions can be reduced rapidly using existing technology at a cost of 3 percent of GDP, or 0.12 percent per year over the next 25 years, though new technologies could further reduce this cost. While the projections are encouraging, they may be conservative. Some analysts, including the well-respected Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute, have calculated that emissions targets that would stabilize the climate could be achieved at no net cost and possibly even a profit. Even McKinsey & Company, a leading management consulting firm, agrees, putting the net cost of reducing emissions by 46 percent at zero. To fight warming, Canada will ban incandescent light bulbs by 2012 (4/25/2007) In an effort to fight greenhouse gas emissions, Canada plans to ban use of incandescent light bulbs by 2012, said Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn. Canada follows Australia as the second country to announce a ban on the inefficient bulbs. California legislators have proposed a similar ban for 2012. U.S. can cut oil imports to zero by 2040, use to zero by 2050 (3/29/2007) The United States could dramatically cut oil usage over the next 20-30 years at low to no net cost, said Amory B. Lovins, cofounder and CEO of the Colorado-based Rocky Mountain Institute, speaking at Stanford University Wednesday night for a week-long evening series of lectures sponsored by Mineral Acquisition Partners, Inc. Efficiency improvements could cut global energy demand significantly (11/29/2006) Growth in global energy consumption could be reduced by more than two-thirds over the next 15 years through energy efficiency efforts according to a study released Wednesday by the McKinsey Global Institute. Comments? News options Liquid error: Template not found languages/english/includes/x/_1.liquid SHARE THIS ARTICLE:
News index | RSS | News Feed | Twitter | Home Advertisements: Organic Apparel from Patagonia | Insect-repelling clothing
|
|
|
MONGABAY.COM
WEEKLY NEWSLETTER INTERACT
T-SHIRTS 
CALENDARS 
CANVAS BAGS 
| |
|
Copyright mongabay 2009 |
