References for “Does community-based forest management work in the tropics?”


1. Andersson, K. & Gibson, C.C., 2006. Decentralized Governance and Environmental Change: Local Institutional Moderation of Deforestation in Bolivia. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(1), pp.99–123.

2. Baland, J.M. et al., 2010. Forests to the people: Decentralization and forest degradation in the Indian Himalayas. World Development, 38(11), pp.1642–1656.

3. Beauchamp, E. & Ingram, V., 2011. Impacts of community forests on livelihoods in Cameroon: lessons from two case studies. International Forestry Review, 13(4), pp.389–403.

4. Blackman, A. et al., 2017. Titling indigenous communities protects forests in the Peruvian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(16), pp.4123–4128.

5. Blomley, T. et al., 2008. Seeing the wood for the trees: an assessment of the impact of participatory forest management on forest condition in Tanzania. Oryx, 42(3), pp.380–391.

6. Bowler, D.E. et al., 2012. Does community forest Management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(1), pp.29–36.

7. Coleman, E.A. & Fleischman, F.D., 2012. Comparing forest decentralization and local institutional change in Bolivia, Kenya, Mexico, and Uganda. World Development, 40(4), pp.836–849.

8. Cranford, M. & Mourato, S., 2011. Community conservation and a two-stage approach to payments for ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 71(1), pp.89–98.

9. Dalle, S.P. et al., 2006. Integrating analyses of local land-use regulations, cultural perceptions and land-use/land cover data for assessing the success of community-based conservation. Forest Ecology and Management, 222, pp.370–383.

10. Fortmann, L., Sohngen, B. & Southgate, D., 2017. Assessing the Role of Group Heterogeneity in Community Forest Concessions in Guatemala’s Maya Biosphere Reserve. Land Economics, 93(3), pp.503–526.

11. Gross-Camp, N., 2017. Tanzania’s community forests: Their impact on human well-being and persistence in spite of the lack of benefit. Ecology and Society, 22(1).

12. Heltberg, R., 2001. Determinants and impact of local institutions for common resource management. Environment and Development Economics, 6, pp.183–208.

13. Humphries, S. et al., 2012. Are community-based forest enterprises in the tropics financially viable? Case studies from the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Economics, 77, pp.62–73.

14. Jumbe, C.B.L. & Angelsen, A., 2006. Do the poor benefit from devolution policies? Evidence from Malawi’s forest co-management program. Land Economics, 82(4), pp.562–581.

15. Kassa, H. et al., 2009. Building future scenarios and uncovering persisting challenges of participatory forest management in Chilimo Forest, Central Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2), pp.1004–1013.

16. Klooster, D. & Masera, O., 2000. Community forest management in Mexico: carbon mitigation and biodiversity conservation through rural development. Global Environmental Change, 10, pp.259–272.

17. Kumar, S., 2002. Does “participation” in common pool resource management help the poor? A social cost-benefit analysis of joint forest management in Jharkhand, India. World Development, 30(5), pp.763–782.

18. Mazunda, J. & Shively, G., 2015. Measuring the forest and income impacts of forest user group participation under Malawi’s Forest Co-management Program. Ecological Economics, 119, pp.262–273.

19. Menton, M.C.S. et al., 2009. Company-community logging contracts in Amazonian settlements: Impacts on livelihoods and NTFP harvests. Ecology and Society, 14(1).

20. Ogada, M.J., 2012. Forest Management Decentralization in Kenya: Effects on Household Farm Forestry Decisions in Kakamega. International Association of Agricultural Economists Triennial Conference, pp.18–24.

21. Oyono, P.R., 2005. Profiling Local-Level Outcomes of Environmental Decentralizations: The Case of Cameroon’s Forests in the Congo Basin. The Journal of Environment & Development, 14, p.317.

22. Palmer, C. & Engel, S., 2007. For Better or for Worse? Local Impacts of the Decentralization of Indonesia’s Forest Sector. World Development, 35(12), pp.2131–2149.

23. Pelletier, J., Gélinas, N. & Skutsch, M., 2016. The place of community forest management in the REDD+ landscape. Forests, 7(8), pp.1–24.

24. Piketty, M.G. et al., 2015. Annual cash income from community forest management in the Brazilian Amazon: Challenges for the future. Forests, 6(11), pp.4228–4244.

25. Rasolofoson, R.A. et al., 2015. Effectiveness of Community Forest Management at reducing deforestation in Madagascar. Biological Conservation, 184, pp.271–277.

26. Rasolofoson, R.A. et al., 2016. Impacts of Community Forest Management on Human Economic Well-Being across Madagascar. Conservation Letters, 2(June), pp.1–8.

27. Santika, T. et al., 2017. Community forest management in Indonesia: Avoided deforestation in the context of anthropogenic and climate complexities. Global Environmental Change, 46(August), pp.60–71.

28. Schreckenberg, K. & Luttrell, C., 2009. Participatory forest management: a route to poverty reduction? International Forestry Review, 11(2), pp.221–238.

29. Sist, P. et al., 2014. The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers’ annual incomes in the Eastern Amazon. Forests, 5(7), pp.1508–1531.

30. Somanathan, E., Prabhakar, R. & Mehta, B.S., 2009. Decentralization for cost-effective conservation. PNAS, 106(11), pp.4143–4147.