Technologies like camera traps and drones have made monitoring wildlife in forests easier than ever. However, a new study has found that in a protected area in northern India, these devices also end up watching and harassing women who use those forest spaces.
“These findings have caused quite a stir amongst the conservation community,” Chris Sandbrook, study co-author and conservation social scientist at the University of Cambridge, U.K., said in a statement.
For the study, researcher Trishant Simlai from Cambridge interviewed women living in villages around Corbett Tiger Reserve (CTR) in northern India to understand how they use forest areas, and how technologies like camera traps and drones affect them.
The women are permitted to venture into some fringe forest areas to gather nontimber forest products like firewood and grass. But the forest isn’t just a source of livelihood for them, Simlai found. It also acts as a refuge away from patriarchal surveillance, domestic abuse and societal norms. Moreover, it’s a space for privacy, allowing comradery with other women.
However, the study found that forest department authorities sometimes deliberately fly drones over women to harass and scare them from collecting forest products, despite their having the right to do so.
Similarly, camera traps, installed by male rangers in the core of the park, and in the buffer areas that the women frequent, make the women feel watched and fearful.
Some women change their behavior as a result, talking or singing more softly, or taking unfamiliar routes to avoid the devices, increasing the risks of encountering wildlife. Interviewees also told Simlai about a case of sexual harassment in 2017 when male forest staff circulated camera-trap images of a woman from a marginalized community relieving herself in the forest.
“Almost every aspect of a woman’s life in the forest is affected by conservation surveillance technologies,” Simlai told Mongabay.
Camera traps have been key for estimating tiger numbers and identifying threats in the park, Rajiv Bhartari, a former forest officer at CTR, not involved in the study, previously told Mongabay. But while the technology gives authorities increased power, “it depends on the person, how they use it,” he said.
To his surprise, Simlai said he found one instance in which a woman had used camera traps to her advantage: whenever her husband got drunk and abusive, the woman would run to a nearby camera to escape and record the violence.
“Although this was a single incident and needs more work, it shows that these technologies can also be used for sousveillance rather than surveillance,” Simlai said.
The study’s findings have implications for how forest authorities and conservation NGOs use conservation surveillance technologies, the researchers say.
“It’s very common for projects to use these technologies to monitor wildlife, but this [study] highlights that we really need to be sure they’re not causing unintended harm,” Sandbrook said.
Banner illustration of women censoring themselves around a camera trap, by Adwait Pawar and Trishant Simlai.