<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" >

	<channel>
		<title>Conservation news</title>
		<atom:link href="https://news.mongabay.com/feed/?feedtype=bulletpoints&#038;post_type=post&#038;topic=avoided-deforestation" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>https://news.mongabay.com/list/avoided-deforestation/</link>
		<description>Environmental science and conservation news</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 15:27:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
				<item>
					<title>Amazon deforestation declines as Brazil reduces forest loss nationwide</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2026/06/amazon-deforestation-declines-as-brazil-reduces-forest-loss-nationwide/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2026/06/amazon-deforestation-declines-as-brazil-reduces-forest-loss-nationwide/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>12 Jun 2026 10:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Shanna Hanbury]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Bobbybascomb]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2026/06/12101054/dji_0203_0-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?post_type=short-article&#038;p=321056</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Amazon, Brazil, Cerrado, and Pantanal]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Conservation, Deforestation, Drivers Of Deforestation, Environment, Environmental Law, Governance, Indigenous Peoples, Indigenous Rights, Politics, Rainforests, Tropical Deforestation, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon biome fell by 23.5% in 2025 compared with 2024, according to a new report from MapBiomas, a Brazil-based land-use mapping project. Reductions in deforestation were recorded across the board in all of Brazil’s biomes, culminating in a 21% nationwide decrease in forest loss. In total, nearly 985,000 hectares (2.4 million acres) [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon biome fell by 23.5% in 2025 compared with 2024, according to a new report from MapBiomas, a Brazil-based land-use mapping project. Reductions in deforestation were recorded across the board in all of Brazil’s biomes, culminating in a 21% nationwide decrease in forest loss. In total, nearly 985,000 hectares (2.4 million acres) of forested land was cut down in 2025, the report found. Of this, 289,478 hectares (715,315 acres) was deforested in the Amazon. The decline in deforestation likely reflects a combination of stronger environmental enforcement, improved satellite monitoring and growing market demands for sustainable production, Nathalia Crusco, a researcher with MapBiomas, wrote to Mongabay. Only 5% of deforested land overlapped with enforcement actions or clearing authorizations in 2019, compared with 65% over the 2019-2025 period, she added, based on MapBiomas data. Deforestation also fell by nearly 17% in the Cerrado savanna, where agriculture expansion is most aggressive. More than half of the Cerrado&#8217;s native vegetation has already been cleared. And while the rate of deforestation in the Cerrado declined, the majority of forest clearing in Brazil, 55%, took place in the Cerrado savanna, the report said. Much of the reduction in deforestation was within Indigenous territories. Clear-cut deforestation on Indigenous lands in the Brazilian Amazon fell by 25% in 2025, according to a technical memo shared with Mongabay by Brazil’s Indigenous agency, Funai. Funai’s Remote Monitoring Center compiled the recent report. A total of 30,128 hectares (74,450 acres) of clear-cutting on Indigenous land was recorded last&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2026/06/amazon-deforestation-declines-as-brazil-reduces-forest-loss-nationwide/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2026/06/amazon-deforestation-declines-as-brazil-reduces-forest-loss-nationwide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>It&#8217;s time to engage Mennonite communities in reducing deforestation across Latin America (analysis)</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/06/its-time-to-engage-mennonite-communities-to-reduce-deforestation-in-latin-america-analysis/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/06/its-time-to-engage-mennonite-communities-to-reduce-deforestation-in-latin-america-analysis/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>03 Jun 2026 21:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Timothy J. Killeen]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2022/12/08174714/CH_20220608_0015-Edit-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=320555</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Amazon, Latin America, and South America]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Agriculture, Agrochemicals, Analysis, Avoided Deforestation, Commentary, Community Development, Deforestation, Development, Forests, Governance, Land Conflict, Land Grabbing, Land Rights, Rainforests, Religions, Tropical Deforestation, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Across 50 years and multiple countries, it’s clear that Mennonite colonies are systematic agents of deforestation in Latin America, yet they are seldom engaged by policymakers or NGOs seeking to reduce forest loss.<br />- In part this is due to the colonies’ closed nature but also because their habit of buying in frontier regions is effectively banned by law in Brazil — a nation which dominates the Amazon policy sphere —  but a new analysis posits that engagement with these groups is necessary and potentially fruitful.<br />- “Mennonite pioneers have transformed the South American forest frontier with remarkable, and unfortunate, efficiency. The question now is whether the legal, regulatory, and civil society frameworks of the countries where they now reside can engage them as partners in a different kind of transformation,” the author argues.<br />- This article is an analysis. The views expressed are those of the author, not necessarily of Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[In the global debate over tropical deforestation, the usual cast of villains is well established: agribusiness, global supply chains, cattle ranchers, and governments granting land concessions for political support. One actor rarely appears in this narrative yet has played a consequential role in transforming the South American lowland frontier: The Mennonite agricultural colonist. For more than five decades, Mennonite communities have functioned as systematic agents of agricultural frontier expansion in the Gran Chaco and Andean Amazon, methodically clearing forests, draining wetlands, and catalyzing waves of deforestation that extend far beyond any individual colony. Mennonite communities operate within the law. They purchase land through formal channels, build permanent communities, and transfer agronomic knowledge to surrounding populations. Their values emphasize hard work, communal solidarity, and a theological relationship to land as stewardship. None of this changes the ecological outcome: Wherever a Mennonite colony is established, forests fall. Faith, mobility and colony formation Mennonites are an Anabaptist denomination rooted in the 16-century Reformation, distinguished by pacifism, communal life, and cultural separation from mainstream society. Conservative congregations — whose ancestors moved from Russia to Canada, then to Mexico, Belize and South America — are organized around a local congregation that functions simultaneously as a religious community, governance structure, credit cooperative and social welfare system. When a colony is established, it is an orderly community with collective decision-making, shared infrastructure, and a coherent plan for the future. Forest being cut, burned, and prepared by a Mennonite colony before planting crops. Image courtesy of Mario Silvero.&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2026/06/its-time-to-engage-mennonite-communities-to-reduce-deforestation-in-latin-america-analysis/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/06/its-time-to-engage-mennonite-communities-to-reduce-deforestation-in-latin-america-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>In Brazil, a project paying farmers for forests is looking to scale up</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/06/in-brazil-a-project-paying-farmers-for-forests-is-looking-to-scale-up/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/06/in-brazil-a-project-paying-farmers-for-forests-is-looking-to-scale-up/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>01 Jun 2026 11:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Constance Malleret]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Alexandra Popescu]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2026/05/01104033/10895990-3d53-4c9b-99ef-0ed67f41bc96-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=320294</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Amazon, Brazil, Latin America, and South America]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Agriculture, Avoided Deforestation, Carbon Emissions, Conservation, Conservation Finance, Conservation Solutions, Deforestation, Farming, Happy-upbeat Environmental, Nature-based climate solutions, Payments For Ecosystem Services, and Solutions]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- The CONSERV payment for ecosystem services program pays landowners in the Amazon and the Cerrado savanna to protect forests they are legally allowed to convert into plantations or pasture.<br />- The program’s pilot phase has avoided over 30,000 hectares (around 74,130 acres) of legal deforestation in the states of Mato Grosso, Pará and Maranhão. Across Brazil, millions of hectares of forest on private land are at risk of being legally cleared.<br />- The Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM) is now looking to scale up the project and is evaluating mechanisms that could fund the payments without relying on donations.<br />- One solution could be combining the sale of carbon credits, price premiums for commodities and access to cheaper credit to provide long-term incentives for landowners to conserve these forested areas.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Landowner Carlos Roberto Simonetti gets three harvests per year from the corn, soy and cotton plantations on his 17,000-hectare (about 42,000 acres) farm called Fazenda Natureza Feliz, or Happy Nature, in the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso. Over the course of four years, he would also get what he calls a fourth harvest, this time from the forested areas of his property, located where the Cerrado savanna meets the Amazon Rainforest. That’s because Simonetti would receive regular payments for protecting native vegetation beyond what the law requires, as part of a pilot project for payment for ecosystem services (PES) run by the Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM), an NGO, in the states of Mato Grosso and Pará. The program, called CONSERV, gives landowners financial incentives to keep the forest standing even in areas which they are legally allowed to clear. The pilot project, which initially ran between 2020 and 2024 on 23 different properties, protected 20,707 hectares (about 51,170 acres) of land in the Cerrado and Amazon biomes with funding from the governments of Norway and The Netherlands. Ongoing contracts funded by Soft Commodities Forum members – agribusiness companies committed to preserving the Cerrado – are protecting a further 7,000 hectares (about 17,300 acres) in the states of Mato Grosso and Maranhão. IPAM is now seeking to scale up the program without relying on donations. The risk of legal deforestation The idea for CONSERV goes back to 2016, when an internal IPAM report calculated that around 1.5 million hectares (3.7&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2026/06/in-brazil-a-project-paying-farmers-for-forests-is-looking-to-scale-up/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/06/in-brazil-a-project-paying-farmers-for-forests-is-looking-to-scale-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>IMF lending programs linked with deforestation should be rethought (commentary)</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/05/imf-lending-programs-causing-deforestation-should-be-rethought-commentary/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/05/imf-lending-programs-causing-deforestation-should-be-rethought-commentary/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>29 May 2026 15:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Kevin P. GallagherRishikesh Ram BhandaryTimon Forster]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/07/23151222/kalbar_drone_190742-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=320324</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Global]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Community Development, Deforestation, Development, Environment, Environmental Policy, Finance, Forests, Governance, Poverty, Poverty Alleviation, Research, Trees, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- The IMF provides financial assistance to countries to balance their books but recent research by the co-authors of a new commentary shows this support comes at an environmental cost: an increase in deforestation.<br />- The co-authors reveal countries experience 9.2% higher annual tree cover loss during years in which they are under such programs, which is an unnecessary cost; and thus, the IMF should consider how to fix this issue while it’s currently reviewing the design of its lending programs, they argue.<br />- As the IMF rethinks its lending approach, these groundbreaking new findings underscore the need to deepen understanding of the impacts of forest and biodiversity loss on economic systems, the co-authors write.<br />- This article is a commentary. The views expressed are those of the authors, not necessarily of Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[The price of financial stability should not be environmental destruction. Yet when countries turn to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for help, their forests may quietly suffer. The IMF is currently reviewing the design of its lending programs, and it is time for change. Its recipe for getting economies back on track often features required reforms such as cutting government expenditure, increasing revenue collection through taxes or utility tariff increases, winding down public ownership of state-owned enterprises and encouraging the private sector to step up: austerity in other words. These policies are meant to restore stability in times of crisis, but growing evidence shows that IMF programs often fall short in helping countries break out of the cycle of economic and financial distress. Instead, they can trigger collateral damage in the form of negative health outcomes, worsened poverty and inequality and eroded social protection. Image by Forster et al., 2026 (CC BY 4.0). Our new research provides evidence that these programs also have an important and often overlooked environmental dimension, revealing that countries experience 9.2% higher annual tree cover loss during years in which they are under an IMF program. In a typical three-year IMF program, this amounts to forest loss the size of Barbados. This finding comes as no surprise as IMF programs are known to generally cut government spending, and environmental protections are often the first to go. These conditions that come in exchange for financial assistance are a major shortcoming when it comes to effects on forests,&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2026/05/imf-lending-programs-causing-deforestation-should-be-rethought-commentary/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/05/imf-lending-programs-causing-deforestation-should-be-rethought-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>For Honduran coffee growers, EUDR compliance means changing old habits</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/05/for-honduran-coffee-growers-eudr-compliance-means-changing-old-habits/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/05/for-honduran-coffee-growers-eudr-compliance-means-changing-old-habits/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>29 May 2026 12:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Sandra Weiss]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Alexandra Popescu]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[agroecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food systems]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2026/05/29120927/9-1-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=320278</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Central America, European Union, Honduras, and Latin America]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Agriculture, Avoided Deforestation, Coffee, Commodity agriculture, Deforestation, Drivers Of Deforestation, Environment, Environmental Law, EUDR, Farming, Forest Destruction, International Trade, Monitoring, Politics, Supply Chain, Technology, Transparency, and Tropical Deforestation]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- The EU Deforestation Regulation requires companies importing coffee from Honduras into the European market to track their supply chains all the way back to the small-scale farmers who grow the crop.<br />- For many farmers, the urgency of complying has led to the modernization of farming practices, providing a competitiveness boost to a supply chain historically based on informality.<br />- Digitalization could help to halt Honduras’s rural exodus and make coffee farming attractive to younger generations, but challenges remain around accessibility, managing digital tools, and data ownership.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[CONCEPCIÓN DE SOLUTECA, Honduras — In the 1970s, the Honduran government granted a piece of land in the mountains of Concepción de Soluteca to Roberto González’s parents. They duly grabbed a chainsaw and a machete to clear the forest. On the 12 hectares (30 acres) they received as part of a land reform, they planted corn, beans and bananas, the basic staple foods. It was a hard life up in the mountains, allowing the farmers and their families to just survive. There wasn’t much public infrastructure, and most children had to help with farmwork early on. This included González, who only attended elementary school for three years. When González inherited the land 20 years later, coffee cultivation was just taking off. Middlemen promised the farmers good money for the export crop, and the banks provided loans for cultivation. At first, this worked well, González, now 39, remembers. Coffee helped the farmers to generate income and improve living conditions. But it didn’t last long. They grew coffee much the same way they did other crops, without adequate soil or shade management. When harvests dwindled, they expanded their area, cutting the last standing forests and damaging water sources. Around 2012, they faced an outbreak of coffee rust, a fungal disease. It was a complete disaster: many farmers were thrown into poverty and forced to migrate. “We destroyed the foundations of our livelihoods, but it was out of ignorance; we just didn&#8217;t know better,” González tells Mongabay. Under the EUDR, coffee farmers step&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2026/05/for-honduran-coffee-growers-eudr-compliance-means-changing-old-habits/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/05/for-honduran-coffee-growers-eudr-compliance-means-changing-old-habits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Banks must step in before the Amazon Soy Moratorium collapses (commentary)</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/02/banks-must-step-in-before-the-amazon-soy-moratorium-collapses-commentary/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/02/banks-must-step-in-before-the-amazon-soy-moratorium-collapses-commentary/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>18 Feb 2026 16:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Ginger Cassady]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2026/02/12141643/Highway-BR-163-stretches-between-the-Tapajos-National-Forest-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=314432</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Amazon, Brazil, Latin America, and South America]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[agribusiness, Agriculture, Avoided Deforestation, Banking, Business, Commentary, Commodity agriculture, Conservation, Deforestation, Environment, Finance, Forest Destruction, Rainforests, Soy, Trade, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Finance is often portrayed as distant from environmental destruction, but in reality, it sits at the center: banks and investors decide which business models survive and which harms they will tolerate.<br />- Right now, a successful agreement called the Amazon Soy Moratorium, which has helped protect millions of hectares of forest by stopping major traders from buying soy grown on Amazon land deforested after 2008, is on the brink of collapse due to industry pressure — but banks can play a role in ensuring these traders stay in the pact and don’t let it unravel.<br />- “Financial institutions should make continued access to capital conditional on compliance with the moratorium’s core principles: no deforestation after 2008, full traceability, and zero tolerance for forest destruction in the Amazon biome,” a new op-ed argues.<br />- This article is a commentary. The views expressed are those of the author, not necessarily of Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[The Amazon Rainforest is approaching a dangerous threshold. Scientists warn that continued deforestation could push the world’s largest rainforest past a tipping point, transforming it into a degraded, fire-prone savanna that emits more carbon than it stores. One of the most effective barriers preventing that outcome is now being dismantled. For nearly 20 years, the Amazon Soy Moratorium has helped protect millions of hectares of forest. It stopped major traders from buying soy grown on land deforested after 2008, breaking the link between agricultural expansion and forest destruction. Earlier this month, following sustained lobbying and political pressure, Brazil’s leading soy industry association withdrew from the agreement, effectively collapsing a system that had become the backbone of responsible soy production in the Amazon. The moratorium helped drive a nearly 70% reduction in deforestation across monitored regions, even as soy production soared. It proved that strong rules and monitoring, backed by market pressure, can protect forests while supporting livelihoods and economic growth. A section of the Amazon rainforest stands next to soy fields in Belterra, Para state, Brazil, on Nov. 30, 2019. Image by AP Photo/Leo Correa. If it collapses fully, the consequences will be devastating. Researchers estimate that Amazon deforestation could rise by 30% in the coming decades, wiping out years of progress and pushing the rainforest closer to irreversible collapse. That would release billions of tons of carbon into the atmosphere and accelerate the climate and biodiversity crises already devastating communities worldwide. The unraveling of the moratorium is not happening&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2026/02/banks-must-step-in-before-the-amazon-soy-moratorium-collapses-commentary/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/02/banks-must-step-in-before-the-amazon-soy-moratorium-collapses-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Cameroon cookstove project looks to slow forest loss</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/01/cameroon-cookstove-project-looks-to-slow-forest-loss/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/01/cameroon-cookstove-project-looks-to-slow-forest-loss/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>30 Jan 2026 09:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Leocadia Bongben]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Ashoka]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2026/01/30073019/Pabamis-daughter-in-the-Kitchen-2-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=313523</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Africa, Cameroon, and West Africa]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Black Carbon, carbon, Carbon Emissions, Conservation, Deforestation, Environment, Food, Forest Loss, Fuelwood, Research, and Timber]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- The Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) hopes new cookstoves that require less wood than traditional varieties will slow forest loss in Cameroon.<br />- Mongabay visited one of the villages where CIFOR’s project is taking place to talk to people who are involved in it.<br />- Long-term success rates for similar projects in Africa have often been low.<br />- CIFOR wants to break that trend by encouraging people to adopt the new cookstoves and keep using them.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[GAROUA, Cameroon — One morning during the July monsoon in Bang, a village of 3,000 in North Cameroon, people woke up to heavy rains. The Mayo Tefi, a small river which runs through the village, swelled as the water level rose. Astha Pabami, a mother of 11 in her 50s, could not go out to fetch firewood, as crossing the river would have meant being swept away. Instead, she used some of the wood stacked behind her hut, lighting a fire to prepare a meal on her new cookstove. The cookstove looks like a traditional oven, with one opening for firewood and another for the pot. But it’s a big improvement over what she used to use: an open three-stone fireside. Pabami is one of about 250 women in Bang who were using these stoves when Mongabay visited the town. They were distributed as part of a project run by the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), with support from the European Union. The stoves are meant to burn cleaner and use less wood — saving forests and protecting people’s health in the process. “The open fireside consumes more firewood and dirties our pots, and we inhale smoke. We could use about 8-10 pieces of wood to cook a meal; presently, a maximum of four pieces of wood is enough,” Pabami tells Mongabay. Since the improved stoves need less firewood, she doesn’t have to collect as much during the dry season, and what she puts into storage behind her hut&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2026/01/cameroon-cookstove-project-looks-to-slow-forest-loss/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2026/01/cameroon-cookstove-project-looks-to-slow-forest-loss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Congo Basin nations roll out community payments for forest care</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/11/congo-basin-nations-roll-out-community-payments-for-forest-care/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/11/congo-basin-nations-roll-out-community-payments-for-forest-care/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>20 Nov 2025 21:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Anne Nzouankeu]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Bobbybascomb]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2023/04/14111706/mandrill_gabon-768x512.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?post_type=short-article&#038;p=309927</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Congo Basin]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Afforestation, Agriculture, Agroforestry, Avoided Deforestation, Climate Change, Deforestation, Ecosystem Services, Rainforests, and Tropical Deforestation]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Congo Basin countries have announced the launch of a payments for environmental services, or PES, initiative at the COP30 climate summit in Belém, Brazil, intended to encourage practices favorable to forest protection and restoration. The financial mechanism, announced Nov. 18 and supported by the Central African Forest Initiative (CAFI), transfers direct payments via a mobile [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Congo Basin countries have announced the launch of a payments for environmental services, or PES, initiative at the COP30 climate summit in Belém, Brazil, intended to encourage practices favorable to forest protection and restoration. The financial mechanism, announced Nov. 18 and supported by the Central African Forest Initiative (CAFI), transfers direct payments via a mobile app to communities and individuals, particularly farmers. The payments compensate participants for engaging in sustainable practices that protect and restore the environment. Eligibility to participate is based on verified completion of six types of activities: agroforestry, reforestation, deforestation-free agriculture, forest regeneration, sustainable forest management, and conservation. “Hundreds of farmers are already under contract and the first direct mobile payments based on performance were successfully made this month, confirming the efficiency and fairness of the system,” Kirsten Schuijt, director-general of WWF International, which is helping implement the system, said in a press release. This program builds on a decade of experience and on the success of pilot projects in the region. In the Democratic Republic of Congo and the Republic of the Congo, agroforestry, deforestation-free agriculture and natural regeneration contracts “cover nearly 3,000 hectares [7,400 acres], representing nearly 10,000 direct and indirect beneficiaries,” the press release notes. In Gabon, “15 villages have been identified to sign community conservation contracts the beginning of next year, covering a total area of nearly 50,000 hectares,” or about 123,600 acres. To build on that success, CAFI announced $100 million of additional funding, on top of the $25 million already committed&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/11/congo-basin-nations-roll-out-community-payments-for-forest-care/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/11/congo-basin-nations-roll-out-community-payments-for-forest-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>COP30 tropical forest fund may drive debt and deforestation, groups warn</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/11/cop30-tropical-forest-fund-may-drive-debt-and-deforestation-groups-warn/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/11/cop30-tropical-forest-fund-may-drive-debt-and-deforestation-groups-warn/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>07 Nov 2025 11:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Shanna Hanbury]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Shreya Dasgupta]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/11/07115923/54905724207_c73f7651d3_o-2-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?post_type=short-article&#038;p=309042</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Brazil and Global]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Conservation Finance, Deforestation, Environment, Environmental Law, Finance, Governance, Greenwashing, Indigenous Peoples, Politics, Rainforests, Tropical Deforestation, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[A new global fund meant to reward tropical countries for protecting forests could instead drive deforestation and deepen debt in the developing world, civil society groups warn. The Tropical Forests Forever Facility (TFFF), launched Nov. 6 in Belém, Brazil, ahead of the U.N. Climate Change Conference, aims to raise $125 billion and promises to pay [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[A new global fund meant to reward tropical countries for protecting forests could instead drive deforestation and deepen debt in the developing world, civil society groups warn. The Tropical Forests Forever Facility (TFFF), launched Nov. 6 in Belém, Brazil, ahead of the U.N. Climate Change Conference, aims to raise $125 billion and promises to pay countries up to $4 per hectare ($1.62 per acre) of standing forest each year. More than $5.5 billion has been pledged so far, and the plan is officially supported by more than 50 nations, including countries making up the Amazon, Congo and Borneo basins. The fund mandates that at least 20% of the payments to each country must be allocated to Indigenous and local communities. But more than 50 Indigenous and other civil society organizations from Latin America and the Caribbean argue the TFFF will make developing countries absorb the risks for the investments, while generous returns are guaranteed for investors and financial intermediaries. The TFFF seeks to raise its initial $125 billion capital from wealthy countries and institutional and private investors. It aims to invest this in a diversified portfolio, mostly consisting of high-interest bonds issued by emerging markets and developing economies. Any profits generated are distributed first to private investors, then the sponsor countries. What remains is transferred to tropical forest countries that meet the deforestation criteria. If the fund performs poorly financially, the price per hectare is reduced, even if environmental goals are met. “In other words, it is ultimately the taxpayers&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/11/cop30-tropical-forest-fund-may-drive-debt-and-deforestation-groups-warn/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/11/cop30-tropical-forest-fund-may-drive-debt-and-deforestation-groups-warn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Setting the record straight on Jurisdictional REDD+: The case of Brazil</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/09/setting-the-record-straight-on-jurisdictional-redd-the-case-of-brazil/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/09/setting-the-record-straight-on-jurisdictional-redd-the-case-of-brazil/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>21 Sep 2025 13:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Daniel NepstadLuiza MuccilloMonica de los RiosRonaldo Seroa da MottaThuanny Vieira]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Rhett Butler]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/09/05142002/07-amazon_241209040251z-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=306300</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Amazon, Brazil, Latin America, and South America]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, carbon, Carbon Credits, Conservation, Deforestation, Environment, Forest Carbon, Forests, Green, Jurisdictional Approaches, Mitigation, Rainforests, Redd, Saving Rainforests, Solutions, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Jurisdictional REDD+ (JREDD+) has been a climate finance mechanism under the UN for nearly two decades. In Brazil, JREDD+ is a public policy approach developed by Brazilian federal and state governments to promote large-scale forest conservation and climate mitigation.<br />- Emission reductions are measured at the jurisdictional level—not tied to individual properties or collective territories—and generate carbon credits based on verified drops in deforestation and degradation.<br />- Participation is voluntary and protected by safeguards and law, ensuring communities, farmers, and local actors can opt in or out while retaining land and resource rights. JREDD+ enables access to climate finance from private and public sources, with benefits distributed to rural sectors and credits issued only after independent verification.<br />- The views expressed are those of the authors, not necessarily Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Misconceptions about jurisdictional REDD+ programs have been amplified in recent press coverage, such as reports by Climate Home News and Mongabay. This analysis aims to clarify key aspects of JREDD+ to contribute to a more accurate and informed public debate. Jurisdictional REDD+ Is Not New—In Brazil or Globally Jurisdictional REDD+ (JREDD+) is not an experimental approach. It began to be formally discussed under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 2005, with the first decisions on the mechanism adopted in 2007 during COP 13 in Bali. Through the Bali Action Plan, the Parties to the Convention recognized the need to support developing countries in reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation—REDD is the acronym for this phrase—as well as the role of conservation, sustainable forest management, and the enhancement of forest carbon stocks—the ‘plus’ in REDD+. Amazon rainforest. Photo by Rhett Ayers Butler Brazil was the first country in the world to create a JREDD+ program, establishing the Amazon Fund in 2008—as the first results-based REDD+ financial mechanism, designed both to receive payments and to channel resources through benefit-sharing, supporting forest conservation and sustainable development. The country then established its National REDD+ Strategy and the National REDD+ Commission in 2015. At the subnational level, Acre and Mato Grosso states created legal frameworks for REDD+ in 2010 and 2013, respectively. Both have received REDD+ payments under the REDD+ for Early Movers (REM) Program supported by Germany and the UK. These experiences are part of Brazil’s long-standing commitment to climate&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2025/09/setting-the-record-straight-on-jurisdictional-redd-the-case-of-brazil/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/09/setting-the-record-straight-on-jurisdictional-redd-the-case-of-brazil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>The formula that reduced deforestation in Brazil in the 21st century</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/09/the-formula-that-reduced-deforestation-in-brazil-in-the-21st-century/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/09/the-formula-that-reduced-deforestation-in-brazil-in-the-21st-century/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>19 Sep 2025 09:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Timothy J. Killeen]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Mayra]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2023/09/13124248/Cattle-ranching-in-Amazon-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=306234</guid>

											<reporting-project>
							<![CDATA[Perfect Storm in the Amazon]]>
						</reporting-project>
					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Amazon, Brazil, Latin America, and South America]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Agriculture, Avoided Deforestation, Biodiversity, Conservation, Deforestation, Deforestation Alert System, Environment, Environmental Law, Forest Destruction, Forest Loss, Governance, Indigenous Peoples, Land Rights, Politics, Protected Areas, Rainforests, Threats To Rainforests, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- In 2009, the Brazilian government made a commitment to the United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to decrease deforestation by 80% by 2020, but exceeded that target in 2012, when the annual deforestation rate was only 20% of its twenty-year historical mean.<br />- The Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Legal Amazon (PPCDAm) is considered one of Lula da Silva&#8217;s major wins during his first two terms as president. Although the initiative did not eliminate deforestation, its policies succeeded in changing human behavior and business models on the forest frontier.<br />- In 2019, president Jair Bolsonaro defunded the programme’s law-and-order components and dissolved the PPCDAm, while running limited activities to combat deforestation.<br />- Once Lula de Silva got re-elected in 2023, he revived the program, which now focuses less on command-and-control measures like deforestation fines and land-use planning, and more on promoting sustainable livelihoods. <br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[The dramatic reduction in deforestation in Brazil between 2004 and 2012 was the result of an ‘all of government approach’, which was closely coordinated with private initiatives responding to international boycotts that targeted commodity supply chains. Launched in the first year of President Inácio Lula da Silva’s first term, the Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Legal Amazon (PPCDAm) was successful largely because it was executed from the Casa Civil, a high-level entity within the office of the Presidency (CC/PR). The early success of the PPCDAm demonstrated that reducing deforestation requires policies that span the regulatory apparatus at the federal, state and local level. Although the initiative did not eliminate deforestation, its policies succeeded in changing human behaviour and business models on the forest frontier. In 2009, the government made a commitment to the United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) to decrease deforestation by 80% by 2020, but exceeded that target in 2012, when the annual deforestation rate was only 20% of its twenty-year historical mean. Despite its initial success, the PPCDAm failed to eradicate certain types of small-scale land clearing and was ineffective in combating the wildcat gold mining that exploded across the region. The shortfall was not necessarily a design failure, however, but the result of the political calculus of subsequent administrations and a global market that continued to drive the expansion of agribusiness. A social backlash fueled by vested interests with raw political power and dissatisfaction fueled by the Lava&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2025/09/the-formula-that-reduced-deforestation-in-brazil-in-the-21st-century/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/09/the-formula-that-reduced-deforestation-in-brazil-in-the-21st-century/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>The carbon market paradox: Steve Zwick on why financing forests is more complicated than it looks</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/09/the-carbon-market-paradox-steve-zwick-on-why-financing-forests-is-harder-than-it-looks/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/09/the-carbon-market-paradox-steve-zwick-on-why-financing-forests-is-harder-than-it-looks/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>15 Sep 2025 03:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Rhett Ayers Butler]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Rhett Butler]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/09/13205522/vietnam_162000z-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=305870</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Global]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Biodiversity credits, Books, carbon, Carbon Market, Carbon Offsets, climate finance, Conservation, Conservation Finance, Deforestation, Environment, Finance, Forest Carbon, Forests, Green, Interviews, Payments For Ecosystem Services, Rainforests, Redd, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Steve Zwick’s career has traced the intersection of climate, finance, and media, from Chicago trading pits to international business reporting, Deutsche Welle, Ecosystem Marketplace, and now his Bionic Planet podcast and Carbon Paradox, where he focuses on clarifying the complexities of carbon markets and REDD+.<br />- He emphasizes that carbon markets are built on probabilities, not certainties, and criticizes both media and advocacy for flattening nuance into oversimplified verdicts. For him, methods evolve through revision, guardrails, and conservative accounting, with avoidance of deforestation often delivering the greatest climate impact.<br />- Zwick frames forest carbon as payment for services protecting a global commons, not charity, and insists that best practice must be community-led. He warns that skewed scrutiny and polarized narratives risk sidelining a tool that, while imperfect, can mobilize resources quickly until deeper emissions cuts take hold.<br />- Zwick was interview by Mongabay Founder and CEO Rhett Ayers Butler in September 2025.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Carbon markets sit at the awkward junction of science, finance, and politics, where the appetite for simple stories collides with a system built on probabilities. Few reporters have spent more time in that junction than Steve Zwick. He came to climate through the trading pits of Chicago, where he watched how information asymmetries reward insiders and mislead the public. That early lesson became a through line in his journalism and in his current work dissecting forest carbon and REDD+, the mechanism meant to make standing forests more valuable than felled ones. “The great tragedy of climate finance,” he has said, “is that those who understand it most have their noses to the grindstone, while those who understand it least have their mouths to the megaphone.” Zwick’s route was circuitous but coherent. He covered European business for TIME and Fortune, produced and hosted Deutsche Welle’s “Money Talks,” and later helped build Ecosystem Marketplace into a reference point for environmental finance. He has advised NGOs, companies, and governments, and worked at Verra—an organization that develops and manages carbon credit standards—on special projects. Since 2016, he has hosted the Bionic Planet podcast to chip away at the very asymmetries that first bothered him on the trading floor. In 2025, he co-founded Carbon Paradox and co-authored The Carbon Paradox with Renat Heuberger and Marco Hirsbrunner. Both efforts argue that carbon credits can finance meaningful mitigation, especially in the Global South, but only if their tradeoffs are faced openly rather than spun away. If that&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2025/09/the-carbon-market-paradox-steve-zwick-on-why-financing-forests-is-harder-than-it-looks/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/09/the-carbon-market-paradox-steve-zwick-on-why-financing-forests-is-harder-than-it-looks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Carbon offset markets are unfair to communities in Borneo &#038; beyond (commentary)</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/08/carbon-offset-markets-are-unfair-to-indigenous-communities-in-borneo-beyond-commentary/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/08/carbon-offset-markets-are-unfair-to-indigenous-communities-in-borneo-beyond-commentary/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>29 Aug 2025 19:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Fiona McAlpine]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/08/29185237/IMG_5011_173-768x512.jpeg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=305206</guid>

					
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Business, carbon, Carbon Market, Carbon Offsets, Climate, Climate Change, climate finance, Commentary, Forest Carbon, Forests, Indigenous Peoples, Indigenous Rights, Land Rights, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Recent investigations have found that many carbon offset projects overstate their impact, ignore Indigenous rights, and fail to deliver on promised benefits.<br />- In tropical forest regions like Malaysian Borneo, only 1% of climate finance reaches Indigenous communities, despite the latter’s proven role in preventing deforestation: in many cases these communities’ stewardship is what makes carbon offset programs possible.<br />- “The communities who have fought tooth and nail to keep these forests standing are not being rewarded with handsome sums for their efforts. The carbon credits (and the cash) flow primarily to the license holders, not to the Indigenous people who protect these lands,” a new op-ed states.<br />- This post is a commentary. The views expressed are those of the author, not necessarily of Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[I write this while waiting for my tablet to die. Tomorrow, I’ll return to air-conditioning, stable WiFi and refrigeration, but here in Long Moh, deep in the remote Upper Baram region of Sarawak, there has been no electricity for two weeks. The fans sit useless and mocking in the corners, and a sudden downpour is the only relief that cuts through the muggy heat. Communities here are among the least responsible for climate change, yet they’re already living with its sharpest edges. Each year in Malaysia, we now hear stories of children suffering permanent brain damage or death during heat waves because they simply played in the sun. In a place without air-conditioning, 1° Celsius (1.8° Fahrenheit) of global warming is not a statistic — it is a threat to life. And now, through carbon offsetting projects, these same communities are being asked to save the world from a crisis they did not create — often with little say, and even less reward. I have traveled here with local NGOs SAVE Rivers and Sahabat Alam Malaysia, which are leading community workshops on carbon credit and offset projects. Rumors abound that this region — one of Sarawak’s last remaining strongholds of intact tropical forest — has been earmarked for a carbon project courtesy of a timber company with a decades-long track record of trying to chop it all down. Species like the rhinoceros hornbill (Buceros rhinoceros) benefit from forest conservation in Baram, too. Image courtesy of Mark Louis Benedict via Flickr.&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2025/08/carbon-offset-markets-are-unfair-to-indigenous-communities-in-borneo-beyond-commentary/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/08/carbon-offset-markets-are-unfair-to-indigenous-communities-in-borneo-beyond-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Brazilian court restores Amazon soy moratorium, for now</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/08/brazilian-court-restores-amazon-soy-moratorium-for-now/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/08/brazilian-court-restores-amazon-soy-moratorium-for-now/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>28 Aug 2025 12:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Shanna Hanbury]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Bobbybascomb]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/08/28110127/AP23031721177498-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?post_type=short-article&#038;p=305065</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Amazon and Brazil]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Conservation, Deforestation, Environment, Environmental Law, Forests, Politics, Rainforest Destruction, Rainforests, Soy, Threats To Rainforests, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[A federal court in Brazil has reinstated the Amazon soy moratorium, a private-sector antideforestation measure that helps protect the Amazon Rainforest against the expansion of soy farms in the biome. The Aug. 25 ruling overturns a suspension issued last week by Brazil’s antitrust regulator, CADE, which had opened an investigation into claims that the two-decade-old [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[A federal court in Brazil has reinstated the Amazon soy moratorium, a private-sector antideforestation measure that helps protect the Amazon Rainforest against the expansion of soy farms in the biome. The Aug. 25 ruling overturns a suspension issued last week by Brazil’s antitrust regulator, CADE, which had opened an investigation into claims that the two-decade-old soy moratorium violates competition laws. The ongoing antitrust probe is unaffected by the court’s decision, but federal judge Adverci Mendes de Abreu ruled that suspending the moratorium until the investigation is complete — which could take years — went too far. “The Soy Moratorium, in effect since 2006, is voluntary, involves multiple public and private actors, and has been recognized as an instrument to promote sustainable development,” Abreu wrote in her decision. “At this preliminary stage, it appears disproportionate and premature to immediately dismantle it through a monocratic decision, without collegial debate and without proper consideration of the technical arguments offered in the original proceeding,” the decision continues. The ruling came in response to an appeal filed by the Brazilian Association of Vegetable Oil Industries (ABIOVE), which represents multinational grain traders including Cargill, Cofco, Bunge and Louis Dreyfus, all signatories to the soy moratorium. The deal was signed in 2006 and is credited with keeping at least 18,000 square kilometers (about 7,000 square miles) of rainforest standing. At the same time, it gave Brazilian soy greater access to international markets. ABIOVE said in a statement that it “welcomed the federal court’s decision to suspend CADE’s&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/08/brazilian-court-restores-amazon-soy-moratorium-for-now/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/08/brazilian-court-restores-amazon-soy-moratorium-for-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Reversing deforestation relies on resource ownership (commentary)</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/08/reversing-deforestation-relies-on-resource-ownership-commentary/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/08/reversing-deforestation-relies-on-resource-ownership-commentary/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>05 Aug 2025 18:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Brent SohngenDouglas Southgate]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/07/23151222/kalbar_drone_190742-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=303773</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Amazon, Asia, Brazil, Cerrado, Global, Latin America, Nepal, South America, and South Asia]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Agriculture, Avoided Deforestation, climate finance, Commentary, Commodity agriculture, Conservation, Deforestation, Environment, Forests, International Trade, Land Rights, Payments For Ecosystem Services, Rainforests, Reforestation, Savannas, Soy, Trade, Tropical Deforestation, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- The transition from deforestation to reforestation will rely on local resource ownership, because this ownership is an unavoidable prerequisite for the financing of carbon sequestration and other ecosystem services provided by forests, the authors of a new op-ed argue.<br />- “From Himalayan foothills to reforested cattle ranches in Central America, individuals and communities that own tree-covered land are being paid to safeguard forest ecosystem services. But even where conservation payments are not on the table, property rights, alone, make environmental improvement more rewarding for those individuals and communities,” they write.<br />- This post is a commentary. The views expressed are those of the authors, not necessarily of Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Having receded by 350 million hectares (almost 865 million acres) since 1850, trends in Latin American forests are now inflecting away from further losses of tree-covered habitats and toward their recovery. As we explain in our book Reversing Deforestation, published by Stanford University Press in December 2024, this change stems from reduced population growth and the continuing improvement of agricultural yields. But as we also point out, the transition from deforestation to reforestation will hinge during the years to come on local resource ownership, not least because this ownership is an unavoidable prerequisite for the financing of carbon sequestration and other ecosystem services provided by forests. Mainly because it causes the demand for food to go up, demographic expansion adds to the displacement of natural habitats by farms and ranches. Forest loss in Latin America during the last 175 years, when human numbers in the region rose from 30 million to 650 million or more, is a clear example. However, human fertility has plunged in the region, from 5.9 births per woman in 1960 to 1.9 births per woman today, so annual natural increase (equal to the birth rate minus the death rate) has declined from nearly 3% to less than 1%. Human fertility has fallen more in Latin America than in sub-Saharan Africa, where women still bear more than four children, on average, and natural increase remains above 2% a year. This difference in demographic trajectories is a major reason why annual forest losses in the two regions are&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2025/08/reversing-deforestation-relies-on-resource-ownership-commentary/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/08/reversing-deforestation-relies-on-resource-ownership-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>From apps to Indigenous guardians: Ways we can save rainforests</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/07/from-apps-to-indigenous-guardians-ways-we-can-save-rainforests/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/07/from-apps-to-indigenous-guardians-ways-we-can-save-rainforests/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>08 Jul 2025 09:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Mongabay.com]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Kristine Sabillo]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/06/12211631/Mongabay_Thumbnail_RainForest_Featured_2-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?post_type=short-article&#038;p=302033</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Amazon, Global, and Peru]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Activism, Avoided Deforestation, Conservation, Deforestation, Environment, Environmental Law, Forest Carbon, Forestry, Forests, Governance, Green, Happy-upbeat Environmental, Indigenous Peoples, Indigenous Rights, Land Rights, Logging, Politics, Protected Areas, Rainforest Destruction, Rainforests, Threats To Rainforests, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Deforestation figures can be frustrating to look at, but there are a number of success stories when it comes to protecting tropical forests that we can learn from, Crystal Davis, global program director at the World Resources Institute, says in a recent Mongabay video. “We know what works. We know how to do it,” Davis [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Deforestation figures can be frustrating to look at, but there are a number of success stories when it comes to protecting tropical forests that we can learn from, Crystal Davis, global program director at the World Resources Institute, says in a recent Mongabay video. “We know what works. We know how to do it,” Davis says. “We have more tools than ever to help us combat deforestation.” One of those tools is Global Forest Watch, an online platform that uses satellite data, artificial intelligence and cloud computing to track where exactly deforestation is happening and where forests are growing back. Part of the tool is the Forest Watcher app, which allows forest rangers like those working for Madagascar’s National Parks Association to monitor deforestation. The app has led to swifter responses to drivers of deforestation, such as fires, WRI said in a 2024 post. “Data and transparency of data play an incredibly important role in protecting tropical forests,” Davis says. In Peru, the Rainforest Foundation US helped train more than 30 communities in using Forest Watcher. Data visualized on Global Forest Watch showed that in the first year alone, the territories of those 30 communities had 50% fewer deforestation alerts compared to another 30 communities that didn’t use the app. Another map shown in the Mongabay video reveals the critical role of local communities and Indigenous peoples in conservation in the Amazon, with much lower deforestation within their territories than outside. “You can see that the areas where Indigenous peoples&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/07/from-apps-to-indigenous-guardians-ways-we-can-save-rainforests/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/07/from-apps-to-indigenous-guardians-ways-we-can-save-rainforests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>It’s time to pay the true value of tropical forest conservation (commentary)</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/06/its-time-to-pay-the-true-value-of-tropical-forest-conservation-commentary/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/06/its-time-to-pay-the-true-value-of-tropical-forest-conservation-commentary/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>12 Jun 2025 22:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[André AquinoJoão Rezende]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2021/12/15141419/toucan-in-brazil-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=300723</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Amazon, Brazil, Global, Latin America, and South America]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Climate, Climate Change, climate finance, Commentary, Conservation, Conservation Finance, Conservation Solutions, Deforestation, Finance, Forests, Governance, Rainforests, Solutions, Tropical Deforestation, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Conserving the world’s tropical forests requires large-scale and predictable finance, a new op-ed by Brazilian officials argue in making their case for the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF), a finance regime that will be discussed at this year’s U.N. climate summit (COP30) in their nation.

 <br />- The TFFF would pay a fixed price per hectare of tropical forest conserved or restored, providing positive incentives aligned with national fiscal planning via a funding model that blends public investment and private market borrowing.<br />- “The time to act boldly for our forests is now. The TFFF is not only possible — it is essential. We are calling on the world to join us,” they write.<br />- This post is a commentary. The views expressed are those of the authors, not necessarily of Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Tropical forests help regulate the global climate, host irreplaceable biodiversity and provide fresh water resources. Plus forests in general are the source of livelihoods for more than a billion people — so our very existence depends on them. However, because their value is not reflected in markets, these areas are often converted to other uses. Conserving our tropical forests requires large-scale and predictable finance. A menu of financing options to conserve tropical forests and reverse ongoing deforestation could include high-integrity carbon markets, private investment in nature-based solutions, promoting sustainable products from forests, and incorporating the value of forests in funding decisions by commercial and multilateral development banks. And the timing for that is now — the road to the 2025 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30) in Belém, Brazil, provides a unique window to summon public, private and philanthropic actors to mobilize large-scale finance to pay for the true value of forests and ensure their vital existence. A proposal on the table — launched by Brazil during COP28 and supported by several tropical and potential investor countries, experts, civil society organizations, and Indigenous and local community organizations — can provide substantial resources to conserve standing forests at an unprecedented scale that’s independent of short-term political cycles. Oil palm planation on the left and intact tropical rainforest at the right, Sumatra, Indonesia. Image by Rhett Ayers Butler/Mongabay. The Tropical Forest Forever Facility Most forest conservation funding comes from national budgets to finance activities such as forest protection, fire prevention, promotion of bioeconomy projects and payments&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2025/06/its-time-to-pay-the-true-value-of-tropical-forest-conservation-commentary/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/06/its-time-to-pay-the-true-value-of-tropical-forest-conservation-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>&#8216;Mining companies will lie to your face&#8217;: Carlos Zorrilla on 30 years of fighting for Intag Valley</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/podcast/2025/06/every-day-i-have-to-think-about-mining-carlos-zorrilla-on-30-years-of-fighting-for-intag-valley/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/podcast/2025/06/every-day-i-have-to-think-about-mining-carlos-zorrilla-on-30-years-of-fighting-for-intag-valley/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>10 Jun 2025 20:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Mike DiGirolamo]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/06/03040502/Zorrlia-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=300418</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Ecuador]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Activism, Avoided Deforestation, Cloud Forests, Copper, Deforestation, Drivers Of Deforestation, Environment, Interviews, Interviews with conservation players, Mining, Rainforests, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[Carlos Zorrilla has been living in an Ecuadorian cloud forest since the 1970s, and his last 30 years there have been spent fighting mining companies seeking to extract its large copper deposits. He and his community have successfully fought proposals by multiple firms in one of the most biodiverse regions on the planet, but sometimes [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Carlos Zorrilla has been living in an Ecuadorian cloud forest since the 1970s, and his last 30 years there have been spent fighting mining companies seeking to extract its large copper deposits. He and his community have successfully fought proposals by multiple firms in one of the most biodiverse regions on the planet, but sometimes at great personal risk, he tells Mongabay&#8217;s podcast. While his organization, Defensa y Conservación Ecológica de Intag (DECOIN), and allies in the local community notched a major victory against mining there in a 2023 court case, he explains they&#8217;re still not out of the proverbial woods. &#8220;Every day, I have to think about mining [and] I&#8217;m not exaggerating, my life now revolves around mining. Even though we won a case, I know they&#8217;re going to come back because the copper&#8217;s there, and there&#8217;s a lot of demand for copper.&#8221; His advice to anyone who wants to protect their community from mining is to go on the offensive, early and aggressively, comparing the strategy to how one might view treating cancer. &#8220;You have to think of it like a cancer, that you need to treat it immediately and you need to look for signs that your body, in this case, your community, is sick,” Zorrilla says. The mining companies they’ve resisted also use misinformation and community division as tactics, he says. &#8220;The most important thing is to know that the mining companies and government will lie to your face. They&#8217;ll only supply a minimum amount of&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/podcast/2025/06/every-day-i-have-to-think-about-mining-carlos-zorrilla-on-30-years-of-fighting-for-intag-valley/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/podcast/2025/06/every-day-i-have-to-think-about-mining-carlos-zorrilla-on-30-years-of-fighting-for-intag-valley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>The Tropical Forest Forever Facility needs more local and Indigenous focus (commentary)</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/06/the-tropical-forest-forever-facility-needs-more-local-and-indigenous-focus-commentary/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/06/the-tropical-forest-forever-facility-needs-more-local-and-indigenous-focus-commentary/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>03 Jun 2025 13:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Joe Eisen]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/12/18204154/amazon_241209144749x-1-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=300115</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Global and Tropics]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Biodiversity, Commentary, Conservation Finance, Finance, Forests, Rainforests, Tropical Deforestation, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- The new Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) aims to fund forest conservation by paying nations an annual fee of $4 for every hectare of forest they maintain.<br />- The fund’s launch is expected to be a major focal point of the COP30 climate summit in November, and the TFFF secretariat is currently negotiating many of its fine details, which are expected to be released at the end of June. A new briefing prepared by 40+ environmental, human rights and Indigenous organizations lays out their concerns about the TFFF&#8217;s equity issues, and describes how they should be tackled.<br />- “About 20% of the funds are expected to be allocated to Indigenous and local communities. This is a step in the right direction, but for the TFFF’s funding to reach its intended recipients, it must go directly to them, to the largest extent possible, rather than as in the current proposal, with payments being in the hands of national governments,” a new op-ed argues.<br />- This post is a commentary. The views expressed are those of the author, not necessarily of Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[In 2024, the world lost almost 6.7 million hectares (16.5 million acres) of primary tropical forest, the fastest rate ever recorded. The world’s forests are still falling prey to mining, logging and agriculture, but as the climate crisis intensifies, for the first time on record, the leading cause of tropical primary forest loss is fire. Burning forests are further supercharging extreme weather by pumping more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Against this bleak backdrop — and with world leaders’ promise to end and reverse deforestation by 2030 well off track — a planned new $125 billion investment fund to pay tropical countries to halt deforestation offers a lifeline for the world’s forests, and the Indigenous and local communities who live in them. The Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) was proposed by Brazil at the COP28 climate summit in Dubai in 2023 and aims to keep forests standing by paying nations an initial annual fee of $4 for every hectare of forest they maintain. The money will come from a permanent endowment fund created by a combination of sovereign and philanthropic capital and private investment. Members of Malinggai Uma Tradisional Mentawai, a grassroots, Indigenous-led conservation organization, takes a break during a forest patrol, South Siberut, Indonesia. Image by Ana Norman Bermudez for Mongabay. The fund’s launch is expected to be a major focal point of the COP30 climate summit in November, hosted by Brazil in the Amazonian city of Belém. Investors, tropical forest governments and the TFFF secretariat are currently negotiating&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2025/06/the-tropical-forest-forever-facility-needs-more-local-and-indigenous-focus-commentary/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/06/the-tropical-forest-forever-facility-needs-more-local-and-indigenous-focus-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>EU anti-deforestation law could overlook big violators, NGO warns</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/05/eu-anti-deforestation-law-could-overlook-big-violators-ngo-warns/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/05/eu-anti-deforestation-law-could-overlook-big-violators-ngo-warns/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>23 May 2025 07:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Shanna Hanbury]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Bobbybascomb]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/05/23071027/deforestation-for-palm-oil-and-soy-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?post_type=short-article&#038;p=299538</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Europe and Global]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Climate Change, Conservation, Deforestation, Drivers Of Deforestation, Environment, Environmental Law, Forests, Politics, Threats To Rainforests, and Tropical Deforestation]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[The European Union’s landmark anti-deforestation law could fail to deliver on its environmental promises if enforcement authorities disproportionately focus on small importers while missing less obvious violations from major commodity firms, according to a new analysis by U.K.-based investigative nonprofit, Earthsight. The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), which comes into force Dec. 30, 2025, aims to [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[The European Union’s landmark anti-deforestation law could fail to deliver on its environmental promises if enforcement authorities disproportionately focus on small importers while missing less obvious violations from major commodity firms, according to a new analysis by U.K.-based investigative nonprofit, Earthsight. The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), which comes into force Dec. 30, 2025, aims to prevent new tropical deforestation from Europe’s supply chains for soy, beef, palm oil and other commodities. To do so, it will require geolocalized data from indirect and direct suppliers that prove their products didn’t contribute to deforestation since December 2020. The largest importers “will submit due diligence statements accurately and on time. They will have due diligence systems in place. They will have correctly identified risks. They will have traceability systems of some kind in operation,” the report’s authors write. “The problems with these importers will lie deeper. Their mitigation measures will be weak. Their traceability systems will have fundamental flaws, but these will be well hidden,” they added. In February, Cargill, one of the largest exporters of soy from Brazil’s Amazon Rainforest and Cerrado savanna, took advantage of the EUDR to weaken already existing anti-deforestation agreements. The agribusiness pushed up its deforestation cutoff date from 2008, the year established by the soy moratorium, to 2020, the cutoff date set by the EUDR. That would allow the company 14 more years of deforestation without consequence. “There is good reason to be mistrustful of such firms,” Earthsight’s analysis writes. “Unfortunately, there are reasons to fear they&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/05/eu-anti-deforestation-law-could-overlook-big-violators-ngo-warns/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/short-article/2025/05/eu-anti-deforestation-law-could-overlook-big-violators-ngo-warns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Paying to prevent deforestation is positive &#038; not &#8216;nothing&#8217; (commentary)</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/04/paying-to-prevent-deforestation-is-positive-not-nothing-commentary/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/04/paying-to-prevent-deforestation-is-positive-not-nothing-commentary/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>24 Apr 2025 23:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Jessica Ausinheiler]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/04/24212058/Amigos-del-Bosque-1-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=298160</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Central America, Latin America, and Panama]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Biodiversity, Carbon Credits, Carbon Offsets, Commentary, Conservation, Conservation Finance, Deforestation, Ecosystem Services, Environment, Forests, Payments For Ecosystem Services, Rainforests, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Should the world pay people to refrain from their destroying forests, a new commentary asks?<br />- There is something inherently uncomfortable about paying someone to do &#8216;nothing&#8217; like not cut down their rainforest, but in reality, the value of these places&#8217; ecosystem services and climate regulation is not much different from dividends shareholders earn by owning stocks.<br />- &#8220;By compensating landholders for the services their forests provide, we recognize their true value and offer a pragmatic response to deforestation, biodiversity loss, and climate change,&#8221; the author argues.<br />- This article is a commentary. The views expressed are those of the author, not necessarily Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[During my 2023-24 IIE Rodman C. Rockefeller Centennial Fellowship research in eastern Panama, I walked through my neighbor Johnson’s land (not his real name), discussing the 18 hectares (44 acres) of steeply inclined secondary forest he has left on his property. As we wandered along the forest&#8217;s edge, he turned to me and asked, “How much will you pay me not to cut this forest down?” His words stopped me in my tracks. Over the past five years of living and working in eastern Panama, I have met dozens of individuals and groups of landholders who value biodiversity and recognize the importance of preserving intact rainforest. At the same time, my overriding observation is that most of my neighbors, pressured by economic demands and following local tradition, place a higher value on land clearing for farming and cattle ranching. Cutting down trees is called “limpieza” or “cleaning up.” The use of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides is referred to as “medicina,” or medicine. Fear of the forest, with its snakes and jaguars, and a preference for open, manicured landscapes further reinforce this tendency. The prevailing perception is, ‘There is enough forest here.’ Indeed, our communities abut the Tumbes-Chocó-Magdalena bioregion, a vast chain of forests stretching from eastern Panama to Peru, that is among the most biodiverse regions in the world. On a clear day, you can see the forest of our Indigenous Guna neighbors as far as the eye can see, down to the shores of the Caribbean. Forest in the&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2025/04/paying-to-prevent-deforestation-is-positive-not-nothing-commentary/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/04/paying-to-prevent-deforestation-is-positive-not-nothing-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Agroforestry can reduce deforestation, but supportive policies matter, study finds</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/04/agroforestry-can-reduce-deforestation-but-supportive-policies-matter-study-finds/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/04/agroforestry-can-reduce-deforestation-but-supportive-policies-matter-study-finds/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>21 Apr 2025 08:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Carolyn Cowan]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Isabel Esterman]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/04/18144233/Banner_Agroforestry-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=297826</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Asia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Southeast Asia, Thailand, and Vietnam]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Adaptation To Climate Change, Agriculture, Agroecology, Agroforestry, Avoided Deforestation, Carbon Sequestration, Climate, Climate Change, Conservation, Conservation Solutions, Deforestation, Environment, Food, Forest Products, Forests, Green, Nature-based climate solutions, Solutions, Sustainability, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Agroforestry is recognized as a way to boost local biodiversity, improve soils and diversify farming incomes. New research suggests it may also benefit nearby forests by reducing pressure to clear them.<br />- The study found agroforestry has helped reduce deforestation across Southeast Asia by an estimated 250,319 hectares (618,552 acres) per year between 2015 and 2023, lowering emissions and underscoring its potential as a natural climate solution.<br />- However, the findings also indicate agroforestry worsened deforestation in many parts of the region, highlighting a nuanced bigger picture that experts say must be heeded.<br />- Local social, economic and ecological factors are pivotal in determining whether agroforestry’s impacts on nearby forests will be positive or negative, the authors say, and will depend on the prevalence of supportive policies.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Intensifying heat waves, extreme floods and forest fires have devastated parts of Southeast Asia in recent years, spurring experts and authorities to look for holistic solutions. Agroforestry, the practice of growing crops alongside useful trees and shrubs, is increasingly touted as one such solution that simultaneously addresses the biodiversity and climate crises while enhancing farmer livelihoods and meeting societal needs for food, timber and other key products. Now, a new study published in Nature Sustainability suggests the benefits of this more climate-friendly and sustainable farming method might extend even further. The findings reveal agroforestry has helped reduce deforestation across Southeast Asia by an estimated 250,319 hectares (618,552 acres) per year between 2015 and 2023, preventing between 43.3 million and 74.4 million tons of greenhouse gas emissions annually. “These diverse [agroforestry] systems can provide alternative sources of income [for farmers] — fuelwood, timber, fruits, and other products — reducing the economic pressure to clear more forests,” study lead author Steve Hoong Chen Teo, a researcher at the National University of Singapore, told Mongabay. Teo and his colleagues found that areas of Southeast Asia with agroforestry typically lost less forest than similar areas without it, resulting in a net reduction in deforestation across landscapes where agroforestry is practiced. The team suggest this is primarily due to the relative efficiency and profitability of agroforestry reducing farmers’ need to encroach into surrounding forests. “While benefits vary by region, overall we found that agroforestry can help conserve forest remnants in [agricultural] landscapes,” Teo said, adding&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2025/04/agroforestry-can-reduce-deforestation-but-supportive-policies-matter-study-finds/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/04/agroforestry-can-reduce-deforestation-but-supportive-policies-matter-study-finds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Political appointments in Indonesian climate program spark outcry over accountability</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/03/political-appointments-in-indonesian-climate-program-spark-outcry-over-accountability/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/03/political-appointments-in-indonesian-climate-program-spark-outcry-over-accountability/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>18 Mar 2025 08:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Hans Nicholas Jong]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Hans Nicholas Jong]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2023/09/28154349/fire-in-indonesia-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=295969</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Asia, Indonesia, Norway, Southeast Asia, and United Kingdom]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Carbon Emissions, Climate, Climate Change, climate finance, Conservation, Deforestation, Drivers Of Deforestation, Emission Reduction, Environment, Forest Carbon, Forests, Funding, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Peatlands, Politics, Rainforest Destruction, Rainforests, Threats To Rainforests, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Indonesian Forestry Minister Raja Juli Antoni has appointed seemingly unqualified members of his political party to a key program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, raising concerns over political favoritism and lack of climate expertise.<br />- The program is largely funded by Norway and the U.K., with critics warning that donor money is being misused for political appointments rather than forest conservation.<br />- Norway has called for accountability but remains passive, stating that fund allocation is Indonesia’s responsibility; activists have urged both Norway and the U.K. to audit spending and ensure funds aren&#8217;t misallocated.<br />- Experts warn that time is running out to meet Indonesia’s 2030 climate targets, and that failure could harm Indonesia’s global reputation and worsen climate-related disasters.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[JAKARTA — The Norwegian government is monitoring growing concerns over Indonesia’s decision to appoint political figures with little climate expertise to oversee a climate forestry program largely financed by Norway. Indonesian Forestry Minister Raja Juli Antoni has come under scrutiny recently for naming several fellow members from his political party, the Indonesian Solidarity Party (PSI), to key positions within the office responsible for the FOLU Net Sink 2030 initiative. This aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from Indonesia’s forestry and other land use (FOLU) sector by curbing deforestation, preventing forest fires, and increasing reforestation efforts. The ultimate goal is for Indonesia’s forests to absorb more carbon than they release by 2030, a part of the country’s climate commitments under the Paris Agreement. To coordinate, monitor and evaluate the program, the government established an operation management office (OMO). However, in a Jan. 31 decree, Forestry Minister Raja restructured the OMO by appointing PSI cadres to the office, raising concerns over political favoritism. Raja is one of the founders of the PSI and currently serves as its secretary-general, the party’s No. 2. The appointments have also drawn criticism due to the OMO’s relatively high monthly salaries, ranging from 8 million rupiah at the lowest level to 50 million rupiah for leadership positions ($500-$3,000). Critics say these salaries are excessive for a government-backed environmental initiative, particularly at a time when the government is cutting the budget for several agencies, including those related to the environment. Raja has defended the appointments, saying the OMO&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2025/03/political-appointments-in-indonesian-climate-program-spark-outcry-over-accountability/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/03/political-appointments-in-indonesian-climate-program-spark-outcry-over-accountability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>What have we learned from 15 years of REDD+ policy research? (analysis)</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/03/what-have-we-learned-from-15-years-of-redd-policy-research-analysis/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/03/what-have-we-learned-from-15-years-of-redd-policy-research-analysis/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>07 Mar 2025 00:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Grace WongMaria BrockhausMoira Moeliono]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/03/06234000/44352584784_a723121472_k-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=295437</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Global]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Analysis, Avoided Deforestation, Climate, Climate Change, Commentary, Deforestation, Forests, Governance, Land Rights, Rainforests, Redd, Social Justice, Tropical Deforestation, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- The Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation program (REDD+) is supposed to provide participating countries, jurisdictions and communities in the Global South with incentives to protect their forests.<br />- This analysis draws on more than a decade of comparative research and identifies a broad array of actors involved in REDD+, with large power differences between them. The authors argue that the power imbalances among these groups are obstructing progress toward shifting away from “business-as-usual” deforestation in the tropics.<br />- The ambition for sustainable forest “transformation” is at risk of being co-opted by those who stand to benefit from maintaining the status quo, and the authors say it is therefore important for the research community to keep asking what proposed reforms and changes may represent, and whom they serve.<br />- This article is an analysis. The views expressed are those of the authors, not necessarily of Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[For decades, efforts to halt deforestation in the Global South have gained much attention within the policy arena, most recently as a powerful and effective measure to mitigate climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. One well-known initiative is the framework on “Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries, plus the sustainable management of forests and the conservation and enhancement of forest carbon stocks,” or REDD+, which was adopted in 2013 at the U.N. Climate Change Conference (COP19) in Warsaw and built on the original REDD program, which launched five years earlier. REDD+ is supposed to channel a global willingness to pay for forest conservation through public funds or carbon markets, providing participating countries and jurisdictions in the Global South with incentives for forest protection. REDD+ project in Jambi province, Sumatra, Indonesia. Photo by Icaro Cooke Vieira/CIFOR-ICRAF. Over time, REDD+ has evolved considerably. It has been translated and assembled in highly diverse ways and at various speeds in national forest and climate policy arenas. Initially, REDD+ was considered a “low-hanging-fruit” approach to mitigate climate change — a quick and inexpensive scheme. However, a large body of research has, unsurprisingly, shown that REDD+ is much costlier and more contested than expected. Since 2009, the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) has led the Global Comparative Study on REDD+ with the aim of understanding which conditions can enable and hinder desired change away from policies and politics that favor deforestation. The study also sought to determine how REDD+ implementation&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2025/03/what-have-we-learned-from-15-years-of-redd-policy-research-analysis/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2025/03/what-have-we-learned-from-15-years-of-redd-policy-research-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>What’s the TFFF? A forest finance tool ‘like no other’ shows potential</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/podcast/2024/12/whats-the-tfff-a-forest-finance-tool-like-no-other-shows-promise-pitfalls/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/podcast/2024/12/whats-the-tfff-a-forest-finance-tool-like-no-other-shows-promise-pitfalls/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>16 Dec 2024 23:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Mike DiGirolamo]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
															<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/12/12205524/ecuador_230747-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=291545</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Amazon, Colombia, Global, South America, and Tropics]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Conservation, Conservation Finance, Conservation Solutions, Corporations, Deforestation, Economics, Environment, Finance, Forests, Innovation, Interviews, Interviews With Environmental Journalists, Rainforests, Saving Rainforests, Solutions, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[In 2023, at the COP28 climate summit in Dubai, the Brazilian government proposed a new funding mechanism to help tropical nations keep their forests standing. They called it the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF), and its incentive is relatively simple: using satellite monitoring in participating nations to determine which ones have preserved their forests, and [&#8230;]]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[In 2023, at the COP28 climate summit in Dubai, the Brazilian government proposed a new funding mechanism to help tropical nations keep their forests standing. They called it the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF), and its incentive is relatively simple: using satellite monitoring in participating nations to determine which ones have preserved their forests, and rewarding them based on that data. Fast-forward to the COP16 biodiversity summit in Cali, Colombia, in 2024. Mongabay contributor Justin Catanoso attended the conference and covered the new fund, which functions not as a donation mechanism or loan but rather as an investment portfolio. The money is “not going to a country as a loan that they have to repay. The investors get paid back first, and the money that is generated by the investments above what the investors get is what will be given to the tropical countries,” he says. On this episode of Mongabay’s podcast, we speak with Catanoso, Charlotte Streck — co-founder of Climate Focus, an advisory firm — and Frédéric Hache, a lecturer in sustainable finance at the Paris Institute of Political Studies, about the TFFF. These three guests answer some of the more complicated and critical questions regarding what the proposed facility could — and would not — do. The fund is currently a proposal and is therefore subject to change before it’s officially launched at the COP30 climate summit in Belém, Brazil, in 2025. But so far, there’s a mixture of optimism and skepticism regarding its potential as a&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/podcast/2024/12/whats-the-tfff-a-forest-finance-tool-like-no-other-shows-promise-pitfalls/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/podcast/2024/12/whats-the-tfff-a-forest-finance-tool-like-no-other-shows-promise-pitfalls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Do forest conservation pledges work? (commentary)</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/11/do-forest-conservation-pledges-work-commentary/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/11/do-forest-conservation-pledges-work-commentary/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>06 Nov 2024 17:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Matthew Spencer]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2023/12/02013159/kalbar_drone_190676_23-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=289741</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Global, New York, North America, and United States]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Commentary, Conservation, Deforestation, Environment, Forests, Governance, Rainforests, Temperate Forests, Tropical Forests, and Zero Deforestation Commitments]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- The New York Declaration on Forests was agreed with great hope 10 years ago, but the world missed its 2020 target and is off track to end deforestation by 2030. Does this mean that forest pledges don’t work?<br />- It would be naive to expect pledges like it to quickly resolve decades long economic and political battles over land: their effect is limited without changes to forest funding, because forest clearance is usually driven by economic calculation.<br />- &#8220;The NYDF has not made history, but it did help redirect attention in a distracted world and create a benchmark for progress. Without it and the Glasgow Declaration, there would be less support for the many communities and institutions who are helping protect the two thirds of remaining tropical forests which are still standing,&#8221; a new op-ed states.<br />- This article is a commentary. The views expressed are those of the author, not necessarily Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[In late September 2014 a besuited and bearded Leonardo DiCaprio stood at the grey marble dais in the UN General Assembly in New York and declared somberly that world leaders had to ‘make history or be vilified by it.’ The pressure was mounting for climate action and governments, companies and NGOs responded with a blizzard of announcements including the high-profile New York Declaration on Forests (NYDF), which committed signatories to halve deforestation by 2020, and end it by 2030. Sadly, in the years immediately following the signing, deforestation actually increased, and the first target was missed. Deforestation has been on a downward trend since 2017 but the world is currently off track to end forest loss by the end of the decade. The perceived failure of the New York Declaration is a key reason the EU is introducing its tough new deforestation regulation (EUDR). At this year’s New York Climate Week there were lots of forest events but no discussion on the NYDF, or what its weakness might mean for its ‘upgraded’ Glasgow version agreed three years ago, with even greater support. It was therefore a surprise find that many veterans of forest policy I spoke to there felt that the New York Declaration had been worthwhile, despite the failure to meet its 2020 target. There were also people who felt it had been a mistake to get companies and governments to sign up to a target that they didn’t know how to deliver, and a veteran NGO staffer recalled&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2024/11/do-forest-conservation-pledges-work-commentary/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/11/do-forest-conservation-pledges-work-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Is the delay of Europe&#8217;s deforestation regulation a cause for regret, or an opportunity? (commentary)</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/11/is-the-delay-of-europes-deforestation-regulation-a-cause-for-regret-or-an-opportunity-commentary/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/11/is-the-delay-of-europes-deforestation-regulation-a-cause-for-regret-or-an-opportunity-commentary/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>05 Nov 2024 17:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Alain Karsenty]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2022/11/01154714/cocoa-colombia-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=289700</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Europe and European Union]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Beef, Cacao, Commentary, Conservation, Deforestation, Environment, Forests, Governance, International Trade, Rubber, Soy, Trade, Tropical Deforestation, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- In early October, the European Commission proposed a one-year postponement of the EU&#8217;s new deforestation regulation (EUDR) in order to assist global stakeholders, member states and other countries in their preparations.<br />- Is such a delay to be lamented, as many NGOs and commentators say? This is happening in a context of the weakening of many environmental measures, after all.<br />- &#8220;This ambitious regulation, with its undeniable objectives, is ill-conceived &#8211; because it ignores the problems of implementation &#8211; and is giving rise to unprecedented diplomatic tensions. Shouldn&#8217;t we take advantage of this probable postponement to try and correct some of the text&#8217;s major flaws?&#8221; a new op-ed asks.<br />- This article is a commentary. The views expressed are those of the author, not necessarily Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[A European Commission project to counter deforestation and forest degradation associated with &#8220;the making available on the Union market as well as the export&#8221; of certain agricultural products was unveiled in November 2021. The &#8220;Deforestation and Forest Degradation Regulation&#8221; (EUDR) was adopted in June 2023, and was due to come into force in early 2025 for large companies. But in early October 2024, the EC proposed a one-year postponement &#8220;in order to assist global stakeholders, member states and third countries in their preparations.&#8221; A few months earlier, the Commission had postponed publication of the benchmarking analysis, which classifies countries into three risk categories (low, standard, high). The level of risk should determine the level of due diligence that importers must carry out when acquiring production that may have been associated with deforestation or degradation. Operators may be penalized for failing to carry out due diligence, even if it turns out that the imported product has not contributed to deforestation. The regulation stipulates that, before a product is offered for sale on the European market (or exported), each operator will have to guarantee that it is not associated with deforested land after December 31, 2020, by geolocating the parcels from which it originates using a traceability system. Farmers (and foresters) will have to upload traceability data, including GPS coordinates, which will be compared with satellite images. The indication of plot boundaries is compulsory from four hectares upwards. Cattle ranching is a key driver of deforestation in the Amazon. Image courtesy of&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2024/11/is-the-delay-of-europes-deforestation-regulation-a-cause-for-regret-or-an-opportunity-commentary/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/11/is-the-delay-of-europes-deforestation-regulation-a-cause-for-regret-or-an-opportunity-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Carbon markets must recognize Indigenous &#8216;high forest, low deforestation&#8217; areas (commentary)</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/10/carbon-markets-must-recognize-indigenous-high-forest-low-deforestation-areas-commentary/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/10/carbon-markets-must-recognize-indigenous-high-forest-low-deforestation-areas-commentary/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>24 Oct 2024 16:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/10/23210438/amazon_200811-e1729717552493-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=289126</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Global, Latin America, Panama, Peru, and South America]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, carbon, Carbon Market, Carbon Offsets, Climate, Climate Change, Climate Justice, Commentary, Conservation, Deforestation, Drivers Of Deforestation, Forests, Indigenous Peoples, Indigenous Reserves, Rainforests, Social Justice, Tropical Deforestation, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- &#8220;We have lived in and safeguarded our forests for generations, helping maintain biodiverse ecosystems designated as high forest, low deforestation (HFLD) areas, which are regions with historically low deforestation,&#8221; two Indigenous leaders write in a new op-ed.<br />- Carbon markets have mostly focused on areas with pre-existing deforestation, but communities like these with historically low deforestation need financing to support their conservation work, too, so shouldn&#8217;t HFLD regions get better access to the voluntary carbon market?<br />- &#8220;For too long, Indigenous and local communities who have preserved forests without compensation have been excluded from financial benefits linked to forest conservation. This is not just an environmental issue, but a matter of climate justice,&#8221; they argue.<br />- This article is a commentary. The views expressed are those of the authors, not necessarily Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[For us, protecting our forests is like protecting our families. They are our homes. They give us life. For decades, we’ve witnessed deforestation destroy large areas of tropical forests, where people saw them worth more dead than alive. Our forests have avoided that fate, as we’ve fought for protections to designate them as Indigenous territories. But now our forests are under threat. We represent Indigenous communities from the Peruvian Amazon and Panama. We have lived in and safeguarded our forests for generations, helping maintain biodiverse ecosystems designated as high forest, low deforestation (HFLD) areas, which are regions with historically low deforestation. Our forests store immense amounts of carbon and are home to rich biodiversity. Yet carbon markets have not adequately acknowledged our efforts to keep forests standing in these regions. As a result, our communities risk missing out on critical financing that could be made available by the voluntary carbon market. That is why the communal reserves in Peru, represented by the National Association of Executors of the Communal Reserves Administration Contract (ANECAP) and many other Indigenous communities in tropical forests countries like Panama, have been defending HFLD crediting approaches as a way to channel funds to help our communities combat the escalating forces driving deforestation. Forest in Guna territory, Panama. Image courtesy of Onel Masardule. Compensation for our efforts Our communities’ practices to conserve forests have been in place for decades and are helping keep forests standing today and into the future. In the Communal Reserves of the Peruvian&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2024/10/carbon-markets-must-recognize-indigenous-high-forest-low-deforestation-areas-commentary/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/10/carbon-markets-must-recognize-indigenous-high-forest-low-deforestation-areas-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Study: REDD+ doesn’t work without Indigenous peoples, but fails to engage them</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/10/study-redd-doesnt-work-without-indigenous-peoples-but-fails-to-engage-them/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/10/study-redd-doesnt-work-without-indigenous-peoples-but-fails-to-engage-them/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>24 Oct 2024 15:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Sarah Brown]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Alexandra Popescu]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/10/24151144/Indigenous-mobilization-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=289159</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Latin America]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Biodiversity, carbon, Carbon Emissions, climate finance, Conservation, Conservation Solutions, Deforestation, Ecosystems, Forest Carbon, Forest Destruction, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Indigenous Peoples, Indigenous Rights, Redd, and Restoration]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Climate policies like REDD+ often fail to prioritize Indigenous peoples, undermining their effectiveness in tackling the root causes of deforestation and climate change, according to a recent study.<br />- The authors propose 12 principles to improve climate policies, based on themes such as supporting Indigenous territorial defense and their rights, encouraging Indigenous-led climate initiatives, and directing climate funding to these populations.<br />- Indigenous-led initiatives like RIA in the Amazon offer a feasible alternative to REDD+ and emphasize the importance of compensating them for their ecological services; however, they face challenges in getting adequate funding.<br />- Experts suggest that the lessons learned from REDD+ could be applied to the development of biodiversity credits to help make this emerging climate solution more inclusive from the get-go.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[The United Nations’ framework for reducing emissions by protecting forests in less-industrialized countries, known as REDD+, isn’t doing enough to prioritize Indigenous peoples in the Amazon. That’s the finding from a new study, which proposes a dozen principles for giving local and traditional communities, the long-standing stewards of those very forests, more decision-making power within REDD+. “The importance of Indigenous Peoples in the protection of the Amazon is not reflected in the design of international climate policy,” the study says. “Given their historical and ongoing struggles against extraction, guidance from Indigenous Peoples must be central to any climate justice approach for mitigating deforestation in the Amazon.” The study groups the 12 principles for improving existing climate policies into four categories: Indigenous territorial defense, Indigenous-led climate initiatives, safeguarding Indigenous peoples’ rights to strengthen existing policies, and equitable climate finance and benefit sharing to enable these types of improvements. The paper’s authors say these recommendations could apply both to the design of new climate programs and to a “justice-oriented reimagining of REDD+.” Cattle raising in the Amazon rainforest. Environmentalists claim that climate policies like REDD+ should prioritize addressing the key drivers of deforestation, such as large-scale cattle ranching, rather than focusing on small-scale land clearing by local communities. Image © Bruno Kelly/Greenpeace. “We do not advocate for the continued use of REDD+ as it is currently conceived, [but] we recognize that it will likely stay around,” they write. “It [is] imperative to present an alternative and to suggest ways to improve current&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2024/10/study-redd-doesnt-work-without-indigenous-peoples-but-fails-to-engage-them/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/10/study-redd-doesnt-work-without-indigenous-peoples-but-fails-to-engage-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>With Europe&#8217;s move to delay tropical forest protections, everything burns (commentary)</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/10/with-europes-move-to-delay-tropical-forest-protections-everything-burns-commentary/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/10/with-europes-move-to-delay-tropical-forest-protections-everything-burns-commentary/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>10 Oct 2024 19:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Etelle Higonnet]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/09/28141039/GP0SU2G4C_24_1-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=288541</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Europe and European Union]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Activism, agribusiness, Agriculture, Avoided Deforestation, Commentary, Commodity agriculture, Deforestation, Environment, Forests, Governance, Regulations, Tropical Deforestation, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Last week, the European Commission flip-flopped and announced it wants to delay a new law designed to reduce tropical deforestation (EUDR) for a year, instead of allowing it start in January 2025. <br />- This decision isn’t just destructive for forests, it’s also bad for business &#8212; it flies in the face of hard efforts by thousands of companies who did everything to get into compliance on time &#8212; and is also bad for democracy, a new op-ed argues.<br />- &#8220;For the millions of EU citizens who supported the law, here is a message of hope. We lost a battle with the Commission&#8217;s effort to delay the EUDR, but the war for our climate still hangs in the balance, and the fight is on. European elected representatives can yet stand firm in support of the global forests and millions of people who depend on them, and reject the Commission’s proposal.&#8221;<br />- This article is a commentary. The views expressed are those of the author, not necessarily Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[Forests. We can&#8217;t live without them. If they burn, we die. Many forests are at risk today. The Amazon has been so damaged that it may shift from being a carbon sink to a carbon source and morph into a savanna. Scientists overwhelmingly tell us that if humanity wants a future on a habitable planet, we must protect our last forests that remain. Experts agree that to avert climate chaos, we must immediately halt and reverse global deforestation. For a while it seemed that the EU was stepping up to save global forests, with a bold, beautiful law called the &#8220;EU Deforestation Regulation&#8221; or EUDR. Last week, the EU Commission flip-flopped and announced it wants to delay the law for a year, instead of allowing the law to enter into force in January 2025. And it gets worse: delaying automatically means opening up the law to get watered down. Farms or forests? Commodity crops such as soy are major drivers of tropical deforestation. Image courtesy of Marizilda Cruppe/Greenpeace. This decision isn’t just destructive for forests, it’s also bad for business: it flies in the face of hard efforts by thousands of companies who did everything to get into compliance on time. Indeed, roughly 15,000 companies had spoken out for the EUDR and its sister law, the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive. Investors representing north of $6 trillion in assets under management supported such regulation. It&#8217;s also bad for democracy: civil society clamored for the EUDR, with millions of people signing petitions, attending protests, writing letters, and making calls, or speaking out in&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2024/10/with-europes-move-to-delay-tropical-forest-protections-everything-burns-commentary/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/10/with-europes-move-to-delay-tropical-forest-protections-everything-burns-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Record number of Indigenous land titles granted in Peru via innovative process (commentary)</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/09/record-number-of-indigenous-land-titles-granted-in-peru-via-innovative-process-commentary/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/09/record-number-of-indigenous-land-titles-granted-in-peru-via-innovative-process-commentary/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>06 Sep 2024 15:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Miguel Guimaraes VasquezWendy Pineda]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Erik Hoffner]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/09/06151550/Peru-IP-land-titles-e1725636785645-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=287025</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Amazon, Latin America, Peru, and South America]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Avoided Deforestation, Commentary, Conservation, Deforestation, Environment, Governance, Happy-upbeat Environmental, Indigenous Peoples, Indigenous Reserves, Indigenous Rights, Land Rights, Law, and Rainforests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Land titles have proven to be the most effective way to protect Indigenous peoples’ land from deforestation, with such territories experiencing a 66% decrease in deforestation, and therefore protecting these forests for generations to come.<br />- Recently, 37 land titles were secured in the Peruvian Amazon in record time, between June 2023 to May 2024, via a partnership between two NGOs and the Peruvian government, using an innovative, low-cost, high-impact model to expedite the process.<br />- &#8220;We believe this model can be replicated in other regions of the Amazon and perhaps even beyond,&#8221; the authors of a new op-ed write.<br />- This post is a commentary. The views expressed are those of the authors, not necessarily Mongabay.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[In a defining moment for the rights of Indigenous peoples in Peru, 37 land titles were secured in the Amazon in record time, from June 2023 to May 2024. This is not only a remarkable land rights victory for the region, but it also marks a significant step towards addressing climate change, reclaiming Indigenous peoples’ sovereignty and rights, and defending territories against external threats. Land titles have proven to be the most effective way to protect Indigenous peoples’ land from deforestation, with titled land experiencing a 66% decrease in deforestation. Legal land ownership allows Indigenous communities to hold illegal loggers and land-grabbers accountable. Additionally, these titled lands act as a buffer zone, protecting adjacent Indigenous territories from invasion. Deforestation is a global concern, but for the Indigenous communities of Peru, it is also about preserving their heritage, culture, and very existence. The process of securing land titles ranges from slow and bureaucratic to extremely dangerous. In Peru, more than 30 Indigenous leaders have been murdered over the past two decades for seeking titles for their territories and the recognition of their ancestral lands. A partnership between AIDESEP, the Rainforest Foundation US, and the Peruvian government has enabled an innovative, low-cost, high-impact model to expedite community land titling in record time. Image courtesy of Sacha Cine/Rainforest Foundation US. The Interethnic Association for the Development of the Peruvian Rainforest (AIDESEP) has been working since the 1980s to raise funds and petition the Peruvian government for the recognition and titling of our lands.&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2024/09/record-number-of-indigenous-land-titles-granted-in-peru-via-innovative-process-commentary/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/09/record-number-of-indigenous-land-titles-granted-in-peru-via-innovative-process-commentary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
						<item>
					<title>Sugarcane megaproject poses latest threat to Papua’s forests, communities</title>
					<link>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/06/sugarcane-megaproject-poses-latest-threat-to-papuas-forests-communities/</link>
					<comments>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/06/sugarcane-megaproject-poses-latest-threat-to-papuas-forests-communities/#respond</comments>
					<pubDate>19 Jun 2024 15:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
											<dc:creator>
							<![CDATA[Hans Nicholas JongSarjan Lahay]]>
						</dc:creator>
										<author>
						<![CDATA[Hayat Indriyatno]]>
					</author>
							<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
										<enclosure url="https://imgs.mongabay.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2019/03/28063848/IMG_5021-768x512.jpg" type="image/jpeg" />
					<guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.mongabay.com/?p=283450</guid>

					
											<locations>
							<![CDATA[Asia, Indonesia, Papua, and Southeast Asia]]>
						</locations>
					
											<topic-tags>
							<![CDATA[Activism, Alternative Energy, Avoided Deforestation, Biodiversity, Bioenergy, Biofuels, Climate, Climate Change, Deforestation, Drivers Of Deforestation, Energy, Environment, Food, Forest Destruction, Forest Loss, Forests, Indigenous Peoples, Indigenous Rights, Plantations, Rainforests, Renewable Energy, Sugar, Tropical Deforestation, and Tropical Forests]]>
						</topic-tags>
					
					
												<description>
								<![CDATA[- Activists have warned of wide-ranging environmental and social impacts from a plan to establish 2 million hectares (nearly 5 million acres) of sugarcane plantations in Merauke district, in Indonesia’s Papua region.<br />- The plan calls for deforesting an area six times the size of Jakarta, even as the government touts the green credentials of the project in the form of the bioethanol that it plans to produce from the sugar.<br />- Activists have also warned that the project risks becoming yet another land grab that deprives Indigenous Papuans of their customary lands and rights without fair compensation.<br />- They add the warning signs are all there, including close parallels to similarly ambitious projects that failed, the alleged involvement of palm oil firms, and government insistences that this richly forested region of Indonesia doesn’t have much forest left.<br />]]>
							</description>
																						<content:encoded>
							<![CDATA[JAKARTA — The Indonesian government plans to establish 2 million hectares, or nearly 5 million acres, of sugarcane plantations in the eastern region of Papua, home to the last great expanse of rainforest in Southeast Asia. The country’s investment minister, Bahlil Lahadalia, said the land, spanning an area 30 times the size of Jakarta, was available in Merauke district. He denied that this biodiverse landscape constituted “natural forest,” and justified clearing it in the interest of weaning Indonesia off sugar imports entirely by 2027. The government also has plans to develop cane-derived bioethanol as part of its transition away from fossil fuels. “Our country is one of the world’s largest in size. But [when] sugar price increases, we always import. We keep importing [sugar],” Bahlil said in Jakarta on April 29. Bahlil leads a task force formed by President Joko Widodo to allocate land for the project and streamline the licensing process for interested companies. To date, five consortiums, consisting of Indonesian and foreign companies, are confirmed to be participating in the 130 trillion rupiah ($7.9 billion) project, with roles ranging from developing sugarcane plantations and processing mills, to building the power plants to run them. One of the first orders of business is to rezone 419,000 hectares ( million acres) of forested area, six times the size of Jakarta, into non-forest area, thereby allowing it to be deforested — legally. In South Papua province alone, this amounts to 25,654 hectares (63,392 acres) of intact forest that’s been approved for clearing, according&hellip;This article was originally published on <a href="https://news.mongabay.com/2024/06/sugarcane-megaproject-poses-latest-threat-to-papuas-forests-communities/" data-wpel-link="internal">Mongabay</a>]]>
						</content:encoded>
										<wfw:commentRss>https://news.mongabay.com/2024/06/sugarcane-megaproject-poses-latest-threat-to-papuas-forests-communities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
					<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
														</item>
			</channel>
</rss>