1. Araujo, M., Kant, S. & Couto, L. (2009). Why Brazilian companies are certifying their forests? For. Policy Econ., 11, 579–585

2. Armstrong, S. (2000). Report by Edinburgh Center for Tropical Forests (ECTF) On Reduced Impact Logging Research: Activities and Outputs for the Barama Company Limited. ECTF, Edinburgh

3. Asner, G.P., Keller, M., Pereira, J.R., Zweede, J.C. & Silva, J.N.M. (2004). Canopy Damage and Recovery After Selective Logging in Amazonia : Field and Satellite Studies. Ecol. Appl., 14, 280–298

4. Bacha, C.J.C. & Rodriguez, L.C.E. (2007). Profitability and social impacts of reduced impact logging in the Tapajós National Forest, Brazil – A case study. Ecol. Econ., 63, 70–77

5. Barreto, P., Amaral, P., Vidal, E. & Uhl, C. (1998). Costs and benefits of forest management for timber production in eastern Amazonia. Forestry, 9–26

6. Bertault, J.-G. & Sist, P. (1997). An experimental comparison of different harvesting intensities with reduced-impact and conventional logging in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. For. Ecol. Manage., 94, 209–218

7. Bicknell, J.E., Struebig, M.J., Edwards, D.P. & Davies, Z.G. (2014). Improved timber harvest techniques maintain biodiversity in tropical forests. Curr. Biol., 24, 1119–1120

8. Blackman, A., Goff, L. & Rivera Planter, M. (2015). Does Eco-certification Stem Tropical Deforestation? Resour. Futur., 15–36

9. Boltz, F., Carter, D.R., Holmes, T.P. & Pereira R., J. (2001). Financial returns under uncertainty for conventional and reduced-impact logging in permanent production forests of the Brazilian Amazon. Ecol. Econ., 39, 387–398

10. Burivalova, Z., Lee, T.M., Giam, X., Wilcove, D.S. & Koh, L.P. (2015). Avian responses to selective logging shaped by species traits and logging practices. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 282

11. Cerutti, P.O., Lescuyer, G., Tacconi, L., Eba’atyi, R., Essiane, R., Nasi, R., et al. (2016). Social impacts of the Forest Stewardship Council certification in the Congo basin. Int. For. Rev., 19, 1–14

12. Chaudhary, A., Burivalova, Z., Koh, L.P. & Hellweg, S. (2016). Impact of Forest Management on Species Richness: Global Meta-Analysis and Economic Trade-Offs. Sci. Rep., 6, 23954

13. Dagang, A.A., Richter, F., Hanh, S. & Manggil, P. (2002). Financial and economic analyses of conventional and reduced impact harvesting systems in Sarawak. FAO RAP Publication 2002/14

14. Damette, O. & Delacote, P. (2011). Unsustainable timber harvesting, deforestation and the role of certification. Ecol. Econ., 70, 1211–1219

15. Davis, A.J. (2000). Does Reduced-Impact Logging Help Preserve Biodiversity in Tropical Rainforests? A Case Study from Borneo using Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) as Indicators. Environ. Entomol., 29, 467–475

16. Dwiprabowo, H., Grulois, S., Sist, P. & Kartawinata, K. (2002). Cost-benefit analysis of reduced-impact logging in a lowland Dipterocart forest of Malinau, East Kalimantan. Forest, Science and Sustainability: The Bulungan Model Forest. ITTO Technical Report, Yokohama, Japan

17. Feldpausch, T.R., Jirka, S., Passos, C.A.M., Jasper, F. & Riha, S.J. (2005). When big trees fall: Damage and carbon export by reduced impact logging in southern Amazonia. For. Ecol. Manage., 219, 199–215

18. Holmes, T.P., Blate, G.M., Zweede, J.C., Pereira, R., Barreto, P., Boltz, F., et al. (2002). Financial and ecological indicators of reduced impact logging performance in the eastern Amazon. For. Ecol. Manage., 163, 93–110

19. van der Hout, P. (1999). Reduced Impact Logging in the Tropical Rain Forest of Guyana: Ecological, Economic, and Silvicultural Consequences. Tropenbos-Guyana Ser., 6

20. Imai, N., Samejima, H., Langner, A., Ong, R.C., Kita, S., Titin, J., et al. (2009). Co-benefits of sustainable forest management in biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration. PLoS One, 4

21. Kollert, W. & Lagan, P. (2007). Do certified tropical logs fetch a market premium?. A comparative price analysis from Sabah, Malaysia. For. Policy Econ., 9, 862–868

22. Martin, P.A., Newton, A.C., Pfeifer, M., Khoo, M. & Bullock, J.M. (2015). Impacts of tropical selective logging on carbon storage and tree species richness: A meta-analysis. For. Ecol. Manage., in press

23. Mattsson-Marn, H., Vel, E., de Jongh, O. & Hui, D.C.K. (1981). Planning and cost studies in harvesting in the mixed dipterocarp forest of Sarawak: Part I. Based on maps derived from ground survey. ( No. FO: MAL/76/008). FAO, Rome, Italy

24. Medjibe, V.P. & Putz, F.E. (2012). Cost comparisons of reduced-impact and conventional logging in the tropics. J. For. Econ., 18, 242–256

25. Medjibe, V.P., Putz, F.E. & Romero, C. (2013). Certified and uncertified logging concessions compared in Gabon: Changes in stand structure, tree species, and biomass. Environ. Manage., 51, 524–540

26. Miteva, D.A., Loucks, C.J. & Pattanayak, S.K. (2015). Social and Environmental Impacts of Forest Management Certification in Indonesia. PLoS One, 1–18

27. Montenegro, F. (1996). Extraccion Forestal de Bajo Impacto en La Mayronga. Fundacion Forestal Juan Manuel Durini/ITTO, Quito, Ecuador. Data in English here.

28. Nebel, G., Quevedo, L., Bredahl Jacobsen, J. & Helles, F. (2005). Development and economic significance of forest certification: The case of FSC in Bolivia. For. Policy Econ., 7, 175–186

29. Parren, M. & Bongers, F. (2001). Does climber cutting reduce felling damage in southern Cameroon? For. Ecol. Manage., 141, 175–188

30. Pearce, D., Putz, F.E. & Vanclay, J.K. (2003). Sustainable forestry in the tropics: panacea or folly? For. Ecol. Manage., 172, 229–247

31. Pereira, R., Zweede, J., Asner, G.P. & Keller, M. (2002). Forest canopy damage and recovery in reduced-impact and conventional selective logging in eastern Para, Brazil. For. Ecol. Manage., 168, 77–89

32. Pinard, M. a & Putz, F.E. (1996). Retaining forest biomass by reducing logging damage. Biotropica, 28, 278–295

33. Pinard, M. a, Putz, F.E. & Tay, J. (2000). Lessons learned from the implementation of reduced-impact logging in hilly terrain in Sabah, Malaysia. Int. For. Rev.

34. Putz, F.E. & Pinard, M.A. (1993). Reduced-Impact Logging as a Carbon-Offset Method. Conserv. Biol., 7, 755–757

35. Saharudin, A.S., Brodie, J.D. & Sessions, J. (1999). Analysis of two alternative harvesting systems in Peninsular Malaysia: sensitivity analysis of costs, logging damage and buffers. J. Trop. For. Sci., 11, 809–821

36. Simula, M., Astana, S., Ishmael, R., Santana, E.J. & Schmidt, M.L. (2004). Financial Cost-Benfit Analysis of Forest Certification and Implementation of Phased Approaches. Yokohama, Japan

37. Sist, P., Sheil, D., Kartawinata, K. & Priyadi, H. (2003). Reduced-impact logging in Indonesian Borneo: Some results confirming the need for new silvicultural prescriptions. For. Ecol. Manage., 179, 415–427

38. Sollmann, R., Mohamed, A., Niedballa, J., Bender, J., Ambu, L., Lagan, P., et al. (2017). Quantifying mammal biodiversity co-benefits in certified tropical forests. Divers. Distrib., 23, 317–328

39. Tay, J., Healey, J.R. & Price, C. (2002). Financial assessment of reduced-impact logging techniques in Sabah, Malaysia. In: FAO 2002 International Conference Proceedings (eds. Enters, T., Durst, T., Applegate, G.B., Kho, P.C.S. & Man, G.). FAO, Bangkok, Thailand

40. Winkler, N. (1997). Environmentally Sound Forest Harvesting: Testing the Applicability of the FAO Model Code in the Amazon in Brazil. Forest Harvesting Case Study 8. Forest Harvesting Case Study 8, FAO, Rome, Italy