References for “Do environmental advocacy campaigns drive successful forest conservation?”


  1. Abdullah A.N. et al. (2015). World Wild Fund Malaysia on the World Wide web: Save orangutan campaigns through the power of photographs. Asian Social Science, 11(17). doi:
  2. Affolderbach, J. (2011). Environmental bargains: Power struggles and decision making over British Columbia’s and Tasmania’s old-growth forests. Economic Geography, 87:2, 181-206. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01107.x
  3. Arima, E. et al. (2011). Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters, 6:1-8. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024010
  4. Austin K.G. et al. (2017). Shifting patterns of oil palm driven deforestation in Indonesia and implications for zero-deforestation commitments. Land Use Policy, 69:41-48. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.036
  5. Azevedo A.A. et al. (2015). Commodity production in Brazil: Combining zero deforestation and zero illegality. Elementa, 3:76.
  6. Bates, C. (2010). Use of social marketing concepts to evaluate ocean sustainability campaigns. Social Marketing Quarterly, 16:1, 71-96. doi:10.1080/15245000903528357
  7. Brown, S. and Zarin, D. (2013). What does zero deforestation mean? Science, 342: 805-807. doi: 10.1126/science.1241277
  8. Busch, J. et al. (2015). Reductions in emissions from deforestation from Indonesia’s moratorium on new oil palm, timber, and logging concessions. PNAS, 112(5):1328–1333. doi:10.1073/pnas.1412514112
  9. Cashore, B. and Vertinsky, I. (2000). Policy networks and firm behaviours: Governance systems and firm responses to external demands for sustainable forest management. Policy Sciences, 33: 1-30. doi:10.1023/A:1004728206505
  10. Dauvergne, P. (2017). Is the power of brand-focused activism rising? The case of tropical deforestation. Journal of Environment and Development, 26(2) 135–155. doi:10.1177/1070496517701249
  11. Delacote, P. (2009). On the sources of consumer boycotts ineffectiveness. The Journal of Environment and Development, 18(3):306-322. doi:10.1177/1070496509338849
  12. Fox, J.A. and Brown, L.D. (1998). Assessing the impact of NGO advocacy campaigns on World Bank projects and policies. In Fox, J.A. and Brown, L.D. The struggle for accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and grassroots movements. MIT Press.
  13. Gerber, J.F. (2011). Conflicts over industrial tree plantations in the South: Who, how and why? Global Environmental Change, 21, 165–176. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.005
  14. Gibbs, H.K. et al. (2015). Brazil’s soy moratorium. Science, 347 (6220):377-378. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa0181
  15. Gibbs, H.K. et al. (2016). Did ranchers and slaughterhouses respond to zero-deforestation agreements in the Brazilian Amazon? Conservation Letters, 9(1), 32–42. doi:10.1111/conl.12175
  16. Gritten, D. and Kant, P. (2007). Assessing the impact of environmental campaigns against the activities of a pulp and paper company in Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 9(4):819-834. doi:10.1505/ifor.9.4.819
  17. Gritten, D. et al. (2012). Environmental campaigns against forest companies: What are the campaigns trying to achieve? Forest Systems, 21(2), 247-258. doi:10.5424/fs/2012212-02664
  18. Heilmayr, R. and Lambin, E.F. (2016). Impacts of nonstate, market-driven governance on Chilean forests. PNAS, 133(11):2910-2915. doi:10.1073/pnas.1600394113
  19. Holzer, B. (2001). Transnational protest and the corporate planet – the case of Mitsubishi Corporation vs. The rainforest action network. Asian Journal of Social Science, 29(1): 73-86.
  20. Humphreys, D. (2004). Redefining the issues: NGO influence on international forest negotiations. Global Environmental Politics, 4(2):51-74. doi:10.1162/152638004323074192
  21. Kastens, J. H. et al. (2017). Soy moratorium impacts on soybean and deforestation dynamics in Mato Grosso, Brazil. PLoS ONE, 12(4) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176168
  22. Khor, Y.L. (2011). The oil palm industry bows to NGO campaigns. Lipid Technology, Vol. 23, No. 5. doi:10.1002/lite.201100106
  23. Mac Sheoin, T. (2014). Transnational anti-corporate campaigns: Fail often, fail better. Social Justice, 41(1/2): 135-136.
  24. Myers, H. and Summerville, T. (2004). Anti-use campaigns and resource communities: The consequences of political correctness. Policy Options, 65-72. Retrieved from:
  25. Nepstad D. et al. (2014). Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science, 344 (6188): 1118-1123. doi:10.1126/science.1248525
  26. O’Rourke, D. (2005). Market movements: Nongovernmental organization strategies to influence global production and consumption. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1-2): 115-128. doi:10.1162/1088198054084608
  27. Pirard, R. et al. (2015). Zero-deforestation commitments in Indonesia: Governance challenges. CIFOR info brief No. 132. doi:10.17528/cifor/005871
  28. Pye, O. (2013). An analysis of transnational environmental campaigning around palm oil. In Pye, O. and Bhattacharya, J. The palm oil controversy in Southeast Asia: A transnational perspective (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies).
  29. Pye, O. (2010). The biofuel connection – transnational activism and the palm oil boom. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37:4, 851-874. doi:10.1080/03066150.2010.512461
  30. Raitzer, D.A. (2008). Assessing the impact of CIFOR’s influence on policy and practice in the Indonesian pulp and paper sector. Impact Assessment Paper, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. Retrieved from:
  31. Ruddorf, B.F.T. et al. (2011). The soy moratorium in the Amazon Biome monitored by remote sensing images. Remote Sensing. 3:185-202. doi:10.3390/rs3010185
  32. Sonnenfeld, D.A. (2002). Social movements and ecological modernization: The transformation of pulp and paper manufacturing. Development and Change, 33(1):1-27. doi:33:1-27. 10.1111/1467-7660.00238
  33. Walker, N. et al. (2013). Demand-side interventions to reduce deforestation and forest degradation, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). Retrieved from:
  34. Zhouri, A. (2000). Transnational campaigns for the Amazon: NGO strategies, trade and official responses. Ambiente & Sociedade, Ano III (No 6/7):31-63. doi:10.1590/S1414-753X2000000100003