Site icon Conservation news

The next best thing: how well do secondary forests preserve biodiversity?

Secondary forests, which are areas that were previously cleared of old-growth cover, now comprise the majority of the forested areas in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere. A heavily debated issue is to what extent secondary forests are able to contribute to the preservation of biodiversity. In an article published in PLOS ONE, a group of researchers from the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute led by Michiel van Breugel evaluated the biodiversity preservation potential of secondary forests. However, while they found that secondary forests can provide suitable homes for broad arrays of species, the true biodiversity potential of these forests is often limited by cycles of reclearing.



According to the researchers, in tropical regions like Panama’s Agua Salud, where the study was conducted, young secondary forests comprise more land area than do mature forests. Their study examined patterns of how plant species and plant diversity are established over time, both within small areas called “patches” as well as across the larger scale of landscapes. This allowed for a comparison between the processes occurring at both levels.





Agua Salud landscape, with a recently slashed and burned secondary forest on the foreground. The forest patch was about 15 years old. Not the best photo, but very relevant with regard to the paper! Author: Jake SlusserAgua Salud landscape, with a recently slashed and burned secondary forest on the foreground. The forest patch was about 15 years old. Author: Jake Slusser



This capacity to compare across areas of varying size and ages was a plus given, “local niche-based processes do not predict landscape scale patterns of diversity and composition nor how these change during succession,” states the study.



The Agua Salud Project is located in the watershed of the Panama Canal. Twenty-three years ago, when the project was established, its purpose was to quantify what the forests in the canal’s watershed provided ecologically, socially, and economically. At that time, deforestation was compromising the canal’s use by contributing to erosion and flooding. Now, the Panamanian government has outlawed deforestation in much of the watershed area. Agua Salud comprises a patchwork of various land uses, which allows for the study and comparison of mature forest remnants, crop land, pastures, and secondary forests of different ages.




Sapling / regeneration of canopy tree (Xylopia frutenscens)  in understory of few years old secondary forest. Photo: Michiel van Breugel
Sapling / regeneration of canopy tree (Xylopia frutenscens) in understory of few years old secondary forest. Photo: Michiel van Breugel


On the 45 randomly chosen plots aged two to 32 years of age, the researchers counted seedlings, saplings, juveniles, and adult trees along with the number of shrubs, trees, lianas, and palms. After some heavy number crunching, they were able to determine what species predominated in plots cleared within the past seven years (i.e., two to seven years), and what species composition looked like for plots that had been re-establishing themselves for a longer period of time (i.e., 18 to 32 years). They also examined abilities of individual species to reproduce within a plot.



The researchers found that the process of succession follows a predictable course, starting with small, quickly growing species and ending with those that take longer to become established. Diversity also increases with time.




Agua Salud landscape. Photo printed under a CC BY license with permission from Christian Ziegler.
Agua Salud landscape. Photo printed under a CC BY license with permission from Christian Ziegler.


“The first group of species consists mostly of small seeded, well dispersed (by wind, bats, birds) small tree and shrub species that grow very fast once established, reproduce within a few years and have a short life span,” van Breugel told mongabay.com. “The second group of species is much more diverse. It may take them more time to arrive at different sites because they are less efficiently dispersed, depend for their dispersal on animal species that are more forest bound. They may also grow slower and therefore it may take them longer to grow.”



Findings also indicated that while secondary forests are capable of having high biodiversity, the typical re-clearing cycle of less than 32 years limits their capacity. Many species can not become fully established as a result of secondary forests’ continuous use, affecting the abilities of secondary forests to preserve surrounding mature forests species diversity and composition.




Understory of older secondary forest (></img>50y), an educational plot of ELTI (Environmental leadership and Trainings Initiative, which is a collaboration between Yale and STRI), with colors indicating successional status of trees” ><br></br><i>Understory of older secondary forest (>50y), an educational plot of ELTI (Environmental leadership and Trainings Initiative, which is a collaboration between Yale and STRI), with colors indicating successional status of trees. Photo by Michiel van Breugel.</i><br></br>
<BR><BR></p>
<p>In the article, the authors were hesitant to identify outright what might be possible if humans implemented land-use practices to encourage maturation of species diversity and composition, in addition to allowing secondary forests more time to re-establish themselves.  However, when questioned further about the implications of their results, van Breugel stated “land use and management practices that maintain increasingly diverse seed sources (i.e., more reproductive trees of more species), that create, improves or preserves better and more connectivity and habitat for a more diverse group of dispersers and pollinators, and that includes longer fallow periods, may certainly result in better prospects of biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes and in the secondary forests within those landscapes.”<br></br>
<BR><BR><br></br>
Robin Chazdon, professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of Connecticut, has been studying secondary forests in northeastern Costa Rica for more than 20 years. She shared concerns about the hesitancy of the authors’ findings, stating that this could lead to an under-valuing of secondary forests. She also explained that a patch of old-growth forest could easily become isolated if it’s unable to disperse plant species past its boundaries.<br></br>
<BR><BR><br></br>
“Young second-growth forests do not replace old-growth forest. This is not a new finding,” said Chazdon. “The continued development of second-growth forests depends on continuous input of seeds from nearby old-growth forest patches. I prefer to think about this issue in terms of how second-growth forests can complement and buffer biodiversity conservation at the landscape level.”<br></br>
<BR><BR><br></br>
“During succession, reaching reproductive size can take many decades or even centuries for slow-growing canopy tree species present in old-growth forests,” she continued. “But the study makes clear that diverse tree species are present at smaller size classes and it is likely that more species will establish and recruit over time as long as forest areas remain in the landscape.”<br></br>
<BR><BR><br></br>
<img src=https://mongabay-images.s3.amazonaws.com/14/0116Mongabay_6.jpg width=600 alt=
Canopy of ~10 year old secondary forest in Agua Salud. Photo by Michiel van Breugel.



At Agua Salud. no imminent threat of deforestation exists. This has made it possible for research to be directed towards how to build a forest and allows for the analysis of how plant species thrive across patches of various ages, light, soil composition, and plant species. Chazdon emphasized how unique this is.



“In the context of the Agua Salud landscape, second-growth forests in this region are clearly following a successional trajectory towards convergence of species composition with old-growth forests,” she said. “They are not impoverished in any way, and as far as I know they are not in imminent danger of being cleared. They are undergoing succession and are not fully formed after 32 years. Yes, they have limited tree biodiversity in their current state. Yes, if all of the old-growth forest in this region were cleared and only these young second-growth stands remained, the landscape would indeed become very impoverished. But it does not follow that the value of these forests should be discounted because the tree species in them are not yet reproductively mature, especially if old-growth trees are establishing as seedlings and saplings. This is good news, not bad news!”



Just 21 percent of the world’s old-growth forests remain, and every minute, the equivalent of thirty-six football fields are lost. If the prospect of establishing secondary forests could be viewed as a solution for re-establishing old-growth forests, wouldn’t the world breathe a bit easier?



Citations:









Related articles


Tree islands more effective way to replant the world’s forests

(01/09/2014) Worldwide, large swaths of land lay barren in the wake of agricultural expansion, and as global forest cover continues to decline, carbon and water cycles, biodiversity, and human health are impacted. But efforts to restore abandoned pastures and agricultural plots back into functioning forest ecosystems are often hindered by high costs and time requirements. Fortunately, scientists have developed a new method for a more cost effective solution to forest restoration, the establishment of ‘tree islands.’

Still hope for tropical biodiversity in human modified landscapes

(04/09/2013) As primary forests become increasingly rare and expensive to protect, many ecologists are looking to better management of Human Modified Landscapes (HMLs) to shepherd and shield biodiversity in the tropics. Secondary forests, selectively logged forests and lands devoted to sustainable agriculture already play an important role in conservation efforts. However, the idea that HMLs will serve as a “Noah’s Ark” for biodiversity, is controversial.

Rodents have lowest diversity in primary forests in the Congo

(09/17/2012) For many animal families, diversity and abundance rises as one moves away from human-impacted landscapes, like agricultural areas, into untouched places, such as primary rainforests. However, a new study in mongabay.com’s open access journal Tropical Conservation Science, shows that the inverse can also be true. In this case, scientists working in the Democratic Republic of Congo’s (DRC) Maskao Forest found that both rodent diversity and abundance was lowest in primary forest.

Exit mobile version