Site icon Conservation news

New measure of wealth accounts for resource depletion, environmental damage




New measure of wealth accounts for resource depletion, environmental damage

New measure of wealth accounts for resource depletion, environmental damage
Modified World Bank Press Release
September 18, 2005

Accounting for the actual value of natural resources, including resource depletion and population growth, shows that net savings per person are negative in the world’s most impoverished countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, according to a new World Bank publication, Where is the Wealth of Nations?, launched on the eve of the 2005 U.N. World Summit.


Current indicators used to guide development decisions – national accounts figures, such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP) – ignore depletion of resources and damage to the environment. In the Conference Edition of Where is the Wealth of Nations?, the World Bank offers new estimates of total wealth, including produced capital, natural resources, and the value of human skills and capabilities, which show that many of the poorest countries in the world are not on a sustainable path.



“New measures of wealth make the social and environmental costs of development decisions visible that are not captured by traditional economics, and thereby allow us to improve actions and policies for sustainable development. Including the value of natural resources and our social capital in national accounting is a vital step to achieve economic growth that is equitable and sustainable,” said Achim Steiner, Director General of the World Conservation Union (IUCN).



The publication offers a ranking of countries according to total wealth, with tables highlighting the 10 wealthiest and the 10 poorest countries (see Annex). Switzerland heads the list of the top-ten performers, the other nine being European countries, the United States, and Japan. Sub-Saharan Africa dominates the bottom-10 list, with Ethiopia having the lowest level of total wealth.


“If a household is running down its bank account from month to month, or having to sell assets such as vehicles or livestock in order to keep food on the table, then we would conclude that this household is not sustainable,” explains Kirk Hamilton, Lead Environmental Economist, Environment Department, and the main author of the book. “The same applies to nations as a whole – if their net saving rate is negative then this is a signal that national wealth is being run down and the development path is not sustainable.”



The companion booklet, Ensuring Environmental Sustainability, however, highlights that there are important exceptions – Mauritania has improved its development prospects through better management of fishery resources, while Botswana has successfully used diamond resources to finance the schooling, health care, and infrastructure which have supported its high rate of growth.



In the case of Botswana, the government makes specific provision in its budget to ensure that mineral revenues are invested rather than consumed through government expenditures. It also maintains a large mineral revenue fund which can both finance future investments and buffer the government budget from swings in diamond prices. This sound combination of macroeconomic and natural resource management has permitted Botswana to avoid the ‘resource curse’ that has afflicted many oil producers.



“Every day, decision makers in developing countries are faced with difficult choices regarding the exploitation of natural resources and the environmental impacts of development programs and policies,” said Ian Johnson, World Bank Vice President for Sustainable Development. “But the tools currently being used are leaving out the natural resources stocks and intangible capital such as knowledge and skills. Sound management of ecosystems is key to a responsible path to growth. This publication challenges common assumptions about how nations generate their wealth.”



With this publication, the World Bank releases what could be termed the ‘millennium capital assessment’, or monetary estimates of the range of resources – produced, ecosystems, and intangible – upon which development depends. This comprehensive snapshot of wealth for 120 countries at the turn of the millennium aims to deepen the understanding of the linkages between the ability of a country to develop and the level and composition of wealth.



According to Where is the Wealth of Nations?, natural wealth – the value of minerals, energy, forests, cropland, pastureland, and protected areas – is actually a much higher share of total wealth in low-income countries than produced capital, 26 percent compared with 16 percent.



“Where is the Wealth of Nations further substantiates the realization,” said Steve McCormick, President and CEO, The Nature Conservancy, “that if we can’t get a handle on the deconstruction of natural systems, then we will seriously jeopardize our efforts to make lasting, substantial progress on improving the standard of living of the world’s poorest people. Put simply, healthy ecosystems are the foundation of healthy economies.”



The 7th Millennium Development Goal (MDG) – ensure environmental sustainability – calls on countries to “reverse the losses of environmental resources” by 2015. Achieving this goal has proven to be elusive for most countries, not least because of a lack of indicators of sustainable development.






“There is a shared sense of urgency about meeting the MDGs,” added Warren Evans, Director of Environment, World Bank, “however, it would be tragic if the achievements of 2015 are not sustained because soils have been mined and fisheries and forests depleted. Avoiding this outcome is the true seventh Millennium Development Goal.”



Measuring the change in total wealth and the change in natural wealth can contribute to a comprehensive measure of whether a development path is sustainable in the long term. The indicators in Where is the Wealth of Nations can guide countries toward a sustainable path.

Summary data from selected appendices in Where is the Wealth of Nations?, a report from the World Bank

More data is available at www.worldbank.org/sustainabledevelopment and more detailed tables can be found at:

Country gross national income US$ per capita Total wealth US$ per capita Adjusted net saving per capita Change in wealth per capita
Albania 1220 17312 145 122
Algeria 1670 18491 -93 -409
Antigua and Barbuda 8700 131849 911 94
Argentina 7718 139232 154 -109
Australia 19703 371031 963 46
Austria 23403 493080 3032 2831
Bangladesh 373 6000 71 41
Barbados 9344 146737 588 520
Belgium-Luxembourg 21756 451714 2811 2649
Belize 3230 52935 303 -150
Benin 360 7895 14 -42
Bhutan 532 7747 111 -111
Bolivia 969 18141 9 -127
Botswana 2925 40592 1021 814
Brazil 3432 86922 265 64
Bulgaria 1504 25256 80 238
Burkina Faso 230 5087 15 -36
Burundi 97 2859 -10 -37
Cameroon 548 10753 -8 -152
Canada 22612 324979 3006 2221
Cape Verde 1195 32942 43 -81
Chad 174 4458 -8 -74
Chile 4779 77726 406 129
China 844 9387 236 200
Colombia 1926 44660 -6 -205
Comoros 367 8030 -17 -73
Congo, Rep. of 660 3516 -227 -727
Costa Rica 3857 61611 464 107
Cote d’Ivoire 625 14243 -5 -100
Denmark 29009 575138 4376 4014
Dominica 3344 59084 -53 7
Dominican Republic 2234 33410 341 198
Ecuador 1170 33745 -51 -293
Egypt 1569 21879 91 -45
El Salvador 2075 36476 113 37
Estonia 3836 66769 570 681
Ethiopia 101 1965 -4 -27
Fiji 2055 44880 -23 -109
Finland 22893 419346 4334 4236
France 22399 468024 3249 2951
Gabon 3370 43168 -1183 -2241
Gambia, The 305 6365 -5 -45
Georgia 601 13036 4 16
Germany 22641 496447 2180 2071
Ghana 255 10365 16 -18
Greece 10706 236972 1431 1327
Grenada 3671 55312 650 533
Guatemala 1676 30480 37 -123
Guinea-Bissau 870 3974 -49 -108
Guyana 15810
Haiti 503 8235 133 106
Honduras 897 11567 213 53
Hungary 4370 77072 676 765
India 446 6820 67 16
Indonesia 675 13869 20 -56
Iran 1580 24023 -142 -398
Ireland 21495 330490 4964 4199
Israel 17354 294723 1540 268
Italy 18478 372666 1990 1947
Jamaica 2954 47796 471 371
Japan 37879 493241 5906 5643
Jordan 1727 31546 236 28
Kenya 343 6609 40 -11
Korea, Rep. of 10843 141282 2694 2415
Latvia 3271 47198 412 551
Lesotho 15477
Madagascar 245 5020 9 -56
Malawi 162 5200 -2 -29
Malaysia 3554 46687 767 227
Mali 221 5241 20 -47
Mauritania 382 7959 -30 -147
Mauritius 3697 60284 645 514
Mexico 5783 61872 545 155
Moldova 316 8771 38 56
Morocco 1131 22965 200 117
Mozambique 195 4232 15 -20
Namibia 1820 36907 392 140
Nepal 239 3802 46 2
Netherlands 23382 421389 3673 3176
New Zealand 12679 242934 1550 1082
Nicaragua 739 13214 81 -18
Niger 166 3695 -10 -83
Nigeria 297 2748 -97 -210
Norway 36800 473708 6916 5708
Pakistan 517 7871 54 -2
Panama 3857 57663 829 585
Paraguay 1465 35600 131 -93
Peru 1991 39046 148 15
Philippines 1033 19351 211 114
Portugal 10256 207477 943 750
Romania 1639 29113 80 89
Russian Federation 1738 38709 -164 4
Rwanda 233 5670 14 -60
Senegal 449 10167 31 -27
Seychelles 7089 125572 1162 904
Singapore 22968 252607 8258 6949
South Africa 2837 59629 246 -2
Spain 13723 261205 1987 1663
Sri Lanka 868 14731 166 116
St. Kitts and Nevis 6746 100167 1612 -63
St. Lucia 4103 66199 507 253
St. Vincent 2824 49232 365 336
Suriname 47128
Swaziland 1375 27739 129 8
Sweden 26809 513424 4278 4191
Switzerland 37165 648241 8611 8020
Syrian Arab Rep. 1064 10419 -175 -473
Thailand 1989 35854 351 259
Togo 285 7109 -20 -88
Trinidad and Tobago 5838 57549 -541 -774
Tunisia 1936 36537 291 176
Turkey 2980 47859 476 273
United Kingdom 24606 408753 1882 1725
United States 35188 512612 3092 2020
Uruguay 5962 118463 137 20
Venezuela 4970 45196 -94 -847
Zambia 312 6564 -13 -63
Zimbabwe 550 9612 53 -4


The figures and text above are copyright the World Bank. Further information, along with the full report in PDF form, is available at www.worldbank.org/sustainabledevelopment

Exit mobile version