Site icon Conservation news

Saving the Amazonian Rainforest Through Agricultural Certification

Saving the Amazon Rainforest Through Agricultural Certification

Saving the Amazon Rainforest Through Agricultural Certification
New Certification Scheme for Cattle, Soy
Tina Butler,
June 3, 2005

John Cain Carter is a Texan rancher who owns 20,000 acres (8100 hectares) in the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso and who has an unlikely relationship with the forest and its protectors. He believes that landowners, despite being held in low regard by environmentalists as the production of Brazilian beef and soya is currently the main threat to the rainforest in this region, may be the potential saviors of the rainforest. Carter, among other somewhat environmentally-conscious, yet profit-oriented landowners, wants to promote responsible agricultural practices by encouraging consumers to provide incentives to growers and producers.

Related articles on the Amazon:

Paving of road brings change in the Amazon rainforest – 27-May-2005
Two articles on the effects of the BR163 highway from the AP.

Second “uncontacted” tribe in Amazon rain forest threatened by loggers – 27-May-2005
A Brazilian Indian tribe armed with bows and arrows and unseen for years has been spotted in a remote Amazon region where clashes with illegal loggers are threatening its existence.

Prize recognizes largest contributor to Amazon rainforest destruction – 27-May-2005
The environmental group Greenpeace nominated President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and five others for its first “Golden Chainsaw” prize — to be awarded to the Brazilian deemed to have contributed most to the Amazon’s destruction.

Green party quits government to protest Amazon deforestation – 24-May-2005
According to a report from Reuters, legislators for Brazil’s Green Party have quit the government in protest of its failure to slow deforestation in the Amazon.

Rainforest loss in the Amazon tops 200,000 square miles, new figures from Brazilian government – 20-May-2005
New figures from the Brazilian government show that 10,088 square miles of rain forest were destroyed in the 12 months ending in August 2004. Deforestation in the Amazon in 2004 was the second worst ever as rain forest was cleared for cattle ranches and soy farms.

Farming the world’s largest fish – an alternative to deforestation – 19-May-2005
Integrated aquaculture offers great potential for sustainable poverty allievation in the Amazon region. It reduces the need to clear land for subsistence agriculture while generating significant economic and nutritional benefits for poor Amazonian colonists.

Drought, fire called biggest threats to Amazon rainforest ecosystem – 23-April-2005
A prolonged drought in the Amazon could lead to a massive die-off in the world’s largest rainforest according to a study released in Science last week.

Farmers and landless poor battle over the Amazon – 22-April-2005
Land battles in Brazil’s countryside reached the highest level in at least 20 years in 2004 as activists clashed with farmers and loggers advancing on savanna and Amazon rain forest, a nongovernmental group said Tuesday.

Are rainforests still worth saving? – 20-April-2005
Rainforests around the world still continue to fall. Does it really make a difference?

Another look at global rainforest conservation – 19-April-2005
With Earth Day approaching it is appropriate to take another look at conservation efforts in the world’s tropical rainforests, which today are disappearing from the face of the globe. Despite growing international concern, rainforests continue to be destroyed at a pace exceeding 80,000 acres (32,000 hectares) per day. So, what should be done?

Chinese economy drives road-building and deforestation in the Amazon – 19-April-2005
Paving the Amazon rainforest to bring soybeans to China.

In the past year, over 10,000 square miles (26,130 kilometers) of rainforest were destroyed in Brazil, the second highest level of deforestation on record. The clearing was performed mainly in anticipation of ranchers and farmers coming to the region. Supposedly, laws restrict deforestation to only 20 percent of privately-owned rainforest land, while a network of preserves protects some public land, but in practice, this is not usually followed or enforced.

Some environmental groups have opted to cooperate with landowners rather than continue to fight a losing battle. This type of cooperation originated with the logging industry, where furniture makers buying sustainably-harvested wood could hawk their environmentally friendly products to green consumers. Select ranchers are now working to adapt this approach to the agricultural industry which does even more harm to the rainforest than plain logging. One environmental group, the Nature Conservancy, announced an agreement where Cargill, a large agriculture company in the United States, will buy soya only from farmers who obey the Brazilian conservation laws or those working towards compliance.

Mr. Carter is backing a new NGO called the Alianca da Terra, which hopes to provide a link between producers and environmentalists by promoting standards of responsible practice that appease both sides. Ranching is considered to be an even bigger threat to the forests than soya production. Worldwide concerns about hoof and mouth disease among other cattle-based ills is already propelling Brazilian producers towards certification. Should the Alianca da Terra succeed in its mission, all Brazilian agricultural products will carry a seal that reflects health, environmental and social standards.

Some question whether agricultural certification will actually change illegal practices, as problems with logging persist. With agriculture, the adoption and enforcement of certification is likely to be even more difficult, as Brazil is the largest buyer of beef and China is the largest market for soya and has shown no qualms about environmentally unsound practices. The success of the certification program hinges on reaching a consensus between agricultural producers and consumers. Resolution seems difficult as landowners want the 20 percent limit on private land to be raised and environmentalists naturally want this number lowered. Mr. Carter argues that even with increases in logging, much of the forest will still be preserved, but without cooperation from landowners, conservationists will see everything lost.

Exit mobile version