March 05, 2013
Deforestation in Borneo. Photo by: Rhett A. Butler.
"When others have said that a planetary critical transition is possible/likely, they've done so without any underlying model (or past/present examples, apart from catastrophic drivers like asteroid strikes)," lead author Barry Brook and Director of Climate Science at the University of Adelaide told mongabay.com. "It’s just speculation and we’ve argued [...] that this conjecture is not logically grounded. No one has found the opposite of what we suggested—they’ve just proposed it."
According to Brook and his team, a truly global tipping point must include an impact large enough to spread across the entire world, hitting various continents, in addition to causing some uniform response.
Brain coral. Photo by: Rhett A. Butler.
The idea of such a tipping point comes from ecological research, which has shown that some ecosystems will flip to a new state after becoming heavily degraded. But Brook and his team say that tipping points in individual ecosystems should not be conflated with impacts across the Earth as a whole.
Even climate change, which some scientists might consider the ultimate tipping point, does not fit the bill, according to the paper. Impacts from climate change, while global, will not be uniform and hence not a "tipping point" as such.
"Local and regional ecosystems vary considerably in their responses to climate change, and their regime shifts are therefore likely to vary considerably across the terrestrial biosphere," the authors write.
Barry adds that, "from a planetary perspective, this diversity in ecosystem responses creates an essentially gradual pattern of change, without any identifiable tipping points."
The paper further argues that biodiversity loss on land may not have the large-scale impacts that some ecologists argue, since invasive species could potentially take the role of vanishing ones.
"So we can lose the unique evolutionary history (bad, from an intrinsic viewpoint) but not necessarily the role they impart in terms of ecosystem stability or provision of services," explains Brook. The controversial argument goes against many scientists' view that decreased biodiversity will ultimately lessen ecological services, such as pollination, water purification, and carbon sequestration.
Of course, ecologists still know little about the many ecological roles single species may play, and some research has shown that losing even one key species can have a major impact. For example, top predators like wolves and sharks appear to play an oversized role in maintaining an ecosystem's biodiversity and services. Other studies have certain plants have evolved to be dispersed only by big herbivores, like rhinos and elephants. There are unlikely to be any replacement for elephants anytime soon
Despite arguing that global tipping points are unlikely, there is one current environmental issue that may fit the definition of an Earth-wide tipping point, only it would occur across the oceans not land: ocean acidification.
"Coral reef ecosystems appear to have disappeared globally, simultaneously, and suddenly at the Triassic–Jurassic transition, likely driven by global increases in ocean acidity and temperature in response to massive geological CO2 release to the atmosphere," the scientists write.
Although less widely known than climate change, ocean acidification is also caused by rising carbon dioxide emissions, some of which are sequestered by the world’s oceans. Carbon dioxide changes the chemistry of oceans, reducing pH levels and imperiling the world's coral reefs, along with crustaceans, mollusks, and even some plankton. The loss of such biodiversity could trigger a mass extinction event across marine ecosystems.
Still, Brook and his colleagues contend that a sudden focus on global tipping points is not only bad science, but unhelpful.
"We argue that it distracts from the huge ecological transformations that have already occurred, and runs the risk of leading to unjustified fatalism about catastrophic or irrevocable effects caused by tipping points," says Brook. "We think the focus should be on working out how to harmonize human aspiration with conservation goals, rather trying to avoid the unavoidable or see planetary management as 'us' (humans and their domesticated species) vs. 'them' (the rest of the biosphere)."
CITATION: Brook, B. W.; Ellis, E. C.; Perring, M. P.; Mackay, A. W. & Blomqvist, L. Does the terrestrial biosphere have planetary tipping points? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2013.
Scientists: stop treating population growth as a 'given' and empower women
(02/27/2013) Climate change, biodiversity loss, resource depletion, water scarcity, and land issues: almost all of the world's environmental problems are underpinned by too many people inhabiting a finite planet. A new study in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B warns that overpopulation—combined with over-consumption—is threatening to push the entire globe into "a collapse of global civilization." But cultural changes, especially more empowerment of women and access to contraceptives, may hold the key to reducing population growth and eventual sustainability.
Paradigm shift needed to avert global environmental collapse, according to author of new book The Blueprint: Averting Global Collapse
(01/10/2013) Global strategist, trained educator, and international lecturer Daniel Rirdan set out to create a plan addressing the future of our planet. His book The Blueprint: Averting Global Collapse, published this year, does just that. "It has been a sixty hour a week routine," Rirdan told mongabay.com in a recent interview. "Basically, I would wake up with the burden of the world on my shoulders and go to sleep with it. It went on like this for eighteen months." It becomes apparent when reading The Blueprint that it was indeed a monumental undertaking.
Animals dissolving due to carbon emissions
(12/03/2012) Marine snails, also known as sea butterflies, are dissolving in the Southern Seas due to anthropogenic carbon emissions, according to a new study in Nature GeoScience. Scientists have discovered that the snail's shells are being corroded away as pH levels in the ocean drop due to carbon emissions, a phenomenon known as ocean acidification. The snails in question, Limacina helicina antarctica, play a vital role in the food chain, as prey for plankton, fish, birds, and even whales.
'No-one is listening to the entire scientific community': global carbon emissions set to hit new high
(12/03/2012) Global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from industrial sources are set to hit a new record high this year according to a new analysis by Global Carbon Project. The analysis in Nature Climate Changes predicts that CO2 emissions will rise another 2.6 percent, hitting 35.6 billion tonnes. The scientists warn that such steep climbs in global emissions year-after-year means that the door is rapidly closing on a global agreement to keep temperatures from rising 2 degree Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels.
World Bank: 4 degrees Celsius warming would be miserable
(11/20/2012) A new report by the World Bank paints a bleak picture of life on Earth in 80 years: global temperatures have risen by 4 degrees Celsius spurring rapidly rising sea levels and devastating droughts. Global agriculture is under constant threat; economies have been hampered; coastal cities are repeatedly flooded; coral reefs are dissolving from ocean acidification; and species worldwide are vanishing. This, according to the World Bank, is where we are headed even if all of the world's nations meet their pledges on cutting greenhouse gas emissions. However, the report also notes that with swift, aggressive action it's still possible to ensure that global temperatures don't rise above 4 degrees Celsius.