SHARE:
submit to reddit
print



Rich countries buy up agricultural land in poor countries
Jeremy Hance
mongabay.com
May 26, 2009




Over two-and-half million hectares in the Democratic Republic of the Congo; half a million hectares in Tanzania; and a quarter of a million hectares in Libya: these figures represent just some of the recent international land deals where wealthy countries buy up land in poorer nations for food, and sometimes biofuel, production. The controversial trend has sparked a recent report from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) highlighting what nations have to gain—and lose—from participating in such deals.

Spurred on by the global food crisis, nations in the Middle-east and Asia have begun purchasing agricultural land abroad in order to make-up for a lack of arable land at home. Due to water shortages across the region, Middle-eastern nations like Qatar, Jordan, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia have turned largely to Africa for thousands upon thousands of hectares of land, while massive populations and dwindling land has led India, South Korea, and China to also buy up farmland overseas.



Land buyers and sellers. Click to enlarge.
According to IFPRI it was the food crisis, along with “increased pressures on natural resources, water scarcity, export restrictions imposed by major producers when food prices were high, and growing distrust in the functioning of regional and global markets”, which pressed these nations into seeking deals abroad that are unique in history for the size of land purchased or leased.

IFPRI’s report, compiled by director general of IFPRI, Joachim von Braun, and senior research fellow in the Environment and Production Technology Division of IFPRI, Ruth Meinzen-Dick, sees the trend as positive to the extent in which it provides investment, technology, and education to poor nations, many of which have fallen behind in food production compared to industrial nations. The report also lists “the creation of a potentially significant number of farm and off-farm jobs, development of rural infrastructure, and poverty-reducing improvements such as construction of schools and health posts” as possible positive outcomes stemming from such deals.

So, why has the reaction from local people and media has been cautious to downright hostile?

Several deals have fallen through due to local uneasiness. Both the Philippines and the Mozambique have dropped Chinese land-deals, while a deal in Madagascar to provide South Korea with 1.3 million hectares has been linked to the coup which overthrew former president, Marc Ravalomanana. Local people often view such deals as threatening their livelihood, and not without reason. Environmentalists worry that wealthy nations are devastating poorer nations’ forests and natural resources for unending plantations or unsustainable farm systems.


View “Land Grabbing” by Foreign Investors in Developing Countries in a larger map

In its report IFPRI points out that many of these deals could be bad for local farmers unless the agreements include specific provisions to protect them. On the largeness of the international stage, local landowners in poor countries have little power to negotiate fair terms for being displaced from their land to make room for foreign farmers. In addition, the report’s authors note that "this inequality in bargaining power is exacerbated when the smallholders whose land is being acquired for foreign investment projects have no formal title to the land, but have been using it under customary tenure arrangements." Such a situation makes it possible for local governments, who technically own the land, to simply push people off land without compensation. The report warns that these deals could lead to political turmoil, even violent uprisings, as illustrated in Madagascar.

Last year, in the midst of many agreements, the director general of the UN’s Food and Agricultural organization, Jacques Diouf, warned that “the risk [of these deals] is of creating a neo-colonial pact for the provision of non-value-added raw materials in the producing countries and unacceptable work conditions for agricultural workers.” Media sources worldwide jumped on the term ‘neo-colonial,’ interpreting such agreements as a new trend by the wealthy and powerful to subject the weak and their resources.

Consequences of such deals are not just social: environmental problems that come with these deals could devastate local resources and ecosystems, further impoverishing local people.

IFPRI points out that “introducing intensive agricultural production can threaten biodiversity, carbon stocks, and land and water resources”, for example “converting forests or rangelands to monocropping reduces diversity in flora, fauna, and agrobiodiversity, as well as aboveground and subsurface carbon stocks.” The report warns that while irrigation, fertilization, and pesticides may help increase yields, they could also lead to long-term problems with salinity, erosion, and pollution.

Despite the importance of environmental issues over the long-term, such issues are less likely to thwart an agreement than social unrest.

The report further warns that there is a disquieting lack of transparency in many of these agreements: “the status of the deals, the size of land purchased or leased, and the amount invested are often still murky. Well-documented examples are scarce, and some reports are contradictory.” The IFPRI recommends increased transparency to make certain that deals are positive for all parties involved.



Last year Madagascar offered up half its arable land — for free %#8212; to a South Korean corporation. 50 percent of children in Madagascar "suffer retarded growth due to a chronically inadequate diet," according to the World Food Programme.
The report also makes other recommendations including implementing projects that do not evict local farmers, but instead contracting these often poor farmers to sell their goods to the foreign nation in exchange for additional credit, support, and technology. In addition, careful environmental studies should be conducted before any agreement is made, and environmental monitoring should continue after the agreement is enacted. Finally, the report recommends that all agreements should adhere to the rule that in the midst of a national food crisis, agricultural products should go to the local population and not be sent abroad.

Despite such recommendations from IFPRI and international concern (and condemnation), few agreements, if any, have been so progressive. The victims are often the poorest of the poor and already degraded ecosystems. Only the future will tell if nations, both on the buying end and the selling, will learn from Madagascar’s example by proceeding cautiously and openly: land remains a potent catalyst for social unrest and political upheaval.

Policy Brief No. 13 “Land Grabbing” by Foreign Investors in Developing Countries - Risks and Opportunities Joachim von Braun and Ruth Meinzen-Dick. April 2009





Related articles

Republic of Congo to turn over 25 M acres of land to South African farmers

(04/20/2009) The government of Republic of Congo (Brazzaville) has offered 25 million acres (10 million hectares) of land to South African farmers in an effort to improve the central African nation's food security, reports Reuters. The area is nearly twice the amount of arable land in South Africa.


Political violence in Madagascar may lead Daewoo to abandon controversial farm project

(02/10/2009) Political instability and low commodity prices may lead South Korea's Daewoo Logistics to delay or pull out of a controversial agricultural project in Madagascar, reports Reuters.


Malaysia targets Africa and the Amazon for oil palm expansion

(08/25/2008) Facing land scarcity at home and environmental complaints, Malaysian palm oil producers should look overseas to expand operations, a high-ranking Malaysian agricultural minister said Monday.




SHARE THIS ARTICLE:
print


Tags:
food food crisis agriculture farming china china's demand for resources India south korea middle east democratic republic of congo madagascar biodiesel biodiversity climate change corruption dr congo economics environmental economics environmental politics green environment politics poverty poverty alleviation population sustainability sustainable development water vietnam

CITATION:
Jeremy Hance
mongabay.com (May 26, 2009). Rich countries buy up agricultural land in poor countries. http://news.mongabay.com/2009/0525-hance_landbuys.html



News index | RSS | News Feed | Twitter | Home


Advertisements:


Organic Apparel from Patagonia | Insect-repelling clothing




Mongabay Store
Wildlife of Madagascar T-shirt
Wildlife of Madagascar T-shirt
Bold and Dangerous - Pygmy tyrant t-shirts
Bold and Dangerous - Pygmy tyrant
Love me before I'm gone - Gladiator frog t-shirts
Love me before I'm gone - Gladiator frog
Licking this frog may make you crazy t-shirts
Licking this frog may make you crazy



MONGABAY.COM
Mongabay.com seeks to raise interest in and appreciation of wild lands and wildlife, while examining the impact of emerging trends in climate, technology, economics, and finance on conservation and development (more)

CONTENTS
Rainforests
Tropical Fish
News
Madagascar
Pictures
Kids' Site
Languages
TCS Journal
About
Archives
Topics | RSS
Newsletter



WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
Email:


Climate Change Communicator of the Year 2010

Mongabay has been nominated for Climate Change Communicator of the Year 2010 by George Mason University's Center for Climate Change Communication. Balloting runs through February 15. Be sure to vote!


INTERACT
Facebook
Contact
Twitter
Advertise
Photo Store
Help


SUPPORT
Help support mongabay.com when you buy from Amazon.com



POPULAR PAGES
Rainforests
Rain forests
Amazon deforestation
Deforestation
Deforestation stats
Why rainforests matter
Saving rainforests
Deforestation stats
Rainforest canopy

News
Most popular articles
Worth saving?
Forest conservation
Earth Day
Poverty alleviation
Cell phones in Africa
Seniors helping Africa
Saving orangutans in Borneo
Palm oil
Amazon palm oil
Future of the Amazon
Cane toads
Dubai environment
Investing to save rainforests
Visiting the rainforest
Biomimicry
Defaunation
Blue lizard
Amazon fires
Extinction debate
Extinction crisis
Blackwashing
Industrial deforestation
Save the Amazon
Rainforests & REDD
Brazil's Amazon plan
Malaysian palm oil
Avatar story
New Guinea
Sulawesi
Amazon ranching
Madagascar
Borneo

News topics
Amazon
Biofuels
Brazil
Carbon Finance
Conservation
Climate Change
Deforestation
Energy
Happy-upbeat
Indonesia
Interviews
Oceans
Palm oil
Rainforests
REDD
Solutions
Wildlife
MORE TOPICS



Non-English Sites
Chinese
Farsi
French
German
Greek
Indonesian
Portuguese
Spanish
Other languages
GA_googleFillSlot("news_160x600_btf_right");

Photo sections
Argentina photos
Australia photos
Belize photos
Botswana photos
Brazil photos
Burma photos
Cambodia photos
China photos
Colombia photos
Costa Rica photos
Croatia photos
Deforestation photos
Frog photos
Gabon photos
Grand Canyon photos
Guatemala photos
Honduras photos
Iceland photos
India photos
Indonesia photos
Kenya photos
Laos photos
Lemur photos
Madagascar photos
Malaysia photos
Mexico photos
Monkey photos
New Zealand photos
Panama photos
Peru photos
Rainforest photos
Slovenia photos
Sunset photos
Suriname photos
Tanzania photos
Thailand photos
Uganda photos
United States photos
Venezuela photos





STORE

SHIRTS
HIGH RESOLUTION PHOTOS / PRINTS


CALENDARS
  • Mount Kenya
  • East Africa Safari Wildlife
  • Kenya's Turkana People
  • Peru
  • African Wildlife
  • Alaska
  • China
  • Madagascar Chameleons


    CANVAS BAGS

  • Hallucinogenic frog bag
  • Madagascar wildlife bag








  • Copyright mongabay 2010