Global warming estimates double in severity according to new MIT modeling
Jeremy Hancemongabay.com
May 20, 2009
|
|
The results "unfortunately largely summed up all in the same direction," says Ronald Prinn, the co-director of the Joint Program and director of MIT's Center for Global Change Science. "Overall, they stacked up so they caused more projected global warming."
Each of the 400 runs of the computer simulations incorporated slight variations that scientists selected as having an equal probability of turning out correct based on current data. The Integrated Global Systems Model differs from many other modeling systems since it incorporates data on human-activity—such as economic growth and energy use—as well as analyzing atmospheric, oceanic, and biological systems.
The model estimated that the median rate of surface warming by 2100 is 5.2 degrees, more than doubling the median rate of 2.4 degrees estimated six years ago. This difference is based on a variety of factors, including current economic data which shows a lower probability of society significantly decreasing greenhouse gas emissions than the more optimistic model six years ago.
In addition, the new modeling incorporated new data about cooling in the 20th century due to volcanic activity, occurrences which masked overall warming. The model also takes into account carbon emissions from soot, and, finally, the rate at which oceans are able to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and transfer it to the ocean’s depths has been lowered due to new studies.
Despite the scientists’ gloomy findings, they found that strong policies to cut greenhouse gases proved as effective in curbing global warming as they did in past models.
Without action "there is significantly more risk than we previously estimated," Prinn says. "This increases the urgency for significant policy action. There's no way the world can or should take these risks.”
Prinn notes that computer modeling is always based on current knowledge and so the accuracy of any modeling is dependent on the soundness of the researcher’s available information.
“We do the research, and let the results fall where they may," Prinn explains, "we don't pretend we can do it accurately. Instead, we do these 400 runs and look at the spread of the odds."
According to Prinn, the odds look grim unless societies “start now and steadily transform the global energy system over the coming decades to low or zero greenhouse gas-emitting technologies."
Related articles
Fire contributes 20% of global warming emissions
(04/23/2009) Fire accounts for roughly half of greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and about twenty percent of total emissions from human activities, report researchers writing in the journal Science. The estimates — based on analysis of fire's impact on emissions of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane; albedo or the reflectivity of Earth's surface; and release of aerosols and other particulates — suggest fire plays a major large role in climate than conventionally believed.
Global warming could turn forests from sink to source of carbon emissions
(04/16/2009) Rising temperatures could reverse the role forests play in mitigating climate change, turning them into net sources of greenhouse gases, reports a new assessment by the International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO). The report, titled "Adaptation of Forests and People to Climate Change – A Global Assessment" and authored by 35 forestry scientists, examined the potential impacts of climate change across the world's major forest types as well as the capacity of forest biomes to adapt to climate shifts. Among the conclusions: a 2.5-degree-C rise in temperatures would eliminate the net carbon sequestering function of global forests. Presently forests worldwide capture about a quarter of carbon emissions.
Cutting greenhouse gases now would save world from worst global warming scenarios
(04/14/2009) If nations worked together to produce large cuts in greenhouse gases, the world would be saved from global warming's worst-case-scenarios, according to a new study from the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). The study found that, although temperatures are set to rise this century, cutting greenhouse gases by 70 percent the globe could avoid the most dangerous aspects of climate change, including a drastic rise in sea level, melting of the Arctic sea ice, and large-scale changes in precipitation. In addition such cuts would eventually allow the climate to stabilize by the end of the century rather than a continuous rise in temperatures.
