EU Environment Commissioner Dimas to transform global car market by setting mandatory emissions and efficiency standards
EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas, the world's most powerful environment minister, has given a first hint at how the EU's recently announced ambitious new energy and climate change policy will play out in the future of mobility: the European Union will set stringent mandatory emissions and efficiency standards for all cars and vehicles sold within the common market. Despite car manufacturers' rush to green marketing, they are coming nowhere near the targets they promised to reach under a 10-year voluntary agreement with the EU. Now legislation will force them to.
The EU's transformative power
The consequences of mandatory targets within the EU would be world changing, because they would push all manufacturers who want to sell cars in the world's largest consumer market to produce greener, cleaner and more efficient vehicles. And once they have developed models that conform to the stringent EU standards, there is no reason not to sell them outside of the Union as well. This is the power of the EU at work on a global scale.
The logic behind this global leverage is elegant in its simplicity: everyone wants to sell in the EU, a market of half a billion wealthy consumers. But you can only do so by obeying the bloc's avant-garde rules. And in order to obey these rules, you have to invest knowledge and capital to develop compliant products. Those who manufacture to compliance best and fastest, can capture most market share. And thus a chain of global competition erupts, that transforms entire world markets. The European REACH legislation on chemical substances in consumer products is showing the effectiveness of this strategy very clearly.
Beyond voluntary agreements
Environment Commissioner Dimas knows that he is extremely powerful and that he can use the same mechanism to change the future of the automobile. The Community Strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and improve fuel economy is based on three pillars, namely commitments of the automobile industry to fuel-economy improvements, the labelling of new cars, and the promotion of fuel efficiency through fiscal measures. Since CO2 emissions are linked to fuel consumption, a car that emits less CO2 will consume less fuel, and hence have smaller running costs.
Up till now, the first pillar consisted of a voluntary agreement with motor manufacturers - but they have infuriated the commission by missing their target by almost 50%. This is why Dimas wants to make the objectives mandatory. The EU's emissions target is 120g CO2/km, which corresponds to 4.5l/100km for diesel cars, and 5l/100km for petrol cars.
That would mean a 1.6 litre petrol Ford Focus would need to cut emissions by a third to qualify as an average vehicle under the new regime. Car manufacturers will be able to average out their overall CO2 targets over their entire range of vehicles. But it is clear that heavyweight, polluting cars like Range Rovers, Bentleys, and SUVs will have to invest far more in costly low-pollution technology to reduce their emissions than smaller, lighter and more responsible cars:
ethanol :: biodiesel :: biomass :: bioenergy :: biofuels :: energy :: sustainability :: climate change :: emissions :: CO2 :: EU ::
Obviously, manufacturers who produce gas guzzling, inefficient, dirty cars are reacting angrily, and with the same old critique: that the plans threaten jobs in the car industry, particularly for specialist manufacturers. They forecast that the measures would add as much as €2,500 (US$ 3200) to some cars, and they warned that European makers would lose out to imported models. Mr Dimas countered by saying that the new rules would apply equally to imports, adding that the EU would offer tax breaks to carmakers to help the transition to lower-emission vehicles. The fact that the new rules will apply to imported measures hints once again at the global leverage of the EU to transform entire world markets.
Dimas added that costs would rise for buyers of top-of-the-range vehicles, the most polluting ones today, but this is a rational strategy of making the polluter pay. For the average European consumer, higher costs would be far outweighed by fuel savings over the life of the more efficient vehicle.
Global battle: the 'world war against climate change'
Not long ago, a group of US scientists drew up a list of the world's most serious longterm threats and risks. At the top of the list came climate change, which was many, many times more dangerous than the relatively minor problem of international terrorism. So if some are waging a 'global war against terror', then surely we must all wage a 'world war on climate change', a much more pressing and far bigger problem... This is what Dimas must have thought when told BBC News that people should start talking about climate change as a war. It could lead to the death of millions of people, and it could transform the world economy into a war economy, where every sector was involved in the fight against climate change. As a result, he said rising emissions from transport were a problem that had to be tackled.
The new proposals by the Environment Commissioner underpin the commission's recently unveiled climate masterplan, and will be discussed by politicians shortly. The plan may face political opposition, but climate is changing the industrial landscape in a way that may persuade Europe's politicians that it is kind to be tough on their own carmakers.
More information
Euractiv: EU defends leadership in 'world war' on climate change, Jan. 12, 2006
Euractiv: Carmakers fail to deliver on CO2 cuts, fuel consumption, April 16, 2006
European Federation for Transport & Environment: Cleaner is Cheaper: Why European climate policy for cars is failing, and what can be done about it (29 Nov. 2005)
Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas: Why a Global Response needs European Leadership. Launch event of the European Commission and the All Party Parliamentary Group on Climate Change co-operation for 2007, 11 January 2007
Article continues
The EU's transformative power
The consequences of mandatory targets within the EU would be world changing, because they would push all manufacturers who want to sell cars in the world's largest consumer market to produce greener, cleaner and more efficient vehicles. And once they have developed models that conform to the stringent EU standards, there is no reason not to sell them outside of the Union as well. This is the power of the EU at work on a global scale.
The logic behind this global leverage is elegant in its simplicity: everyone wants to sell in the EU, a market of half a billion wealthy consumers. But you can only do so by obeying the bloc's avant-garde rules. And in order to obey these rules, you have to invest knowledge and capital to develop compliant products. Those who manufacture to compliance best and fastest, can capture most market share. And thus a chain of global competition erupts, that transforms entire world markets. The European REACH legislation on chemical substances in consumer products is showing the effectiveness of this strategy very clearly.
Beyond voluntary agreements
Environment Commissioner Dimas knows that he is extremely powerful and that he can use the same mechanism to change the future of the automobile. The Community Strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and improve fuel economy is based on three pillars, namely commitments of the automobile industry to fuel-economy improvements, the labelling of new cars, and the promotion of fuel efficiency through fiscal measures. Since CO2 emissions are linked to fuel consumption, a car that emits less CO2 will consume less fuel, and hence have smaller running costs.
Up till now, the first pillar consisted of a voluntary agreement with motor manufacturers - but they have infuriated the commission by missing their target by almost 50%. This is why Dimas wants to make the objectives mandatory. The EU's emissions target is 120g CO2/km, which corresponds to 4.5l/100km for diesel cars, and 5l/100km for petrol cars.
That would mean a 1.6 litre petrol Ford Focus would need to cut emissions by a third to qualify as an average vehicle under the new regime. Car manufacturers will be able to average out their overall CO2 targets over their entire range of vehicles. But it is clear that heavyweight, polluting cars like Range Rovers, Bentleys, and SUVs will have to invest far more in costly low-pollution technology to reduce their emissions than smaller, lighter and more responsible cars:
ethanol :: biodiesel :: biomass :: bioenergy :: biofuels :: energy :: sustainability :: climate change :: emissions :: CO2 :: EU ::
Obviously, manufacturers who produce gas guzzling, inefficient, dirty cars are reacting angrily, and with the same old critique: that the plans threaten jobs in the car industry, particularly for specialist manufacturers. They forecast that the measures would add as much as €2,500 (US$ 3200) to some cars, and they warned that European makers would lose out to imported models. Mr Dimas countered by saying that the new rules would apply equally to imports, adding that the EU would offer tax breaks to carmakers to help the transition to lower-emission vehicles. The fact that the new rules will apply to imported measures hints once again at the global leverage of the EU to transform entire world markets.
Dimas added that costs would rise for buyers of top-of-the-range vehicles, the most polluting ones today, but this is a rational strategy of making the polluter pay. For the average European consumer, higher costs would be far outweighed by fuel savings over the life of the more efficient vehicle.
Global battle: the 'world war against climate change'
Not long ago, a group of US scientists drew up a list of the world's most serious longterm threats and risks. At the top of the list came climate change, which was many, many times more dangerous than the relatively minor problem of international terrorism. So if some are waging a 'global war against terror', then surely we must all wage a 'world war on climate change', a much more pressing and far bigger problem... This is what Dimas must have thought when told BBC News that people should start talking about climate change as a war. It could lead to the death of millions of people, and it could transform the world economy into a war economy, where every sector was involved in the fight against climate change. As a result, he said rising emissions from transport were a problem that had to be tackled.
The new proposals by the Environment Commissioner underpin the commission's recently unveiled climate masterplan, and will be discussed by politicians shortly. The plan may face political opposition, but climate is changing the industrial landscape in a way that may persuade Europe's politicians that it is kind to be tough on their own carmakers.
More information
Euractiv: EU defends leadership in 'world war' on climate change, Jan. 12, 2006
Euractiv: Carmakers fail to deliver on CO2 cuts, fuel consumption, April 16, 2006
European Federation for Transport & Environment: Cleaner is Cheaper: Why European climate policy for cars is failing, and what can be done about it (29 Nov. 2005)
Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas: Why a Global Response needs European Leadership. Launch event of the European Commission and the All Party Parliamentary Group on Climate Change co-operation for 2007, 11 January 2007
Article continues
Saturday, January 13, 2007
Surin, Thailand: first biomass power plant using rice husks starts feeding electricity to grid
The 9.9MW biomass plant was financed by the Thai Board of Investment at a cost of 600 million baht (€12.9/US$16.7 million) and took about two years to build.
According to Mr. Thongchai Mungcharoenphorn, head of the Surin Provincial Administration Organization, the power plant started to feed eight megawatts of carbon-neutral and renewable electricity into the power grid, which comes down to about 17 percent of the total power needs in the province. Surin has around 1.3 million inhabitants.
Abundant feedstock
The fuel used in the biomass plant consists of rice husks, the leftover material from the rice milling process, which is abundantly available in the region, as Surin is a prime rice growing province. Normally, rice hulls are considered to be waste and are often burned in the open air, causing pollution and CO2 emissions. Alternatively, poorer households often burn the biomass in inefficient stoves, which results in indoor smoke pollution, a true 'killer in the kitchen' which is estimated to cause the death of some 2 million women and children each year (earlier post):
biomass :: bioenergy :: biofuels :: energy :: sustainability :: rice husks :: biomass residues :: fluidized bed combustion :: green electricity :: Thailand ::
Using this biomass in larger, more efficient power plants and converting it into electricity instead of burning it directly in stoves, makes much more sense.
Thailand as a whole produced some 24 million tons of rice in 2004 (FAOstat). At a residue-to-product ratio of 0.20 to 0.35 (meaning that for each ton of rice produced, some 200 to 350 kilogram of husks are left over), and at a lower heating value of between 13 to 19 MJ/kilogram, Thailand's technical energy potential from rice husks alone can be estimated to range between 62.4 and 159.6 Petajoules. (For the residue-to-product ratios and energy potential of biomass residues, see this earlier post).
This considerable bioenergy potential has attracted attention from the research community, with several technologies under development for unlocking the energy contained in this kind of biomass. For example, German scientists from the Fraunhofer Institute are cooperating with Vietnamese collegues on the development of a dedicated circulating fluidized bed combustion system, that burns rice husks very efficiently (earlier post).
Article continues
posted by Biopact team at 5:05 PM 0 comments links to this post