Site icon Conservation news

Study shows mountain forests being lost at ‘alarming rate,’ especially in Asia

  • More than 7% of mountain forests worldwide were lost between 2001 and 2018, with rates of loss almost doubling after 2010.
  • Forest loss varied by region, with tropical mountains losing forests almost three times faster than temperate forests and more than eight times faster than boreal forests.
  • The expansion of farming into highland areas of Southeast Asia was a significant cause of this accelerated rate in the tropics during the study period.
  • Protected areas help reduce mountain forest loss within their boundaries, particularly in high-biodiversity areas where farming and ranching are the leading causes of deforestation.

More than 7% of all mountain forests have been destroyed during the past two decades, according to a new study published in the journal One Earth.

Using high-resolution satellite data and maps of mountain terrains, researchers found that 780,000 square kilometers (301,000 square miles) of mountain forest — an area the size of Texas or twice the size of Norway — were lost worldwide between 2001 and 2018.

The study notes an “alarming acceleration in mountain forest lost worldwide over the past two decades,” with rates of forest loss nearly doubling after 2010.

The study’s findings are a significant concern for biodiversity, as more than 85% of all bird, mammal and amphibian species live all or part of their lives in mountain forests. Many species have a limited range, making them highly susceptible to extinction even with minimal forest loss.

“Mountains have exceptionally high levels of biodiversity, and many of these species are dependent on forests for their survival,” study co-author Paul Elsen, a climate adaptation scientist at the Wildlife Conservation Society, said in a statement. “The high levels of forest loss we observed in mountains could be catastrophic for these sensitive mountain species.”

Mountain forest loss area over time. Figure from He et al 2023.

“[T]he use of large-scale data such as remote-sensing satellite products are a great tool to monitor forest change in almost real time,” Marco Mina, a researcher at the Institute for Alpine Environment, Eurac Research, in Italy, who was not involved in the study told The Guardian. “However, we should be cautious to draw global conclusions based solely on remote-sensing products … A forest that is well managed through a careful planning process can still provide high levels of habitat for plants and animal species.”

The leading cause of deforestation in mountainous regions was logging, accounting for 42% of the loss, while wildfires were responsible for 29%, shifting or slash-and-burn cultivation for 15%, and permanent or semi-permanent agriculture for 10%.

In the tropics, forest loss was caused mainly by shifting agriculture, while in temperate regions it was forestry practices. In boreal areas, most of the forest loss was caused by fires.

The amount of forest loss also varied by region, with tropical mountain forests being lost almost three times faster than temperate forests and more than eight times faster than boreal forests. The study found that the expansion of farming into highland areas of Southeast Asia was a significant cause of this accelerated rate in the tropics. Between 2001 and 2018, more than half of all forest loss in the world occurred in Asia.

Mountain forest loss in the 21st century. (A) Total mountain forest loss area.(B) Acceleration in mountain forest loss in 0.5° cells. Mountain regions in gray show mountains with either little forest loss area or no obvious change during the study period. Figure from He et al 2023.

The researchers also found that protected areas help reduce mountain forest loss within their boundaries, particularly in high-biodiversity areas where farming and ranching are the leading causes of deforestation.

“It was encouraging to find that protected areas were associated with far lower relative forest loss rates within regions of high biodiversity,” Elsen said. “This provides evidence that continued management and investment in protected areas can conserve biodiversity that would otherwise be under much more significant threat from forest loss.”

The authors call for urgent conservation action, including, Elsen said, “increasing sustainable harvesting of forest commodities, making adjustments to supply chains to be deforestation-free, ramping up forest restoration initiatives, and creating collaborative partnerships with Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities leading to co-management of forests.”

Citation:

He, X., Ziegler, A. D., Elsen, P. R., Feng, Y., Baker, J. C. A., Liang, S., … Zeng, Z. (2023). Accelerating global mountain forest loss threatens biodiversity hotspots. One Earth, 6(3), 303-315. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2023.02.005

Banner image: The Great Himalayan National Park is a protected area in a critical biodiversity hotspots. Photo courtesy of Paul Elsen.

FEEDBACK: Use this form to send a message to the author of this post. If you want to post a public comment, you can do that at the bottom of the page.

Exit mobile version