- Since 2011, the Philippine government has imposed a closed fishing season on various major fishing grounds during the sardine spawning season.
- Implemented during the tail end of the year until March the following year, the closed fishing season has been both a boon and bane for communities.
- In the sardine capital of the Zamboanga Peninsula in the country’s south, the ban has boosted catch sizes for artisanal fishers, while in the Visayan Sea in the central Philippines, catches have dwindled.
- Experts point to different implementations of the fishing ban in the two regions and highlight the need to assess the economic implications of the measures, particularly to marginalized fishers.
MINDANAO, Philippines — Four years ago, villagers in the town of Labason in the southern Philippines’ Zamboanga Peninsula woke up to a spectacle they never thought could happen in these modern times: the sight of tons of wriggling sardines washed ashore.
Ecstatic residents, young and old alike, rushed to the shoreline with all kinds of containers and filled them with these tamban (Sardinella lemuru) that they scooped up with their bare hands. The extraordinary event of the heyday fish harvest was caught on video that went viral on social media.
For most Filipinos, sardines are a cheap source of protein. A can of sardines, which costs about 20 pesos (40 U.S. cents) at mom-and-pop stores, is a must-have pantry item in poor Philippine households.
Robert “Dodoy” Ballon, president of the Coalition of Municipal Fisherfolk Association in Zamboanga Sibugay (COMFAZS), says the “sardine galore” event occurred not just in Labason but also in nearby Pagadian City and Tukuran municipality. Ballon, a two-time national winner of the Gawad Saka ng Pangulo Award (Presidential Excellence Award for Agriculture), attributes the unusual beaching of tamban to an annual, three-month-long ban on commercial sardine fishing.
The fishing ban extends from Dec. 1 to Mar. 1, the peak of the sardine spawning season, and covers commercial operators in a conservation area spanning 22,260 square kilometers (8,600 square miles) in portions of the East Sulu Sea, Basilan Strait and Zamboanga Sibugay province. Under Philippine law, violators of the fishing ban can face imprisonment of six months to six years, as well as fines ranging from 40,000 to 1 million pesos ($830 to $20,700), confiscation of their catch and gear, and loss of fishing licenses.
The closure was introduced in 2011 by the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) after studies conducted in the Zamboanga Peninsula, the heart of the country’s sardine production, concluded that the sardine catch was dwindling and individual sardines were getting smaller, apparently due to overfishing.
In addition to commercial fishing and canning, the species has spawned a cottage industry involving the production of bottled Spanish-style sardines. The combined value of all of these ventures is around 20 billion pesos ($413 million), according to data from the Mindanao Development Authority (MinDA).
The ban was supported by major players in the sardine industry and has also gained support from small fishers. The big stakeholders, including the canned sardine manufacturers and commercial fishing operators, feared that without conservation measures, the species would dwindle to a point where catches would no longer be feasible for commercial operations, which would result in industry-wide shutdowns that would displace tens of thousands of workers.
Municipal fishers also welcomed the conservation initiative, which imposes no additional restrictions on small operators. The fishing ban does not apply to fishing in the zone designated for marginal fishers, called municipal waters, which extend up to 15 kilometers (9 miles) from the shoreline. Also, because commercial fishing operations further offshore are restricted during the closed season, high-value fish such as tuna can stray into municipal waters, to the benefit of the small-scale fishers.
“With fewer efforts, municipal fishers catch more sardines and other fish species during the closed fishing season because commercial operations are not allowed. It’s a blessing to the marginal fisherfolk,” Ballon says.
During the fishing ban, Ballon told Mongabay, a municipal fisher can catch 50 to 100 kilograms (110 to 220 pounds) of sardines even without venturing far from the shoreline, because schools of the fish swarm close to shore to feed on plankton.
Records from the BFAR show a steady rise in the volume of sardines landed by both commercial and municipal fishers. From 141,658 tons in 2015, the catch rose to 208,000 tons in 2019.
A study by experts at the University of the Philippines Los Baños from 2016 to 2018 recommended the continuation of the closed fishing season, noting that the results of the ban showed not only an increase in sardine catches but also a rise in the landed catch of high-value non-sardine species such as tuna. “There was a positive impact to society overall,” the authors said.
Nevertheless, workers in the sardine canning plants and commercial fishing companies were displaced during the closed fishing season in the Zamboanga Peninsula, which produces 70% of sardines in the Philippines. There are at least 26 commercial fishing companies and 11 canning firms operating in the peninsula, providing jobs for 50,000 people, industry data show.
During the closed fishing season, many displaced sardine cannery workers look for other work to sustain themselves and their families, such as working in the rubber plantations that thrive in the region, or engaging in talaba (oyster) harvesting. Others find work in the bottled sardine industry. The government, through the Department of Agriculture, also offers easy access to small loans for workers affected by the closed season.
The sardine canneries and commercial fishing companies, meanwhile, use the downtime to conduct repair and maintenance operations on their facilities and vessels.
Emmanuel Piñol, the MinDA secretary and former secretary of the Department of Agriculture, said his agency strongly supports the closed sardine fishing season and will continue to engage coastal communities in working for clean and healthy seas. He cites positive impacts not just for the environment but also in the war to eradicate poverty.
“The reinvigorated fishing industry in the Zamboanga Peninsula has resulted in the reduction of poverty incidence among fisherfolk families from over 40% to 34%,” Piñol said.
Isidro Velayo, Jr., a BFAR executive overseeing the Zamboanga Peninsula, said allowing sardine stocks to replenish is crucial for a sustainable industry, and also has benefits that extend far beyond. To enforce the fishing ban, BFAR deploys three patrol boats to the conservation area and works to improve its cooperation with municipal fishers and other stakeholders.
“Protecting certain species has far-reaching benefits to the ecosystem as a whole,” Velayo said. “We need to ensure the abundance of our fishery resources for future use.”
While the closed fishing season in Zamboanga Peninsula has become a boon to the region’s sardine industry, the results of similar conservation measures aren’t as rosy in the Visayan Sea in the Central Philippines, another major fishing ground.
A closed season has been in place in the Visayan Sea since 1939, to conserve sardines and herring. A BFAR order expanding the protection to include mackerel, running from Nov. 15 to Mar. 15 every year in selected areas of the Visayan Sea, was promulgated in 1989 but only strictly implemented in 2012 — a year after the closed season was implemented in the Zamboanga Peninsula for the first time in December 2011.
In contrast to the Zamboanga case, a recent study found that catch per unit of effort (CPUE) of fishers surveyed had decreased substantially since the strict enforcement of the closed season in the Visayan Sea began in 2012.
Researchers led by fisheries management expert Ruby Napata of the University of the Philippines Visayasinterviewed 200 people involved in the local fishing industry, from fishers to processors to traders and buyers.
The mean CPUE of municipal and small-scale commercial fishers before the strict implementation of the closed season started was 358 kg (789 lb) per day, but decreased to 197 kg (434 lb) after 2012, based on data collection conducted from September to December 2015. That period covered two months of the closed season and two months of the open season, the study noted.
According to the study, 45% of the fishers interviewed said they continued to fish during the ban, but following the guidelines meant they had to travel further, take more risks, and expend more resources to travel beyond their traditional fishing grounds to reach parts of the Visayan Sea that were still open for fishing.
The study also noted that the ban in the Visayas was repeatedly violated: visible infrared imaging radiometer suite (VIIRS) images provided by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Earth Observation Group show vessels operating in the prohibited areas at night.
“One of the major reasons cited by the respondents for non-compliance is the lack of secondary source of livelihood,” the study said. “More than 60 percent of the respondents have no alternative livelihood and [are] solely dependent on the sardine industry.”
On the other hand, the processors (fish dryers) and traders based around the Visayan Sea responded that sardine production increased, but attributed this to supplies coming from outside the restricted area and from neighboring provinces.
The Visayan study noted two key differences between the closed season there and in Zamboanga.
First, the closure in Zamboanga is industry-led, and monitoring is carried out with the help of the Philippine Coast Guard and the Police Maritime Group. Enforcement in the Visayas is monitored only by local governments. Second, while the closure in the Visayas applies to fishers of all sizes, the closure in Zamboanga affects only commercial fishers, leaving small municipal fishers free to continue their trade.
“The closed season policy has economic implications, which led to non-compliance,” researchers in the Visayan Sea study noted. “There is a need to provide livelihood programs to diversify the source of income of the stakeholders who are highly dependent on sardine fisheries.”
A new national law
Groups say they hope a new central government policy, the National Sardines Management Plan (NSMP), will herald the introduction of more rigorous and evidence-based fisheries policies nationwide.
Approved in June 2020, the five-year NSMP seeks to further develop science-based management of sardine fisheries through harvest control measures, data gathering, and stronger implementation of fisheries laws, among other measures.
The plan aims to “guide coordinated management” across the various fishery management areas (FMA) in the country, whose borders the BFAR first defined in 2019. Under this plan, the government and other industry stakeholders can craft and implement targeted fisheries management that could both protect the seascape and provide livelihood for communities.
Gloria Estenzo Ramos, vice president of Oceana, an international ocean conservation group, called for the stringent implementation of the plan.
“The sustainable management of sardine fisheries is one of the goals of the National Sardine Management Plan. Part of the plan is to determine the impact of the close season and support the provision of job opportunities during the close season,” Ramos said in a statement.
She recommended the use of technology like VIIRS — which typically collects images and radiometric data to provide information on the Earth’s clouds, atmosphere, oceans and land surfaces — to detect violations during the close fishing season for sardines.
Napata, R. P., Espectato, L. N., & Serofia, G. D. (2020). Closed season policy in Visayan Sea, Philippines: A second look. Ocean & Coastal Management, 187, 105115. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105115
Rola, A. C., Narvaez, T. A., Naguit, M. R., Elazegui, D. D., Brillo, B. B., Paunlagui, M. M., . . . Cervantes, C. P. (2018). Impact of the closed fishing season policy for sardines in Zamboanga Peninsula, Philippines. Marine Policy, 87, 40-50. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.029
Banner image of
FEEDBACK: Use this form to send a message to the author of this post. If you want to post a public comment, you can do that at the bottom of the page.