Site icon Conservation news

Australia proposes banning environmental boycotts

What do you do when a company is repeatedly caught trashing the environment and refuses to change its ways? Boycott! Activists and campaigners often use boycotting a company’s products when other methods have failed, yet in Australia such boycotts could soon become illegal. The Guardian reported last week that the Australia government is currently mulling a plan to remove an exception for to employ “secondary boycotts.” The news comes amid of a U-turn on environmental protections under the new coalition government headed by Tony Abbott.



“Boycotts have been one of the most important arrows in the quiver of responsible conservationists and consumers. They’ve convinced many environmentally predatory firms around the world to clean up their acts,” said well-known ecologist, William Laurance, a professor at James Cook University in Australia. “It’s a tremendously bad idea.”



Laurance is also the head of the new environmental group, the Alliance of Leading Environmental Researchers and Thinkers or ALERT.



Clearcut logging in Styx Valley, Tasmania. A number of high profile boycotts have revolved around stores selling products made from old-growth forests in Tasmania. Photo by: TTaylor
Clearcut logging in Styx Valley, Tasmania. A number of high profile boycotts have revolved around stores selling products made from old-growth forests in Tasmania. Photo by: TTaylor/Creative Commons 3.0.

Richard Colbeck, Tasmania Senator and the parliamentary secretary for agriculture, told the Guardian that the “secondary boycotts” by environmental groups will be up for the debate by the government, though consumer protection boycotts will stay. Colbeck pointed to a number of recent boycotts in Australia targeting the timber industry for clearcutting native forests, calling it “a dishonest campaign.”



However, the scientists with ALERT argue that such boycotts have proven hugely effective in improving companies with poor environmental records across a number of industries, from seafood to soy to palm oil.



“Boycotts get the attention of environment-destroying companies because they hit them where it hurts—their reputation and market share,” Corey Bradshaw, a professor at the University of Adelaide and member of ALERT, said.



Laurance adds that the government’s “proposal blatantly favors big business over the interests of consumers.”



However, the Colbeck’s proposal may not last long. Already Australia’s Minister for Small Business, Bruce Bilson, told the Sydney Morning Herald that “there are currently no specific plans on the table to make changes to secondary boycott provisions,” although he was aware of the proposal.



The proposal comes on the heels of a number of environmental deregulations pushed by the Abbott coalition, including abolishing a nascent carbon tax, opening up areas of a World Heritage forest for logging, a moratorium on new protected areas, a shark cull, and dumping coal dredge in the Great Barrier Reef.











Related articles


Scientists blast Australian leader’s proposed ban on parks

(03/05/2014) A group of prominent scientists have blasted Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott’s pledge to oppose the creation of any new protected areas in Australia. The Alliance of Leading Environmental Researchers and Thinkers or ALERT, a coalition of conservation scientists, said Abbott is sending the wrong message to the world in promoting industrial logging over protection of the country’s native forests.

Australia proposes removing old-growth forests from World Heritage Site

(02/03/2014) Last year, after decades of fighting, environmentalists and the forestry industry reached a landmark agreement that added 170,000 hectares of old-growth forest in Tasmania as a part of a World Heritage Site. But less than a year later and that so-called peace agreement is in danger of unraveling. The new Australian government, under Prime Minister Tony Abbott, is going ahead with removing 74,000 hectares (43 percent) from the World Heritage site.

Down Under scorching: Australia experiences warmest year on record

(01/06/2014) Australia had its warmest year on record, with annual temperatures 1.2 degrees Celsius (2.16 degrees Fahrenheit) above the 1961-1990 average, according to a new analysis from Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology (BOM). This is 0.5 degrees Celsius higher than the previous warmest year on record—2005—for Australia. Global warming due to burning fossil fuels is increasing temperatures worldwide.

60,000 protest in Australia to keep carbon price

(11/18/2013) Around 60,000 Australians marched yesterday across the country calling on their government not to go backwards on climate action, according to organizers. Australia has taken a sudden U-turn on climate policy with the election of Prime Minister Tony Abbott in September, including legislation to end its carbon pricing, cutting funding to renewable energies, and obstructing progress at the ongoing UN Climate Summit in Warsaw.

Is Australia becoming the new Canada in terms of climate inaction?

(11/14/2013) For many concerned about climate change, Australia has suddenly become the new Canada. With the election of Tony Abbott as Prime Minister in September, the land down under has taken a sudden U-turn on climate policy, including pushing to end its fledgling carbon emissions program which was only implemented in 2012 and cutting funding for renewable energy. These move come at a time when Australia has just undergone its warmest 12 months on record and suffered from record bushfires.

Australia officially bans imports of illegally-logged timber

(10/01/2013) Australia has passed long-debated laws to prohibit the import and trade of illegally logged timber.

Loose laws threaten Australia’s wildlife

(09/09/2013) Kookaburras, koalas and kangaroos—Australia is well known for its charismatic animals and vast, seemingly untamable, wild spaces. But throughout the country, the national parks and reserves that protect these unique animals and ecosystems have come under increasing threat. New rules and relaxed regulations, which bolster immediate economic growth, are putting pressure on Australia’s already-threatened biodiversity.

Exit mobile version