Site icon Conservation news

Fishermen get crafty to circumvent shark fin ban

Authorities in Costa Rica have identified a new method used by fishermen to circumvent a ban on killing sharks for their fins.



According to an INTERPOL alert, fishermen are now leaving a band of skin to keep the fin attached to the spine when they kill sharks. This approach takes advantage of an apparent loophole in regulations governing the shark fin trade.



“This method is aimed at circumventing legislation banning finning which states that the fins of the shark must be ‘naturally attached’ to the body,” said INTERPOL in a dispatch known as a Purple Notice, which provides information on approaches used by criminals to further their trade.



Shark finning technique where only a band of skin to keep the fin attached to the spine is retained and the remainder of the body discarded at sea. This method is aimed at circumventing legislation banning finning which states that the fins of the shark must be 'naturally attached' to the body.


sharks killed for their fins


shark finning
Shark finning technique where only a band of skin to keep the fin attached to the spine is retained and the remainder of the body discarded at sea. This method is aimed at circumventing legislation banning finning which states that the fins of the shark must be ‘naturally attached’ to the body. Images courtesy of INTERPOL.




INTERPOL is currently targeting fisheries crime under “Project Scale”. The international police network estimates that fisheries crime costs the global economy $23 billion dollar a year.



The shark fin industry has surged since the 1990’s due to rising consumption in East Asia, where shark fin is considered a delicacy and believed to have curative properties. But campaigns over the past two years, coupled with a series of countries, states, and municipalities banning the sale and trade of shark fin, seem to have diminished demand as measured by falling prices for shark fin in Hong Kong and Chinese markets.



Nonetheless the toll of the fin trade on sharks is still immense: more than 30 million — and up to 100 million — sharks are thought to be killed on an annual basis.



Great White Shark in South Africa
Great White Shark in South Africa. Photo by Rhett A. Butler











Related articles


Has shark fin consumption peaked at 100M dead sharks per year?

(03/05/2013) While a new study warns that up to 100M sharks are killed annually, there are signs out of China that demand for shark fin may be on the decline. A study published last week in the journal Marine Policy estimated shark deaths at 100 million in 2000 and 97 million in 2010, suggesting a slight drop in shark killing. Meanwhile reports out of China in recent months suggest an accelerating decline in shark fin consumption. China is the top market for shark fin, which is consumed as a status symbol, typically at wedding ceremonies and business dinners.

Saving manta rays from the fin trade

(01/15/2013) Tens of millions of sharks and rays are killed each year to meet demand for shark fin, a delicacy across East Asia. But while the plight of sharks has gained prominence in international environmental circles in recent years, the decline in rays has received considerably less attention. A new film, Manta Ray of Hope, aims to change that. Produced by cinematographer, scuba diver, and marine conservationist Shawn Heinrichs, Manta Ray of Hope offers a look at the mysterious and magnificent world of the world’s largest ray, the manta ray. The film highlights both the threats mantas face as well as some of the people who are working to save them.

Bad science journalism: articles spread misinformation about whale sharks

(07/09/2012) The death of one of the world’s largest recorded whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) in the Arabian Sea provoked a sudden global interest in these massive shark. Weighing 14.5 tons, the fish in question made ‘whale shark ‘whale shark’ the number 3 top search in Google Trends on the day the news hit. But, according to a new study in mongabay.com’s open access journal Tropical Conservation Science, more than half the reports filed by journalists were “factually wrong.”

Exit mobile version