mongabay.com logo About  |   Contact  |  Mongabay on Facebook  |  Mongabay on Twitter  |  Free newsletter
Rainforests | Tropical fish | Environmental news | Blog | For kids | Madagascar | Photos | Non-English languages | Tropical Conservation Science
SHARE:
print


Direct air capture of CO2 to fight global warming is too expensive to be feasible
mongabay.com
December 09, 2011



Using existing technology to "scrub" carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere is far costlier than capturing emissions directly from the smokestacks of coal-burning power plants, reports a paper published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The study, authored by researchers from Stanford and MIT, found that air-capture of CO2 would cost 10-20 times that of carbon capture from "large centralized sources such as power plants, cement plants, fertilizer plants and refineries." The current cost of such capture at centralized sources is $50-100 per metric ton.

"Direct air capture sounds great in theory," said Stanford energy and environmental researcher Jennifer Wilcox in a statement. "In reality, though, a lot of energy is required, and using fossil-based energy sources to capture and regenerate the carbon dioxide could readily result in more carbon dioxide entering the atmosphere than is captured.


Nigel Sizer, a scientist at the World Resources Institute (WRI), wryly noted that the world already has a cheap way to absorb carbon dioxide directly from the air: trees. Tropical forests absorb more than a billion tons (3.7 billion tons of CO2) of carbon per year.
"For direct air capture to be feasible, carbon-free energy, such as solar or wind, is required. But that carbon-free energy would be used more cost effectively to replace CO2-emitting power plants."

The researchers note that concentrations of CO2 in the air are 300 times lower than in the smokestack of a coal-fired power plant.

"The lower atmospheric concentration makes removal from air much more expensive than removing CO2 directly from the flue gases at the source," Wilcox said.

While technology could help make scrubbers more efficient, the economics seems to still favor targeting major emissions sources.

"It's possible to come up with air-scrubbing systems that appear to be feasible. But if you look at empirical data – how engineers look at this, with real-world efficiencies – you don't find many reasons to be hopeful," explained said co-author Howard Herzog of the MIT Energy Initiative.

The study concludes the best path for reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide is to directly cut emissions.

"Ultimately, society needs to move completely away from carbon-based energy resources," said Wilcox.













Related articles





CITATION:
mongabay.com (December 09, 2011). Direct air capture of CO2 to fight global warming is too expensive to be feasible. http://news.mongabay.com/2011/1209-co2_air_capture.html


Tags:
carbon dioxide carbon emissions greenhouse gas emissions global warming mitigation green environment technology energy air pollution pollution coal

print



Environmental news index | RSS | News Feed | Twitter | Home


Advertisements:





Mongabay Store
Wildlife of Madagascar T-shirt
Wildlife of Madagascar T-shirt
Bold and Dangerous - Pygmy tyrant t-shirts
Bold and Dangerous - Pygmy tyrant
Love me before I'm gone - Gladiator frog t-shirts
Love me before I'm gone - Gladiator frog
Licking this frog may make you crazy t-shirts
Licking this frog may make you crazy




DON'T LIKE ADS? Become a mongabay supporter


WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
Email:


RECENT FEATURES
The camera trap revolutionThe camera trap revolution
New theory: forests are rainmakersNew theory: forests are rainmakers
Celebrate frogs on leap day!Celebrate frogs on leap day!
As Amazon deforestation falls, food production risesAs Amazon deforestation falls, food production rises


POPULAR PAGES
Rainforests
Rain forests
Amazon deforestation
Deforestation
Deforestation stats
Why rainforests matter
Saving rainforests
Amazon rainforest
Congo rainforest
Deforestation data
Rainforest canopy

Special sections
New Guinea
Finding new species
Sulawesi
Madagascar
Borneo
REDD

News
Most popular articles
Worth saving?
Forest conservation
Cell phones in Africa
Seniors helping Africa
Saving orangutans in Borneo
Palm oil
Amazon palm oil
Future of the Amazon
Cane toads
Dubai environment
Investing to save rainforests
Visiting the rainforest
Biomimicry
Defaunation
Blue lizard
Extinction debate
Extinction crisis
Industrial deforestation
Save the Amazon
Rainforests & REDD
Brazil's Amazon plan
Avatar story
Amazon ranching

News topics
Amazon
Biofuels
Brazil
Carbon Finance
Conservation
Climate Change
Deforestation
Energy
Happy-upbeat
Indonesia
Interviews
Oceans
Palm oil
Rainforests
Wildlife
MORE TOPICS



Non-English Sites
Chinese
French
German
Indonesian
Italian
Portuguese
Spanish
Other languages

Nature Blog Network







Photos
Brazil photos
Brazil

China photos
China

Colombia photos
Colombia

Costa Rica photos
Costa Rica

Deforestation photos
Deforestation

Gabon photos
Gabon

India photos
India

Indonesia photos
Indonesia

Kenya photos
Kenya

Madagascar photos
Madagascar

Peru photos
Peru

Peru photos
Rainforest



ABOUT
Mongabay.com seeks to raise interest in and appreciation of wild lands and wildlife, while examining the impact of emerging trends in climate, technology, economics, and finance on conservation and development (more)

Help support mongabay.com when you buy from Amazon.com


CALENDARS



BOOKS BY MONGABAY AUTHORS
Rainforest book for kids Conservation in an age of mass extinction


FREE WEEKLY NEWSLETTER



HIGH RESOLUTION PHOTOS / PRINTS








Copyright mongabay 2010

Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from mongabay.com operations (server, data transfer, travel) are mitigated through an association with Anthrotect,
an organization working with Afro-indigenous and Embera communities to protect forests in Colombia's Darien region.
Anthrotect is protecting the habitat of mongabay's mascot: the scale-crested pygmy tyrant.