Chainsaw Milling: Domestic Unregulated Deforestation Agents or Local Entrepreneurs?

/ Gabriel Thoumi

Chainsaw milling: supplier to local markets, provides a much needed insight into the generally unregulated on-site conversion of logs into lumber using chainsaws for tropical in-country domestic markets. Tropical forest chainsaw milling juxtaposes local economic benefit with lack, unregulated oversight.

Chainsaw milling: supplier to local markets,
provides a much needed insight into the generally unregulated on-site conversion of logs into lumber using chainsaws for tropical in-country domestic markets. Tropical forest chainsaw milling juxtaposes local economic benefit with lack, unregulated oversight. While much effort is spent globally tackling institutional trans-national deforestation with global REDD activities led by the private and public sectors and regulated international timber trade led by the Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) regimes and the Lacey Act, very little time and effort is spent regulating tropical timber trade in-country.

Domestic Timber Production, often using chainsaw milling, can range from 30-40% of total timber production in Guyana, Republic of Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda, to greater than 50% of total timber production in Ghana, Cameron and Peru, to almost 100% of total timber production in Liberia. While chainsaw milling provides for local economic development opportunities because of its low-cost, capacity to be applied in inaccessible areas, and its lower impact on the environment through lack of use of tractors and skidders, it is generally either an unregulated activity or an illegal activity as practiced in-country supplying domestic timber production needs. In fact, operating informally can often be much easier for local chainsaw milling crews of three or four individuals since if permits are required they are often difficult and costly to obtain requiring substantial upfront time and capital. This ironically has led to, as in the case of Indonesia, of domestic chainsaw milled lumber being sold illegally into the regional international market under the radar of international scrutiny since little time or effort is spent by appropriate authorities and civil society investigating and regulating chainsaw mill activities.

As is the case in Peru, local chainsaw milled markets are also impacted by the recent global economic downturn that resulted in a decreased demand for lumber from formal sawmills that in turn decreased the quantity of rejected scrap lumber from the formal sawmill available to be sold into the domestic market.

Many countries also incur lost stumpage fees by the lack of regulating the chainsaw mill market with Liberia alone reporting between US$ 18 million to US$ 42, million in annual lost stumpage fee revenues, which is equivalent to 5% of Liberia’s overall 2009 gross domestic product (GDP) of US$ 876 million.

Chainsaw milling can be a dangerous activity, with little formal training available, and at times can lead to substantial waste while generally yielding poor lumber quality. Yet if chainsaw milling is done appropriately, it can have a much lower environmental impact on the surrounding ecosystem through a decrease in skidding and tractor trails. Because of the unregulated and often times illegal nature of chainsaw milling, it is done at night, and when activities are interrupted by authorities, timber is left behind. Both of these situations lead to an inefficient production process that could be made more efficient by effective domestic regulation eventually leading to applying Reduced Impact Logging (RIL) principles in chainsaw milling production.

In the Indonesian context, with a population of 240 million individuals all consuming domestic wood products, there is no oversight or regulation of this large national timber production sector. According to The World Bank, the estimate of the round log volume consumed annually domestically in Indonesia is roughly 10 million m3. Diving further into the data, tropical hardwood prices on average for rough-sawn meranti, bankirai and keruing lumber in Jakarta are approximately US$ 127 m3 yet for legally sourced and produced lumber available in Jakarta, the selling price given onsite data collection at formal sawmills, recovery rates, and transportation costs to Jakarta would have to be at least US$ 273 m3 to be profitable.

In conclusion, most of the roughly 10 million m3 of tropical timber used annually in Indonesia for its domestic 240 million person market is from illegal sources, as described in Chainsaw milling: supplier to local markets.

Finally, as Art Klassen, Regional Director, Tropical Forest Foundation states:

“As long as the government ignores the need to regulate and sustainably manage the forests that supply wood to the domestic market, Indonesia’s forests will continue to shrink and sustainable forest management will remain an unachievable goal.”

How to order free

Chainsaw milling: supplier to local markets

Paperback: 225 Pages, Free

Publisher: European Tropical Forest Research Network

Issue No. 52, December 2010

Gabriel Thoumi frequently contributes to

Related articles

Indonesia signs agreement with EU to end the sale of illegally logged wood

(05/04/2011) The EU and Indonesia today signed an agreement in Jakarta that aims to keep illegally logged wood from reaching the European market. This is the first Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) signed by an Asian nation with the EU and is seen as a considerable step forward on the fight against the illegal logging worldwide.

Illegal rosewood bust in Madagascar

(04/28/2011) Authorities in Madagascar seized several trucks carrying illegally logged rosewood timber, reports Asity Madagascar, a conservation group that aided in the seizure.

Pro-deforestation group calls for weakening of U.S. law against illegal logging

(04/14/2011) A group that lobbies on behalf of forestry conglomerates in Indonesia and Malaysia is calling on the U.S. to roll back legislation intended to fight illegal logging. World Growth International, a Washington D.C.-based group that portrays itself as a humanitarian organization, yet consistently pushes policies that favor industrial forestry interests over those of rural communities, has submitted formal comments to the United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service’s (APHIS) review of the implementation of the revised Lacey Act provisions that prohibit trade in illegally logged wood products, including timber and paper.

Related Articles

Recent comments No Comments

Facebook Comments

Sign In

Connect with

Reset Your Password