|
|
Drought hurts carbon sinks in North America mongabay.com November 26, 2007 East coast forests are most important carbon sink in North America
CarbonTracker, a U.S. government-backed atmospheric monitoring system that continuously measures atmospheric carbon dioxide, allows scientists to track carbon flux of North American ecosystems on a daily basis. Using data from the system, Wouter Peters of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earth System Research Laboratory and colleagues found that North American land absorbed between 0.4 and 1.0 petagrams of carbon (PgC) per year, partially offsetting the annual 1.85 PgC released by fossil fuel burning and cement manufacturing. The authors note that terrestrial uptake fell to 0.32 PgC/yr during the large-scale drought of 2002, suggesting that carbon sinks are sensitive to climate extremes.
Peters and colleagues say several factors influence terrestrial CO2 sink, but that "land-use history has been identified as the major determinant of regional terrestrial uptake." "Large sinks can be found, for instance, in forests recovering from logging in the past century, as well as on abandoned agricultural lands recovering from past carbon losses," they write. "Increased fire suppression and changes in agricultural methods have also led to increased carbon storage in the soils and biosphere. These factors combined may be the cause of the strong uptake we calculate over the East Coast of the United States, in the Canadian coniferous forests, and across the grass and croplands of the Midwest." The researchers say that while "CarbonTracker marks a significant step in our ability to monitor month-by-month surface sources and sinks of CO2," the system takes an "atmospheric view" and doesn't account for all carbon flux. "Large net uptake seen in areas dominated by croplands (0.11 PgC/yr) may be due to the 'atmospheric view' we take with CarbonTracker. Over agricultural lands, our system sees strong CO2 uptake during the growing season but a much smaller return flux from respiration during the non-growing season," they write. "The difference can be explained by harvesting of crops and their subsequent transport, which is a substantial term in the carbon budget... The harvested crops are returned to the atmosphere after consumption spread across the country as a much smaller source per unit area. Because CarbonTracker was not built to keep track of lateral transport, this source is most likely assigned to regions with large population densities, whereas croplands remain annual mean net absorbers of carbon in the Midwest even though the soil carbon accumulation over these areas is thought to be small." CITATION: Wouter Peters et al (2007). An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker. PNAS November 27, 2007 vol. 104 no. 48
News index | RSS | News Feed Advertisements: Organic Apparel from Patagonia | Insect-repelling clothing |
MONGABAY.COM
WEEKLY NEWSLETTER INTERACT
T-SHIRTS 
CALENDARS 
CANVAS BAGS 
|
|
Copyright mongabay 2009 |
